Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere 2016; 44(04): 207-217
DOI: 10.15653/TPG-150624
Originalartikel
Schattauer GmbH

Prävalenz von Lahmheiten unterschiedlichen Grades in der Frühlaktation von Milchkühen und deren Einfluss auf Fruchtbarkeitsparameter

Prevalence and severity of lameness in early lactation in dairy cows and the effect on reproductive performance
Corina Orgel
1   Klinik für kleine Klauentiere und Forensische Medizin/Ambulatorische Klinik, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
,
Inga Ruddat
2   Institut für Biometrie, Epidemiologie und Informationsverarbeitung, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
,
Martina Hoedemaker
3   Klinik für Rinder, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 07. August 2015

Accepted after major revision: 01. April 2016

Publikationsdatum:
23. Dezember 2017 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Gegenstand und Ziel: Untersuchung des Effekts von Lahmheiten auf die Fruchtbarkeit von Milchkühen. Material und Methoden: In sieben Betrieben mit Boxenlaufstallhaltung fand in 4-wöchigen Intervallen eine Beurteilung aller Milchkühe anhand eines Locomotion Scoring Systems (Score 1: nicht lahm bis Score 5: schwer lahm) statt. Im Beobachtungszeitraum von 18 Monaten konnten von 893 Kühen im 1. und von 944 Kühen im 2., 3. und 4. Laktationsmonat (LM) der Bewegungsscore und die Fruchtbarkeitsparameter erfasst werden. Die Auswertungen beinhalteten den Vergleich der Fruchtbarkeitskennzahlen zwischen nicht lahmen Kühen (Score 1) und Kühen mit geringgradigen Lahmheiten (Score 2) oder mittelgradigen Lahmheiten (Score ≥ 3). Ergebnisse: Kühe, die unabhängig von Betrieb und Laktationsnummer im 1. LM Scores ≥ 3 aufwiesen, zeigten eine um 6 Tage längere Rastzeit (86,2 ± 35,6 vs. 80,2 ± 34,1 Tage; p = 0,002) und eine um 16 Tage längere Güstzeit (119,7 ± 51,4 vs. 103,8 ± 55,5 Tage; p = 0,048). Zudem wurden sie signifikant häufiger nicht tragend (Odds Ratio: 2,1; 95%-Konfidenzintervall: 1,095, 4,040; p = 0,026). Kühe mit Score 2 im 3. LM wiesen eine um 4 Tage (84,7 ± 35,6 vs. 80,1 ± 30,5 Tage; p = 0,026) und Kühe mit Score ≥ 3 eine um 7 Tage längere Rastzeit auf als nicht lahme Kühe (87,2 ± 34,9 vs. 80,1 ± 30,5 Tage; p = 0,002). Kühe mit geringgradiger Lahmheit im 3. LM hatten zudem eine um 18 Tage längere Güstzeit als nicht lahme Tiere (120,1 ± 55,4 vs. 102,3 ± 47,6 Tage; p = 0,016). Die längsten mittleren Rastzeiten ergaben sich bei Kühen mit Score 1 im 1. LM und Score 3 im 3. LM (94,3 ± 33,9 vs. 76,5 ± 16,0 Tage bei nicht lahmen Kühen; p = 0,046). Schlussfolgerung und klinische Relevanz: Nicht nur deutliche (Score ≥ 3), sondern auch geringgradige Lahmheiten in der Frühlaktation beeinträchtigen die Reproduktionsleistung einer Herde. Eine konsequente Überwachung der Klauengesundheit und eine fachgerechte frühzeitige Behandlung geringgradig und deutlich lahmer Tiere können einen Beitrag zum Tierwohl und zur ökonomischen Effizienz einer Milchviehherde leisten.

