Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2013; 23(04): 317-321
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1333636
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Functional-Conservative Treatment of Extra-articular Physeal Fractures of the Proximal Phalanges in Children and Adolescents

Torsten Franz
1   Department of Surgery, Uster Hospital, Uster, Switzerland
2   Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
,
Abdul R. Jandali
3   Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
,
Florian J. Jung
3   Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
,
Franck M. Leclère
4   Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
,
Urs von Wartburg
2   Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
,
Urs Hug
2   Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

19 September 2012

19 November 2012

Publication Date:
26 February 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Fractures of the proximal phalanges of the fingers are common injuries in children and adolescents. The majority can be treated by closed reduction and splinting, and complications are rare. The purpose of the prospective study was to document the results of functional-conservative treatment of extra-articular physeal fractures using either a functional forearm cast or the Lucerne Cast (LuCa).

Methods Clinical and radiographic results of 13 pediatric patients having 13 extra-articular physeal fractures (e.g., juxta-epiphyseal fractures, Salter–Harris type I or II physeal fractures) of the proximal phalanges were recorded through a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Intra-articular physeal fractures (Salter–Harris type III or IV), fractures involving the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ), pathological fractures, open fractures, and concomitant injuries of the tendons were excluded.

Results Fracture consolidation was achieved in all cases within 4 weeks. No palmar apex angulations, no rotational deformities, and no PIPJ extension lags could be observed. All patients achieved full total active range of motion within 3 months.

Conclusions Well-reduced extra-articular physeal fractures of the proximal phalanges can be effectively treated using functional-conservative casts. Although children may need a functional forearm cast, a LuCa is adequate in compliant adolescents.

Level of Evidence The level of evidence for the study is Level II (therapeutic studies).

Keywords

pediatric fractures - finger - proximal phalanx - functional treatment
 

  • References

  • 1 Bhende MS, Dandrea LA, Davis HW. Hand injuries in children presenting to a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22 (10) 1519-1523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hastings II H, Simmons BP. Hand fractures in children. A statistical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 188 (188) 120-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Vadivelu R, Dias JJ, Burke FD, Stanton J. Hand injuries in children: a prospective study. J Pediatr Orthop 2006; 26 (1) 29-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Al-Qattan MM. Juxta-epiphyseal fractures of the base of the proximal phalanx of the fingers in children and adolescents. J Hand Surg [Br] 2002; 27 (1) 24-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Al-Qattan MM, Al-Zahrani K, Al-Boukai AA. The relative incidence of fractures at the base of the proximal phalanx of the fingers in children. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33 (4) 465-468
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cornwall R, Ricchetti ET. Pediatric phalanx fractures: unique challenges and pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 445: 146-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ebinger T, Roesch M, Wachter N, Kinzl L, Mentzel M. Functional treatment of physeal and periphyseal injuries of the metacarpal and proximal phalangeal bones. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36 (4) 611-615
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Figl M, Weninger P, Hofbauer M, Pezzei C, Schauer J, Leixnering M. Results of dynamic treatment of fractures of the proximal phalanx of the hand. J Trauma 2011; 70 (4) 852-856
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Franz T, von Wartburg U, Schibli-Beer S , et al. Extra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanges of the fingers: a comparison of 2 methods of functional, conservative treatment. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (5) 889-898
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Franz T, Wartburg U, Hug U. [Extraarticular proximal phalangeal fractures of the hand: Functional conservative management using the Lucerne Cast (LuCa) - a preliminary prospective study]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2010; 42 (5) 293-298
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pezzei C, Leixnering M, Hintringer W. [Functional treatment of basal joint fractures of three-joint fingers]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1993; 25 (6) 319-329
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Thomine JM, Gibon Y, Bendjeddou MS, Biga N. Functional brace in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the proximal phalanges of the last four fingers. Ann Chir Main 1983; 2 (4) 298-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Berme N, Paul JP, Purves WK. A biomechanical analysis of the metacarpophalangeal joint. J Biomech 1977; 10 (7) 409-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Salter RB, Harris WR. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963; 45: 587-622
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Barton NJ. Fractures of the phalanges of the hand in children. Hand 1979; 11 (2) 134-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Reyes FA, Latta LL. Conservative management of difficult phalangeal fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 214 (214) 23-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Strickland JW, Steichen JB, Kleinmann WB , et al. Phalangeal fractures: factors influencing digital performance. Orthop Rev 1982; 11: 39-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Zancolli E. Structural and dynamic bases of hand surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1979: 12-31
    Google Scholar