J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24(4): 295-299
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1080532
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Perforator-to-Perforator Musculocutaneous Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Reconstruction of a Lumbosacral Defect Using the Lumbar Artery Perforator as Recipient Vessel

Marc A.M Mureau1 , Stefan O.P Hofer1 , 2
  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • 2Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 June 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

Reconstruction of large-sized lumbosacral or sacral defects often is not possible using local or regional flaps, making the use of free flaps necessary. However, the difficulty of any microsurgical procedure in this region is complicated by the need to search for potential recipient vessels to revascularize the flap. In the present case, a free musculocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap to cover a large-sized and deep lumbosacral defect was used. Arterial anastomosis was performed, connecting the cutaneous anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator to the perforator of the second lumbar artery. In this fashion, the arterial circulation through the flap was flowing reversely through the muscle. The concomitant vein of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery was hooked up to the thoracodorsal vein using a long interposition vein graft because the perforator of the second lumbar vein was too small. Postoperative healing was uneventful. In conclusion, a successful reconstruction of a lumbar defect has shown that local perforators in the lumbar area may be accessible for easier perforator-to-perforator anastomoses and that the muscular part of the musculocutaneous ALT flap can survive on retrograde arterial perfusion from a perforator of the skin island.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Di Benedetto G, Bertani A, Pallua N. The free latissimus dorsi flap revisited: a primary option for coverage of wide recurrent lumbosacral defects.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 1960-1965
  • 2 Posch N AS, Mureau M AM, Flood S J, Hofer S OP. The combined free partial vastus lateralis with anterolateral thigh perforator flap reconstruction of extensive composite defects.  Br J Plast Surg. 2005;  58 1095-1103
  • 3 Nahai F, Hagerty R. One-staged microvascular transfer of a latissimus dorsi flap to the sacrum using vein grafts.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;  77 312-315
  • 4 Miles W K, Chang D W, Kroll S S et al.. Reconstruction of large sacral defects following total sacrectomy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  105 2387-2394
  • 5 Park S, Koh K S. Superior gluteal vessel as recipient for free flap reconstruction of lumbosacral defect.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  101 1842-1849
  • 6 Anthony J P, Ritter E, Moelleken B R. Utility of the inferior gluteal vessels in free flap coverage of sacral wounds.  Ann Plast Surg. 1992;  29 371-375
  • 7 Duteille F, Perrot P, Floch N, Pannier M. Advantages of using intercostal vessels as the recipients for free flaps covering lumbar defects.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004;  20 523-526
  • 8 Ramirez O M, Swartz W M, Futrell J W. The gluteus maximus muscle: experimental and clinical considerations relevant to reconstruction in ambulatory patients.  Br J Plast Surg. 1987;  40 1-10
  • 9 Ao M, Mae O, Namba Y, Asagoe K. Perforator-based flap for coverage of lumbosacral defects.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  101 987-991
  • 10 Kato H, Hasegawa M, Takada T, Torii S. The lumbar artery perforator based island flap: anatomical study and case reports.  Br J Plast Surg. 1999;  52 541-546
  • 11 Roche N A, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P N, Matton G, Monstrey S J. The use of pedicled perforator flaps for reconstruction of lumbosacral defects.  Ann Plast Surg. 2000;  45 7-14
  • 12 De Weerd L, Weum S. The butterfly design: coverage of a large sacral defect with two pedicled lumbar artery perforator flaps.  Br J Plast Surg. 2002;  55 251-261
  • 13 Mureau M AM, Posch N AS, Meeuwis C A, Hofer S OP. Anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction of large external facial skin defects: a follow-up study on functional and aesthetic recipient- and donor-site outcome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  115 1077-1086
  • 14 Koshima I, Fujitsu M, Sugiyama N. Supermicrosurgery and perforator-to-perforator free flaps. In: Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC Perforator Flaps: Anatomy, Technique, and Clinical Applications. St. Louis, MO; Quality Medical Publishing 2006: 977-987
  • 15 Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K. Intercostal and lumbar artery perforator flaps. In: Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC Perforator Flaps: Anatomy, Technique, and Clinical Applications. St. Louis, MO; Quality Medical Publishing 2006: 513-528
  • 16 Mureau M AM, Flood S J, Hofer S OP. Total peroneal artery occlusion during fibula free flap harvesting: salvage using the venous flow-through principle.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117 101e-106e
  • 17 Del Pinal F, Taylor G I. The deep venous system and reverse flow flaps.  Br J Plast Surg. 1993;  46 652-664
  • 18 Koch H, Scharnagl E, Schwarzl F X, Haas F M, Hubmer M, Moshammer H E. Clinical application of the retrograde arterialized venous flap.  Microsurgery. 2004;  24 118-124

Marc A.M MureauM.D. Ph.D. 

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam

P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    >