Summary

Objective: To examine the impact of different degrees of lameness on the fertility of dairy cows. Material and methods: Seven dairy herds housed in free stall barns with cubicles were visited at 4-week intervals and all cows were examined for locomotion characteristics using a locomotion scoring system. The cows received scores from 1 (normal gait) to 5 (severely lame). During the study period of 18 months, 893 cows in the first month of lactation and 944 cows in the second, third and fourth months of lactation were evaluated. Reproductive mea - sures between non-lame cows (score 1), mild lame cows (score 2) and cows with clear lameness (score ≥ 3) were compared. Results: Independent of parity and herd effects, cows with scores ≥ 3 in the first month of lactation displayed a 6 days longer calving to first service inter val (CFSI) (86.2 ± 35.6 vs. 80.2 ± 34.1 days; p = 0.002) and a 16 days longer calving to conception interval (CCI) (119.7 ± 51.4 vs. 103.8 ± 55.5 days; p = 0.048) than non-lame cows. Additionally, the risk for non-conception was significantly higher in cows suffering from lameness in the first month of lactation (odds ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.095, 4.040; p = 0.026). Cows affected by mild lameness in the third month of lactation had a 4 days longer CFSI (84.7 ± 35.6 vs. 80.1 ± 30.5 days; p = 0.026) and a 18 days longer CCI (120.1 ± 55.4 vs. 102.3 ± 47.6 days; p = 0.016) than non-lame cows, while the CSFI in distinct lame cows was extended by 7 days compared to non-lame cows (87.2 ± 34.9 vs. 80.1 ± 30.5 days; p = 0.002). Cows with the score 1 in the first month and score 3 in the third month of lactation showed the longest CSFI (94.3 ± 33.9 vs. 76.5 ± 16.0 days in non-lame cows; p = 0.046). Conclusion and clinical relevance: This study suggests that both distinct and mild lameness in early lactation lead to a decline in reproduction in dairy herds. A regular determination of the lameness prevalence in dairy herds and optimizing claw health management, including early treatment of lame cows, will enhance animal welfare and reproduction efficiency.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Alawneh JI, Laven RA, Stevenson MA. The effect of lameness on the fertility of dairy cattle in a seasonally breeding pasture-based system. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 5487-5493.
  • 2 Alawneh JI, Laven RA, Stevenson MA. Interval between detection of lameness by locomotion scoring and treatment for lameness: a survival analysis. Vet J 2012; 193: 622-625.
  • 3 Amory JR, Kloosterman P, Barker ZE, Wright JL, Blowey RW, Green LE. Risk factors for reduced locomotion in dairy cattle on nineteen farms in The Netherlands. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 1509-1515.
  • 4 Bach A, Dinarés M, Devant M, Carré X. Associations between lameness and production, feeding and milking attendance of Holstein cows milked with an automatic milking system. J Dairy Res 2007; 74: 40-46.
  • 5 Bertoni G, Trevisi E, Han X, Bionaz M. Effects of inflammatory conditions on liver activity in puerperium period and consequences for performance in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91: 3300-3310.
  • 6 Bicalho RC, Cheong SH, Cramer G, Guard CL. Association between a visual and an automated locomotion score in lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 3294-3300.
  • 7 Bicalho RC, Vokey F, Erb HN, Guard CL. Visual locomotion scoring in the first seventy days in milk: impact on pregnancy and survival. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 4586-4591.
  • 8 Blowey RW, Green LE, Collis VJ, Packington AJ. The effects of season and stage of lactation on lameness in 900 dairy cows. Proceedings of 13th International Symposium and 5th Conference on Lameness in Ruminants. Maribor, Slowenia: 2004: 43-45.
  • 9 Cook NB. Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223: 1324-1328.
  • 10 Dobson H, Smith RF. What is stress, and how does it affect reproduction?. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000 60-61. 743-752.
  • 11 Dubuc J, Duffield TF, Leslie KE, Walton JS, LeBlanc SJ. Risk factors and effects of postpartum anovulation in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 1845-1854.
  • 12 Dyer RM, Neerchal NK, Tasch U, Wu Y, Dyer P, Rajkondawar PG. Objective determination of claw pain and its relationship to limb locomotion score in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 4592-4602.
  • 13 Espejo LA, Endres MI, Salfer JA. Prevalence of lameness in high-producing holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 3052-3058.
  • 14 Garbarino EJ, Hernandez JA, Shearer JK, Risco CA, Thatcher WW. Effect of lameness on ovarian activity in postpartum holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 4123-4131.
  • 15 Gómez F, Boer H de, van Eerdenburg FJCM. Relationship between mild lameness and expression of oestrus in dairy cattle. Vet Rec 2003; 152: 403-404.
  • 16 Hernandez J, Garbarino EJ, Shearer JK, Risco CA, Thatcher WW. Comparison of the calving-to-conception interval in dairy cows with different degrees of lameness during the prebreeding postpartum period. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227 (08) 1284-1291.
