Sprache · Stimme · Gehör 2002; 26(4): 182-189
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36211
Schwerpunktthema
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Sprachanwendungsbasierende Interventionen bei phonologischen Störungen

Language-Based Intervention for Phonological DisordersA. A. Tyler1
  • 1Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, School of Medicine, Nell J. Redfield Bldg./152, Reno, NV 89557
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
19. Dezember 2002 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Kinder mit phonologischen Störungen weisen oft auch Störungen in anderen Domänen des Spracherwerbs auf. Sprachanwendungsbasierende Ansätze basieren auf allen Aspekten der Sprache. Deshalb wird häufig den Lautbildungsfehlern, auch hinsichtlich der Therapie, weniger Beachtung geschenkt. Die sprachanwendungsbasierenden Therapieansätze beinhalten eine Vielzahl naturalistischer, konversationsbasierender Techniken wie fokussierte Stimulation in Form von Expansion und Umformung, Verwendung strukturierter Erzählungen (narrativer Strukturen) und elizitierende Produktionstechniken wie Alternativfragen, Lückensatzergänzungen und Vorbereitungsinduktionen. Ergebnisse von gut kontrollierten Gruppenstudien zeigen keinen eindeutigen Effekt hinsichtlich der Übertragung von morphosyntaktischen Ansätzen auf phonologische Fähigkeiten. Nichtsdestotrotz gibt es aber manche Kinder, deren phonologische Fähigkeiten von einem solchen sprachanwendungsbasierenden Ansatz profitieren. Vorläufige Daten deuten darauf hin, dass ein solcher Ansatz Therapie der Wahl bei Kindern sein kann, die sowohl Sprech- bzw. Sprachstörungen haben und deren phonologisches System sehr inkonsequent ist. Ein Vorteil der sprachanwendungsbasierenden Ansätze mag sein, dass es bei Kindern, die Schwierigkeiten in beiden Domänen (phonetisch-phonologisch und morphosyntaktisch) haben, sowohl zu einer Verbesserung der Sprech- wie Sprachanwendungsleistung kommen kann. Sprachanwendungsbasierende Interventionen können auch eine Alternative sein, wenn aufgrund äußerer Umstände eine Gruppentherapie oder Betreuung mehrerer Kinder gleichzeitig erforderlich ist. Sollte eine sprachanwendungsbasierende Intervention für Kinder mit reinen phonologischen Störungen angewendet werden, ist es wichtig, den phonologischen Fortschritt genau zu kontrollieren und zu beobachten.

Abstract

Children with phonological disorders often display difficulty in other domains of language. Language-based approaches focus on all aspects of language; therefore, little attention may be drawn to sound errors and these may not be specific targets of intervention. These approaches involve a variety of naturalistic, conversationally based techniques such as focused stimulation in the form of expansion and recasts, scaffolding narratives, and elicited production devices such as forced choice questions, cloze tasks, and preparatory sets. Results from well-controlled group studies are inconclusive regarding the cross-domain effects of morphosyntax approaches on phonology. There are, however, individual children whose phonology improves with a language-based approach. Preliminary evidence suggests that such an approach may be an appropriate choice for children with both speech and language impairments whose phonological systems are highly inconsistent. One advantage of a language-based approach is that it may lead to simultaneous improvements in both speech and language for children with difficulty in both these domains. It is also a viable option when service delivery dictates classroom and collaborative settings. When a language-based approach is chosen for children with phonological disorders, it is imperative that the practitioner monitor phonological progress closely to ensure its effectiveness.

