Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26(05): 392-398
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-12-12-0148
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Handling of the tibial muscle envelope in tibial plateau levelling osteotomy - to elevate or not?

A clinical study of 40 dogs
D. J. F. von Pfeil
1   Veterinary Specialists of Alaska, P.C., Anchorage, Alaska, USA
2   Michingan State University, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
,
M. R. Edwards
1   Veterinary Specialists of Alaska, P.C., Anchorage, Alaska, USA
,
N. C. Nelson
2   Michingan State University, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 08 December 2012

Accepted 29 May 2013

Publication Date:
23 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objective: To compare the outcome of the tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) procedure, using a 6-hole 3.5 mm locking TPLO plate and performed with the muscle elevation technique (ET) and placement of sponges, to the TPLO without performing these steps (non-elevation-technique [NET]).

Material and methods: Medical records and radiographs of dogs with ET (n = 21) or NET (n = 19) were retrospectively reviewed. Signalment, TPLO procedure side, meniscal treatment, surgery time, haemorrhage, preand postoperative tibial plateau angle, assistant, amount of rehabilitation, bone healing (cortical, osteotomy, combined healing scores), complications, limb function, recovery time and follow-up were recorded and analysed using multivariate analysis. A value of p <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Surgery time was significantly shorter with the NET (68.5 min ± 3.4) than with the ET (87.8 min ± 3.4) (p <0.01). No significant differences were detected for all other evaluated factors. Soft tissue trauma was minimal and none of the dogs suffered severe haemorrhage. The bone healing scores with the NET and the ET were not significantly different (p = 0.1, p = 0.2, p = 0.1). Complications were rare, minor and not significantly different between groups (p = 0.73).

Clinical relevance: The results of this in vivo study indicate that NET is a feasible technique that can be considered for the clinical setting.