  • 17 Hernandez J, Shearer JK, Webb DW. Effect of lameness on the calving-toconception interval in dairy cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218: 1611-1614.
  • 18 Hirst WM, Murray RD, Ward WR, French NP. A mixed-effects time-toevent analysis of the relationship between first-lactation lameness and subsequent lameness in dairy cows in the UK. Prev Vet Med 2002; 54: 191-201.
  • 19 Hoedemaker M, Gundelach Y, Schulz T, Feldmann M. Frequency of claw/limb diseases in relation to locomotion score and duration of lameness in a Northern German diary herd. Proceedings of the 28th World Buiatrics Congress: Oral commuminaction and abstracts. Cairns, Australia: 2014: 54.
  • 20 Hoedemaker M, Mansfeld R, De Kruif A, Heuwieser W. Ergebnisinterpretation und Strategien - Betrachtung einzelner Kontrollbereiche. Tierärztliche Bestandsbetreuung beim Milchrind. 2. Aufl. De Kruif A, Mansfeld R, Hoedemaker M. Stuttgart: Enke; 2014: 32-34.
  • 21 Hultgren J, Manske T, Bergsten C. Associations of sole ulcer at claw trimming with reproductive performance, udder health, milk yield, and culling in Swedish dairy cattle. Prev Vet Med 2004; 62: 233-251.
  • 22 Kujala M, Orro T, Soveri T. Serum acute phase proteins as a marker of inflammation in dairy cattle with hoof diseases. Vet Rec 2010; 166: 240-241.
  • 23 Loeffler SH, de Vries MJ, Schukken YH. The effects of time of disease occurrence, milk yield, and body condition on fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1999; 82: 2589-2604.
  • 24 Manson FJ, Leaver JD. The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Anim Prod 1988; 47: 185-190.
  • 25 Melendez P, Bartolome J, Archbald LF, Donovan A. The association between lameness, ovarian cysts and fertility in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 927-937.
  • 26 Nanda AS, Dobson H, Ward WR. Relationship between an increase in plasma cortisol during transport-induced stress and failure of oestradiol to induce a luteinising hormone surge in dairy cows. Res Vet Sci 1990; 49: 25-28.
  • 27 Orgel C. Regelmäßige Beurteilung von Lahmheiten bei Milchkühen und die Auswirkung von Lahmheit auf die Milchleistung, die Fruchtbarkeit und den Gesundheitsstatus in verschiedenen Milchviehbetrieben. Diss med vet, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover. 2010 http://elib.tiho-hannover.de/dissertations/orgelc_ss10.pdf
  • 28 Rajkondawar PG, Liu M, Dyer RM, Neerchal NK, Tasch U, Lefcourt AM. et al. Comparison of models to identify lame cows based on gait and lesion scores, and limb movement variables. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 4267-4275.
  • 29 Smith BI, Kauffold J, Sherman L. Serum haptoglobin concentrations in dairy cattle with lameness due to claw disorders. Vet J 2010; 186: 162-165.
  • 30 Sogstad AM, Østerås O, Fjeldaas T. Bovine claw and limb disorders related to reproductive performance and production diseases. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 2519-2528.
  • 31 Sood P, Nanda AS. Effect of lameness on estrous behavior in crossbred cows. Theriogenology 2006; 66: 1375-1380.
  • 32 Soto P, Natzke RP, Hansen PJ. Identification of possible mediators of embryonic mortality caused by mastitis: actions of lipopolysaccharide, prostaglandin F2alpha, and the nitric oxide generator, sodium nitroprusside dihydrate, on oocyte maturation and embryonic development in cattle. Am J Reprod Immunol 2003; 50: 263-272.
  • 33 Sprecher DJ, Hostetler DE, Kaneene JB. A lameness scoring system that uses posture and gait to predict dairy cattle reproductive performance. Theriogenology 1997; 47: 1179-1187.
  • 34 Tadich N, Flor E, Green L. Associations between hoof lesions and locomotion score in 1098 unsound dairy cows. Vet J 2010; 184: 60-65.
  • 35 Tadich N, Tejeda C, Bastias S, Rosenfeld C, Green LE. Nociceptive threshold, blood constituents and physiological values in 213 cows with locomotion scores ranging from normal to severely lame. Vet J 2013; 197: 401-405.
  • 36 Vermunt JJ, Greenough PR. Predisposing factors of laminitis in cattle. Br VetJ 1994; 150: 151-164.
  • 37 Warnick LD, Janssen D, Guard CL, Grohn YT. The effect of lameness on milk production in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 1988-1997.
  • 38 Webb R, Nicholas B, Gong JG, Campell BK, Guttierrez CG, Gaverick HA, Armstrong G. Mechanism regulating follicular development and selection of the dominant follicle. Reprod Suppl 2003; 61: 71-90.
  • 39 Whay HR. Locomotion scoring and lameness detection in dairy cattle. In Pract 2002; 24: 444-449.
  • 40 Whay HR, Waterman AE, Webster AJ. Associations between locomotion, claw lesions and nociceptive threshold in dairy heifers during the peri-partum period. Vet J 1997; 154: 155-161.
  • 41 Winckler C, Brill G. Lameness prevalence and behavioual traits in cubicle housed dairy herds - a field study. Proceedings of 13th International Symposium and 5th Conference on Lameness in Ruminants. Maribor, Slowenia: 2004: 160-161.
  • 42 Yeruham I, Avidar Y, Bargai U, Adin G, Frank D, Perl S, Bogin E. Laminitis and dermatitis in heifers associated with excessive carbohydrate intake: skin lesions and biochemical findings. J S Afr Vet Assoc 1999; 70 (04) 167-171.