Time Process Study with UML

Summary

Objectives: We propose a new business-process analysis approach, Time Process Study (TPS), which comprises process analysis and time and motion studies (TMS). TPS offsets weaknesses of TMS; the cost of field studies and the difficulties in applying them to tasks whose time span differs from those of usual tasks.

Methods: In TPS, the job procedures are first displayed using a unified modeling language (UML). Next, time and manpower for each procedure are studied through interviews and TMS, and the information is appended to the UML diagram. We applied TPS in the case of a hospital-based cancer registry (HCR) of a university hospital to clarify the work procedure and the time required, and investigated TPS’s availability.

Results: Meetings for the study were held once a month from July to September in 2008, and one inquirer committed a total of eight hours to the hospital survey. TPS revealed that HCR consisted of three tasks and 14 functions. The registration required 123 hours/month/ person, the quality control required 6.5 hours/ 6 months/person and filing data into the population-based cancer registry required 0.5 hours/6 months/person. Of the total tasks involved in registration, 116.5 hours/month/ person were undertaken by a registration worker, which shows the necessity of employing one full-time staff.

Conclusion: With TPS, it is straightforward to share the concept among the study-team because the job procedure is first displayed using UML. Therefore, it requires a few workload to conduct TMS and interview. The obtained results were adopted for the review of staff assignment of HCR by Japanese government.

Keywords

UML - business modeling - time and motion study - hospital-based cancer registration - time process study

• References

• 1 Harewood GC, Chrysostomou K, Himy N, Leong WL. A “time-and-motion” study of endoscopic practice: Strategies to enhance efficiency. Gastrointest Endos 2008; 68 (06) 1043-1050.
• 2 Bratt J, Foreit J, Chen P, West C, Janowitz B, Vargas T. A comparison of four approaches for measuring clinician time use. Health Policy Plan 1999; 14 (04) 374-381.
• 3 Finkler SA, Knickman JR, Hendrickson G, Lipkin Jr M, Thompson WG. A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research. Health Serv Res 1993; 28 (05) 577-597.
• 4 Numasaki H, Harauchi H, Ohno Y, Inamura K, Kasahara S, Monden M, Sakon M. New classification of medical staff clinical services for optimal reconstruction of job workflow in a surgical ward: Application of spectrum analysis and sequence relational analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2007; 51 (12) 5708-5717.
• 5 Numasaki H, Ohno Y, Ishii A, Kasahara S, Fujimoto H, Harauchi H, Inamura K, Monden M, Sakon M. Workflow analysis of medical staff in surgical wards based on time-motion study data. Jpn Hosp 2008; 27: 75-80.
• 6 Ishii A, Ohno Y, Kasahara S, Hirakawa K, Kitamura Y, Nakamura A, Murata K, Inamura K, Harauchi H, Monden M, Sakon M, Fujimoto H, Morita T. The study of the relationship between patient status indicators and patient’s care time using multilevel analysis. Jpn J Med Inf 2002; 22 (05) 367-375.
• 7 Ohno Y. Optimal Staff Assignment and Best Practice in Cancer Care based on Quantitative Surveys: Time Motion Study. Report for a Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant for Clinical Cancer Research (H19-009) 2008 (in Japanese).
• 8 Wirth P, Kahn L, Perkoff GT. Comparability of two methods of time and motion study used in a clinical setting: work sampling and continuous observation. Med Care 1977; 15 (11) 953-960.
• 9 Nahm ES, Vaydia V, Ho D, Scharf B, Seagull J. Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: a practical guide. Nursing Outlook 2007; 55 (06) 282-288.
• 10 Sobue T. Current activities and future directions of the cancer registration system in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2008; 13 (02) 97-101.
• 11 Nishimoto H. Current status and future vision of hospital-based cancer registries in Japan. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2008; 109 (02) 101-104 (in Japanese).
• 12 Penker M, Eriksson HE. Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000
• 13 Ministry of Health and Labor, Department of health general affairs section, Office of promoting measures for cancer. Guidelines for preparing designated cancer care hospitals No. 0301001. Issued on March 2008 (in Japanese).
• 14 Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Japan. Manual for hospital-based cancer registrar 2006. Available at http://ganjoho.jp/hospital/cancer_registration/registration02_01.html.
• 15 Jensen OM, Parkin DM, Mac Lennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG. Cancer Registration: Principal and Methods. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1991
• 16 Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I, Booch G. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Second Edition. Addison-Wesley; 2004
• 17 OMG. UNIFIEF MODELING LANGUAGE. Web site: http://www.uml.org.
• 18 Fujii A, Matsumura Y, Mineno T, Taniike M, Ueda K, Murata T, Ikebe Y, Izumi K, Takeda H. Construction and operation of cancer registration using electronic chart system. FY2007 University Hospitals Information Management Communications Conference 2008; 138-140 (in Japanese).
• 19 Lyalin D, Williams W. Modeling cancer registration processes with an enhanced activity diagram. Methods Inf Med 2005; 4 (01) 1-3.
• 20 Yamada K, Ktagiri S, Okada M. An investigation concerning the utility of physician summaries as records: Considering the extent of including regional cancer registry items. Shinryoroku Kanri 2008; 20 (01) 44-50 (in Japanese).
• 21 Kumarapeli P, De Lusignan S, Ellis T, Jones B. Using Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a process-modeling technique for clinical-research process improvement. Med Inform Internet Med 2007; 32 (01) 1-64.
• 22 Knape T, Hederman L, Wade VP, Gargan M, Harris C, Rahman Y. A UML approach to process modeling of clinical practice guideline for enactment. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003; 5: 35-40.