Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26(01): 61-68
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-11-11-0154
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Experiences using the Fixin locking plate system for the stabilization of appendicular fractures in dogs

A clinical and radiographic retrospective assessment
T. Nicetto
1   Clinica Veterinaria Milano Sud, Peschiera Borromeo, Milano, Italy
,
M. Petazzoni
1   Clinica Veterinaria Milano Sud, Peschiera Borromeo, Milano, Italy
,
A. Urizzi
2   Clinica Veterinaria Dr Andrea Urizzi, San Michele al Tagliamento, Venezia, Italy
,
M. Isola
3   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Padua, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 02 November 2011

Accepted 22 August 2012

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To retrospectively evaluate the stabilization of appendicular fractures in dogs using the Fixin locking plate system.

Materials and methods: Medical records and radiographs of dogs with fractures stabilized with the Fixin system in the period from May 2005 to September 2010 were reviewed. For each patient, data pertaining to signalment, the nature of the fracture, implants used, and evidence of fracture healing were recorded. The outcome and complications were determined from clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations. Limb function was evaluated between 40 days and 90 days postoperatively. Owners of pets with complications were contacted by phone for long-term follow-up.

Results: Eighty-two fractures in seventy-five dogs met the inclusion criteria for the study. Radiographic re-examinations were carried out between eight days to two years (median 60 days) following surgery. Seventy-three out of 82 fractures (89%) reached union without complications. Major complications were seen in six dogs (7%). Limb function was graded as ‘normal’ in 73/75 (97%) dogs and ‘mild lameness’ in 2/75 (3%) cases.

Clinical significance: Despite a modest complication rate, the Fixin locking bone plating system appears to be an acceptable choice of implant for the stabilization of appendicular fractures in dogs.

Keywords

Fracture - fixin - dog - internal fixator - osteo-synthesis
 

  • References

  • 1 Larson AN, Rizzo M. Locking plate technology and its applications in upper extremity fracture care. Hand Clin 2007; 23: 269-278.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34: S-B31-S-B42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84-B: 1093-1110.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cronier P, Pietu G, Dujardin C. et al. The concept of locking plates. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96S: S17-S36.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Klaue K, Fengels I, Perren SM. Long-term effects of plate osteosynthesis: comparison of four different plates. Injury 2000; 31 (Suppl. 2) S-B51-S-B62.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Petazzoni M, Urizzi A, Verdonck B. et al. Fixin internal fixator: Concept and technique. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 250-253.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 TraumaVet Fixin, Catalogue 09/10 [Internet]. Rivoli (TO): TraumaVet s.r.l. 2010 [updated 2010 July 2010; cited 2012 Feb 09]. Available from: http://www.traumavet.it/documenti/Fixin_catalogue_UK.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hernanz GY, Diaz MA, Jara SF. et al. Early results with the new internal fixator systems LCP and LISS: A prospective study. Acta Orthop Belg 2007; 73: 60-69.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Baroncelli AB, Baroni G, Olivieri M. et al. Clinical application of LCP Synthes Plate in skeletal appendicular fractures in dogs. Veterinaria 2011; 25: 13-21.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Haaland PJ, Sjöström L, Devor M. et al. Appendicular fracture repair in dogs using the locking compression plate system: 47 cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 309-315.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Voss K, Kull MA, Haessig M. Repair of long-bone fractures in cats and small dogs with the Unilock mandible locking plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 398-405.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ozsoy S, Altunatmaz K. Treatment of extremity fractures in dogs using external fixators with closed reduction and limited open approach. Vet Med 2003; 48: 133-140.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McCartney WT, Garvan CB, Kiss K. Repair of thirty-six fractures in dogs using the Mennen clamp-on plate: preliminary results. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 406-411.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Duhautois B. Use of veterinary interlocking nails for diaphyseal fractures in dogs and cats: 121 cases. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 8-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Larsen LJ, Roush JK, McLaughlin RM. Bone plate fixation of distal radius and ulna fractures in small- and miniature-breed dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999; 35: 243-250.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hamilton MH, Langley Hobbs SJ. Use of the AO veterinary mini ‘T’-plate for stabilization of distal radius and ulna fractures in toy breed dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 18-25.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Summer-Smith G. A comparative investigation into the healing of fractures in miniature Poodles and mongrel dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1974; 15: 323-328.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vaughan LC. A Clinical study of non-union fractures in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1964; 5: 173-177.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Waters DJ, Breur GJ, Toombs JP. Treatment of common forelimb fractures in miniature- and toy-breed dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993; 29: 442-448.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Welch JA, Boudrieau RJ, DeJardin LM. et al. The intraosseus blood supply of the canine radius: implications for healing of distal fractures in small dogs. Vet Surg 1997; 26: 57-61.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 2) S-B63-S-B76.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G. et al. Biomechanical testing of the LCP - how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 2) S-B11-S-B19.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kanchanomai C, Phiphobmongkol V, Muanjan P. Fatigue failure of an orthopedic implant - A locking compression plate. Engineering Failure Analysis 2008; 15: 521-530.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Blake CA, Boudrieau RJ, Torrance BS. et al. Single cycle to failure in bending of three standard and five locking plates and plate constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 408-417.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cabassu JB, Kowaleski MP, Shorinko JK. et al. Single cycle to failure in torsion of three standard and five locking plates constructs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 418-425.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. Fracture: Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment. In: Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. pg. 130.
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Roberts JW, Grindel SI, Rebholz B. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model. J Hand Surg 2007; 32A: 971-975.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McKee WM, Macias C, Innes JF. Bilateral fixation of Y-T humeral condyle fractures via medial and lateral approaches in 29 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2005; 46: 217-226.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar