Adaptive Hierarchical Test Procedure for Developmentally Delayed Adults: Taking the "Difficult" Out of "Difficult to Test"

ABSTRACT

Successful audiological assessment of adult clients with developmental disabilities requires that a respectful and trusting client-examiner relationship be established. Test protocols must meet the purpose of the assessment while matching the abilities of the client. In this article, the components of an assessment framework and strategies for evaluating individuals with developmental disabilities are described. The approach is client-centered and emphasizes each client's strengths and abilities throughout all phases of assessment. To support our recommendations for test selection, we provide a hierarchical test battery and decision matrix. This was derived from clinical experience, literature review, and a retrospective analysis of audiological records for 108 adults with mental retardation evaluated at the University of Arizona Hearing Clinic from May 1998 to May 2000.

KEYWORDS

Mental retardation - developmental disability - audiology - hearing loss - audiological evaluation - functional assessment - otoacoustic emissions

REFERENCES

• 1 Ray C. Mental retardation and/or developmental disabilities. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 5th ed Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2002: 557-566
• 2 Young C V. Developmental disabilities. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th ed Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins 1994: 521-533
• 3 Faux C, DeFeo A. Referral of adults with developmental disabilities for speech, language and augmentative and alternative communication services: guidelines for the audiologist.  Semin Hear . 2003;  24 235-246
• 4 Mascia J. Non-traditional view of clinical services. Thoughts of a former traditionalist. NFAD Newsletter Spring 1995: 6-7
• 5 Beukelman D R, Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1992
• 6 Greenspan S J, Wieder S. Principles of Clinical Practice for Assessment and Intervention. Interdisciplinary Council on Development and Learning Disorders. Bethesda, MD: CDL Press 2000: 55-82
• 7 Biasini F, Grup L, Huffman L, Bray N. Mental retardation: a symptom and a syndrome. In: Netherton SD, Holmes D, Walker CE, eds. Child and Adolescent Psychological Disorders: A Comprehensive Textbook New York: Oxford University Press 1999: 6-23
• 8 Fischler R. The pediatrician's role in early identification. In: Cherow E, ed. Hearing-Impaired Children and Youth with Developmental Disabilities Washington, DC: Gallaudet Press 1985: 37-56
• 9 www.ihr.gla.ac.uk Accessed November 14, 2002. 
• 10 MacFarland S. Current trends and issues in understanding adults with developmental disabilities.  Semin Hear . 2003;  24 171-178
• 11 www.aamr.org Accessed November 7, 2002. 
• 12 Bagley M, Mascia J. Hearing Changes in Aging People with Mental Retardation. Silver Springs, MD: The Arc of the United States and the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center. www.thearc. org/faqs/hearingaging. Accessed November 7, 2002
• 13 Dille M. Perspectives on the audiologic evaluation of individuals with Down syndrome.  Semin Hear . 2003;  24 201-210
• 14 American Speech Language and Hearing Association. Position Paper 1989/IV-37. The Role of Speech-language Pathologists and Audiologists in Service Delivery for Persons with Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilties in Community Settings.  ASHA . 1989;  32(Suppl 2) 5-6
• 15 Hodgson W. Evaluating infants and young children. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th ed Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins 1994: 465-475
• 16 Gorlin R J, Torieello H V, Cohen M M. Hereditary Hearing Loss and Its Syndromes. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995
• 17 www.geneclinics.com Accessed November 16, 2002. 
• 18 www.boystown.org Accessed November 16, 2002. 
• 19 Green G E. Evaluation of neurologic syndromes with mental retardation and auditory sequelae.  Semin Hear . 2003;  24 179-188
• 20 American Speech Language and Hearing Association. Guidelines for screening hearing impairments and middle ear disorders.  ASHA . 1990;  32(Suppl 3) 17-24
• 21 Sells J P, Hurley R M, Moorehouse C R, Douglas J E. Validity of the ipsilateral acoustic reflex as a screening parameter.  J Am Acad Audiol . 1997;  8 132-136
• 22 Harris F, Probst R. Otoacoustic emissions and audiometric outcomes. In: Robinette MS, Glattke TJ, eds. Otoacoustic Emissions, 2nd ed New York: Thieme 2002: 213-242
• 23 Bess F. The unilaterally hearing impaired child: a final comment.  Ear Hear. 1986;  7 51-54
• 24 Oyler R, Oyler A, Matkin N. Unilateral hearing loss demographic and educational impact.  Lang Speech Hear Schools . 1988;  19 201-210
• 25 Mueller III H G, Hall J W. Audiologist's Desk Reference, Volume II.  San Diego, CA: Singular 1998
• 26 Matkin N. Assessment of hearing sensitivity during the preschool years. In: Bess F, ed. Childhood Deafness New York: Grune and Stratton 1977: 138
• 27 Wiley T, Stoppenbach D T. Practice versus evidence in diagnostic audiometry.  ASHA . 1997;  39 46-47
• 28 Mascia J, Mascia N. Methods and strategies for audiologic assessment of individuals who are deaf-blind with developmental disabilities.  Semin Hear . 2003;  24 211-222
• 29 Cevette M, Glattke T. Effects of medications on physiological measures of auditory function.  Semin Hear . 2003;  24 223-234
• 30 Jerger J, Hayes D. The crosscheck principle.  Arch Otolaryngol . 1976;  102 614-620
• 31 Fisher L I. Fisher auditory problems checklist. Cedar Rapids, IA: Grant Woods Education 1976
• 32 Marcot Riley A. Informal Communication Skills Inventory. Evaluating Acquired Skills in Communication Revised. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders 1991