Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(03): 233-242
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669908
SMFM Fellowship Series Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Implementation and Outcomes of Universal Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping at Term

Janine S. Rhoades
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Victoria G. Wesevich
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Methodius G. Tuuli
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
,
George A. Macones
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
,
Alison G. Cahill
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 May 2018

25 July 2018

Publication Date:
12 September 2018 (online)

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the implementation of an institutional protocol for universal delayed umbilical cord clamping (DCC) at term on maternal, neonatal, and umbilical cord blood gas outcomes.

Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton term gestations from April through July 2017. On June 1, 2017, a protocol was implemented for DCC in all deliveries. Outcomes were compared between patients delivered prior to and those delivered after implementation. The primary outcome was postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Secondary outcomes were additional adverse maternal, neonatal, and umbilical cord blood gas outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.

Results Of 682 patients, 341 were delivered preprotocol and 341 were delivered postprotocol. After implementation, there was 91.8% adherence to the protocol. Overall, there was no significant difference in PPH between patients delivered preprotocol and those delivered postprotocol (8.2 vs. 13.2%; adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98–1.51). There was a significant decrease in the ability to obtain paired arterial and venous umbilical cord blood gases from preprotocol to postprotocol (83 vs. 63.6%; aRR: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.50–0.76]). There were no significant differences in abnormal umbilical cord blood gases or neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion We did not find an increased risk of adverse outcomes associated with the widespread use of DCC.

 
  • References

  • 1 McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (07) CD004074
  • 2 Andersson O, Lindquist B, Lindgren M, Stjernqvist K, Domellöf M, Hellström-Westas L. Effect of delayed cord clamping on neurodevelopment at 4 years of age: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169 (07) 631-638
  • 3 Begley CM, Gyte GM, Devane D, McGuire W, Weeks A. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (03) CD007412
  • 4 Kuo K, Gokhale P, Hackney DN, Ruangkit C, Bhola M, March M. Maternal outcomes following the initiation of an institutional delayed cord clamping protocol: an observational case-control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31 (02) 197-201
  • 5 Andersson O, Hellström-Westas L, Andersson D, Clausen J, Domellöf M. Effects of delayed compared with early umbilical cord clamping on maternal postpartum hemorrhage and cord blood gas sampling: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92 (05) 567-574
  • 6 Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 684: Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping after Birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129 (01) e5-e10
  • 7 Vain NE, Satragno DS, Gorenstein AN. , et al. Effect of gravity on volume of placental transfusion: a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2014; 384 (9939): 235-240
  • 8 Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) e168-e186
  • 9 Westgate J, Garibaldi JM, Greene KR. Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at delivery: a time for quality data. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101 (12) 1054-1063
  • 10 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2001
  • 11 Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998; 280 (19) 1690-1691
  • 12 Frolova AI, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG, López JD, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Duration of the third stage of labor and risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127 (05) 951-956
  • 13 Rhoades JS, Bierut T, Conner SN. , et al. Delayed umbilical cord clamping at <32 weeks' gestation: implementation and outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2017; 34 (11) 1048-1053
  • 14 Allan DS, Scrivens N, Lawless T. , et al. Delayed clamping of the umbilical cord after delivery and implications for public cord blood banking. Transfusion 2016; 56 (03) 662-665
  • 15 Wiberg N, Källén K, Olofsson P. Delayed umbilical cord clamping at birth has effects on arterial and venous blood gases and lactate concentrations. BJOG 2008; 115 (06) 697-703
  • 16 De Paco C, Florido J, Garrido MC, Prados S, Navarrete L. Umbilical cord blood acid-base and gas analysis after early versus delayed cord clamping in neonates at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283 (05) 1011-1014
  • 17 Valero J, Desantes D, Perales-Puchalt A, Rubio J, Diago Almela VJ, Perales A. Effect of delayed umbilical cord clamping on blood gas analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 162 (01) 21-23