Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24(04): 266-271
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-10-03-0043
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of vascular trauma after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy with or without gauze protection

A cadaveric angiographic study
A. Pozzi
1   University of Florida, Veterinary Medical Center, Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Gainesville, Florida, United States
4   University of Florida, Comparative Orthopedics and Biomechanical Laboratory, Gainesville, Florida, United States
,
V. Samii
2   Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
M. B. Horodyski
3   University of Florida, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Gainesville, Florida, United States
4   University of Florida, Comparative Orthopedics and Biomechanical Laboratory, Gainesville, Florida, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received:20 March 2010

Accepted:24 February 2011

Publication Date:
21 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objective: To evaluate the integrity of the cranial tibial artery after performing the tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) with or without soft tissue dissection and protection with gauze sponges.

Study design: Experimental cadaveric study.

Animals: Ten dogs weighing 28 to 35 kg.

Methods: Ten pairs of normal pelvic limbs were divided randomly into two groups in which a TPLO was performed with or without soft tissue protection with gauze sponges respectively. Angiography was used to evaluate the integrity of the cranial tibial artery after TPLO in each group. Contrast angiography was performed for each group: 1) before TPLO [Control] 2) after TPLO [Osteotomy] and 3) after intentional laceration of the cranial tibial artery [Arteriotomy]. A ‘yes or no’ was used to score contrast extravasation. The area of extravasated contrast was also calculated on the radiographs. A Mann-Whitney test and an ANOVA with repeated measures were completed to assess the score and the area, respectively, for each of the surgical treatments (Control, Osteotomy, and Arteriotomy) between the conditions of dissection with respect to the cranial tibial artery. A value of p <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The differences between the two groups (with and without protection) for scores and areas of leakage were not significant (p >0.05). However, significant differences were noted between Control and Arteriotomy (p <0.01) and Osteotomy and Arteriotomy (p <0.01), but not between Control and Osteotomy (p >0.05).

Conclusions and clinical relevance: A TPLO without protection of the cranial tibial artery can be performed without increased risk of arterial trauma.

 
  • References

  • 1 Slocum B, Slocum TD.. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1993; 23: 777-795.
  • 2 Moles A, Glyde M.. Anatomical investigation of the canine cranial tibial artery. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009; 22: 351-355.
  • 3 Pacchiana PD, Morris E, Gillings SL. et al. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 397 cases (1998–2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003; 222: 184-193.
  • 4 Priddy NH, Tomlinson JL, Dodam JR. et al. Complications with and owner assessment of the outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 193 cases (1997–2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003; 222: 1726-1732.
  • 5 Stauffer KD, Tuttle TA, Elkins AD. et al. Complications associated with 696 tibial plateau leveling osteotomies (2001–2003). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2006; 42: 44-50.
  • 6 Cooper R, Cawley A.. Blood supply to the periosteum of the canine tibia. Am J Vet Res. 1988; 49: 1419-1423.
  • 7 Evans H, GC C.. Miller&quote;s Anatomy of the dog. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1979
  • 8 Macnab I, De Haas WG.. The role of periosteal blood supply in the healing of fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1974; 27-33.
  • 9 Field JR, Tornkvist H.. Biological fracture fixation: A perspective. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2001; 14: 169-178.
  • 10 Perren SM.. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 1093-1110.
  • 11 Reif U, Dejardin LM, Probst CW. et al. Influence of limb positioning and measurement method on the magnitude of the tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg. 2004; 33: 368-375.
  • 12 Piermattei DL, Johnson KA.. Approach to the proximal tibia through a medial incision. In: An atlas of surgical approaches to the bones and joints of the dog and cat. Philadelphia (PA, USA): W. B. Saunders Company; 2004: 366-369.
  • 13 Schmerbach KI, Boeltzig CK, Reif U. et al. In vitro comparison of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy with and without use of a tibial plateau leveling jig. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 156-163.
  • 14 Farrell M, Calvo I, Clarke SP. et al. Ex vivo evaluation of the effect of tibial plateau osteotomy on the proximal tibial soft tissue envelope with and without the use of protective gauze sponges. Vet Surg. 2009; 38: 636-644.
  • 15 Wilson J.. Blood supply to developing, mature, and healing bone. In Sumner-Smith G. editor Bone in clinical orthopedics. Stuttgart (Germany): Thieme; 2002: pg. 23-116.
  • 16 Simpson AH.. The blood supply of the periosteum. J Anat. 1985; 140 (Pt 4) 697-704.
  • 17 Allen MR, Hock JM, Burr DB.. Periosteum: biology, regulation, and response to osteoporosis therapies. Bone 2004; 35: 1003-1012.
  • 18 Rhinelander FW.. Tibial blood supply in relation to fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1974; 34-81.
  • 19 Anderson GI, Richards RR, Paitich B. et al. Soft-tissue blood flow after segmental osteotomy of the canine tibia. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 27: 49-55.
  • 20 Ansari MZ, Swarup S, Ghani R. et al. Oscillating saw injuries during removal of plaster. Eur J Emerg Med 1998; 5: 37-39.
  • 21 May M, Gunia S, Helke C. et al. Penile entrapment in a plastic bottle – a case for using an oscillating splint saw. Int Urol Nephrol 2006; 38: 93-95.
  • 22 Griffith CJ, Laprade RF, Coobs BR. et al. Anatomy and biomechanics of the posterolateral aspect of the canine knee. J Orthop Res. 2007; 25: 1231-1242.
  • 23 Ferrari DA, Wilson DR, Hayes WC.. The effect of re-lease of the popliteus and quadriceps force on rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 225-233.
  • 24 Kim SE, Pozzi A, Banks SA. et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy on femorotibial contact mechanics and stifle kinematics. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 23-32.