 
  • References

  • 1 Johnson JA, Austin C, Breur GJ. Incidence of canine appendicular musculoskeletal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 through 1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 56-69.
  • 2 Leighton R. Preferred method of repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs – A survey of ACVS diplomates specializing in canine orthopedics. Vet Surg. 1999 28. 194.
  • 3 Pacchiana PD, Morris E, Gillings SL. et al. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 397 cases (1998-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 184-193.
  • 4 Priddy NH, Tomlinson JL, Dodam JR. et al. Complications with and owner assessment of the outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 193 cases (1997-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 1726-1732.
  • 5 Stauffer KD, Tuttle TA, Elkins AD. et al. Complications associated with 696 tibial plateau leveling osteotomies (2001-2003). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2006; 42: 44-50.
  • 6 Fitzpatrick N, Solano MA. Predictive variables for complications after TPLO with stifle inspection by arthrotomy in 1000 consecutive dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 460-474.
  • 7 Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 777-795.
  • 8 Haaland PJ. Sjöström Luxation of the long digital extensor tendon as a complication to tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. A presentation of four cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 224-226.
  • 9 Griffith CJ, Laparde RF, Coobs BR. et al. Anatomy and biomechanics of the posterolateral aspect of the canine knee. J Orthop Res 2007; 25: 1231-1242.
  • 10 Ferrari DA, Wilson DR, Hayes WC. The effect of release of the popliteus and quadriceps force on rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 412: 225-233.
  • 11 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 1093-1110.
  • 12 Baumgaertel F, Buhl M, Rahn BA. Fracture healing in biological plate osteosynthesis. Injury 1998; 29 Suppl 3 C3-6.
  • 13 Hoyland JA, Freemont AJ, Denton J. et al. Retained surgical swab debris in post laminectomy arachnoiditis and peridural fibrosis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 1988; 70B: 659-662.
  • 14 Sharma S. Cotton swabs used to dry to femoral canal leave behind particulate matter: a cadaveric experiment. J Orthopaed Traumatol 2003; 4: 1-4.
  • 15 Farrell M, Calvo I, Clarke SP. et al. Ex vivo evaluation of the effect of tibial plateau osteotomy on the proximal tibial soft tissue envelope with and without the use of protective gauze sponges. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 636-644.
  • 16 Bergh MS, Peirone B. Complications of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 349-358.
  • 17 Corbin EE, Cavanaugh RP, Fick JL. et al. Foreign body reaction to a retained surgical sponge (gossypiboma) mimicking an implant associated sarcoma in a dog after a tibial plateau levelling osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 147-153.
  • 18 Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T. et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique?. J Orthop Trauma 1999; 13: 401-406.
  • 19 Aron DN, Palmer RH, Johnson AL. Biologic strategies and a balanced concept for repair of highly comminuted long bone fractures. Comp Cont Edu Small Anim 1995; 17: 35-47.
  • 20 Eugster S, Schawalder P, Gaschen F. et al. A prospective study of postoperative surgical site infections in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 542-550.
  • 21 Moles A, Glyde M. Anatomical investigation of the canine cranial tibial artery. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 351-355.
  • 22 Pozzi A, Samii V, Horodyski MB. Evaluation of vascular trauma after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy with or without gauze protection. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 266-271.
  • 23 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA. Approach to the stifle joint through a medial incision. In: An atlas of surgical approaches to the bones and joints of the dog and cat. Philadelphia, PE: Saunders; 2004. pg. 2004-347.
  • 24 Barnhard MD. Results of single-session bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomies as a treatment for bilaterally ruptured cranial cruciate ligaments in dogs: 25 cases (2000-2001). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003; 39: 573-578.
  • 25 Millis DL, Levine D, Taylor RA. et al. Sample postoperative rehabilitation protocol for tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. In: Millis DL, Levine D, Taylor RA. editors. Canine rehabilitation and physical therapy. St. Louis: Saunders; 2004. pg. 2004-477.
  • 26 Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG. et al. Proposed definitions and criteria for reporting time frame, outcome, and complications for clinical orthopedic studies in veterinary medicine. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 905-908.
  • 27 Ansari MZ, Swarup S, Ghani R. et al. Oscillating saw injuries during removal of plaster. Eur J Emerg Med 1998; 5: 37-39.
  • 28 May M, Gunia S, Helke C. et al. Penile entrapment in a plastic bottle–a case for an oscillating splint saw. Int Urol Nephrol 2006; 38: 93-95.
  • 29 Kim SE, Pozzi A, Banks SA. et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy on femorotibial contact mechanics and stifle kinematics. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 23-32.
  • 30 Kergosein DH, Barnhart MD, Kees CE. et al. Radiographic and clinical changes of the tibial tuberosity after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 468-474.
  • 31 Guiot LP, Dejardin LM. Prospective evaluation of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in 36 nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 171-182.
  • 32 Pozzi A, Risselada M, Winter MD. Assessment of fracture healing after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or open reduction and internal fixation of coexisting radius and ulna fractures in dogs via ultrasonography and radiography. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 241: 744-753.
  • 33 Cheng W, Li Y, Manyi W. Comparison study of two surgical options for distal tibia fracture - minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis vs. open reduction and internal fixation. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 737-742.
  • 34 Pozzi A, Hudson CC, Gauthier CM. et al. Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation of radius-ulna fractures in dogs. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 19-27.
  • 35 Glasser D, Langlais F. The ISOLS Radiological Implants Evaluation System. In: Langlais F, Tomeno B. editors. Limb Salvage: Major Reconstructions in Oncologic and Nontumoral Conditions. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1991. pg 1991-23.
  • 36 Innes J, Barr ARS. Can owners assess outcome following treatment of canine cruciate ligament deficiency?. J Sm Anim Pract 1998; 39: 373-378.
  • 37 Innes JF, Bacon D, Lynch C. et al. Long-term outcome of surgery for dogs with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Vet Rec 2000; 147: 325-328.