Literatur

  • 1 Bishop D VM, Edmundson A. Language-impaired 4-year olds: distinguishing transient from persistent impairments.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1987;  52 156-173
  • 2 Paul R, Shriberg L D. Associations between phonology and syntax in speech-delayed children.  J Speech Hear Res. 1982;  25 536-547
  • 3 Shriberg L D, Austin D. Comorbidity of speech-language disorders: implications for a phenotype marker for speech delay. In: Paul R, ed The Speech-Language Connection. Baltimore; Brookes 1998: 73-117
  • 4 Shriberg L D, Kwiatkowski J. Developmental phonological disorders I: A clinical profile.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1994;  37 1100-1126
  • 5 Shriberg L D, Kwiatkowski J, Best S, Hengst J, Terselic-Weber B. Characteristic of children with phonologic disorders of unknown origin.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1986;  51 140-161
  • 6 Tallal P, Ross R, Curtiss S. Familial aggregation in specific language impairment.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1989;  54 167-173
  • 7 Paul R, Jennings P. Phonological behavior in toddlers with slow expressive language development.  J Speech Hear Res. 1992;  35 99-107
  • 8 Pharr A, Ratner N, Rescorla L. Syllable structure development of toddlers with expressive specific language impairment.  Applied Psycholing. 2000;  21 429-449
  • 9 Rescorla L, Ratner N. Phonetic profiles of toddlers with specific expressive language impairment (SLI-E).  J Speech Hear Res. 1996;  39 153-165
  • 10 Thal D, Oroz M, McCaw V. Phonological and lexical development in normal and late-talking toddlers.  App Psycholing. 1995;  16 407-424
  • 11 Crystal D. Towards a „bucket” theory of language disability: taking account of interaction between linguistic levels.  Clin Linguist Phonet. 1987;  1 7-22
  • 12 Panagos J M. The case against the autonomy of phonological disorders in children.  Semin Speech Lang Hear. 1982;  3 172-182
  • 13 Camarata S. A rationale for naturalistic speech intelligibility intervention. In: Fey M, Windsor J, Warren S, eds Language Intervention: Preschool through the Early School Years. Baltimore; Brookers 1995: 63-84
  • 14 Hoffman P R, Norris J A, Monjure J. Comparison of process targeting and whole language treatment for phonologically delayed preschool children.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1990;  21 102-109
  • 15 Norris J A, Hoffman P R. Language intervention within naturalistic environments.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1990;  21 72-84
  • 16 Norris J A, Hoffman P R. Language Intervention for School-Age Children. San Diego, CA; Singular 1993
  • 17 Tyler A A, Sandoval K T. Preschoolers with phonological and language disorders: treating different linguistic domains.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1994;  25 215-234
  • 18 Backus O, Beasley J. Speech Therapy with Children. Boston; Houghton Mifflin 1951
  • 19 Shriberg L D. Programming for the language component in development phonological disorders.  Semin Speech Lang Hear. 1982;  3 115-148
  • 20 Bock J K. Towards a cognitive psychology of syntax: information processing contributions to sentence formulation.  Psychol Rev. 1982;  89 1-47
  • 21 Dell G S. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. (Cognitive Science Technical Reports No 21.) Rochester, NY; University of Rochester 1986
  • 22 Stemberger J P. An interactive activation model of language production. In: Ellis A, ed Progress in the Psychology of Language. Vol 1 London; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1985
  • 23 Kamhi A G. Three perspectives on language processing: interactionism, modularity, and holism. In: Chapman R, ed Processes in Language Acquisition and Disorders. St Louis; Mosby-Year Book 1992
  • 24 Masterson J, Kamhi A. Linguistic trade-offs in school-age children with and without language disorders.  J Speech Hear Res. 1992;  35 1064-1075
  • 25 Panagos J, Quine M, Klich R. Syntactic and phonological influences on children’s articulation.  J Speech Hear Res. 1979;  22 841-848
  • 26 Connell P J. An effect of modeling and imitation teaching procedures on children with and without specific language impairment.  J Speech Hear Res. 1987;  30 105-113
  • 27 Fey M. Language Intervention with Young Children. San Diego, CA; College-Hill Press 1986
  • 28 Friedman P, Friedman K. Accounting for individual differences when comparing the effectiveness of remedial language teaching methods.  App Psycholing. 1980;  1 151-170
  • 29 Leonard L. Children with Specific Language Impairment. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press 1998
  • 30 Weismer S E, Murray-Branch J. Modeling versus modeling plus evoiked production training: a comparison of two language intervention methods.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1989;  54 269-281
  • 31 Hoffman P R. Synergistic development of phonetic skill.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1992;  23 254-260
  • 32 Cleave P, Fey M. Two approaches to the facilitation of grammar in children with language impairments: rationale and description.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;  6 22-32
  • 33 Tyler A A, Lewis K, Haskill A, Tolbert L. Efficacy and cross-domain effects of phonological and morphosyntactic interventions.  Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in School. 2002;  33 52-66
  • 34 Matheny N, Panagos J M. Comparing the effects of articulation and syntax programs on syntax and articulation improvement.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1978;  9 57-61
  • 35 Goffman L, Leonard R. Growth of language skills in preschool children with specific language impairment: implications for assessment and intervention.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2000;  9 151-161
  • 36 Rice M, Wexler K, Cleave P. Specific language impairments as a period of extended optional infinitive.  J Speech Hear Res. 1995;  38 850-863
  • 37 Rice M, Wexler K, Hershberger S. Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;  41 1412-1430
  • 38 Bedore L M, Leonard L B. Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: a discriminant function analysis.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;  41 1185-1192
  • 39 Fey M, Cleave P L, Ravida A, Long S H, Dejmal A E, Easton D L. Effects of grammar facilitation on the phonological performance of children with speech and language impairments.  J Speech Hear Res. 1994;  37 594-607
  • 40 Lee L. Development Sentence Analysis. Evanston, IL; Northwestern University Press 1974
  • 41 Shriberg L D, Kwiatkowski J. Phonological disorders III: a procedure for assessing severity of involvement.  J Speech Hear Disord. 1982;  17 256-270
  • 42 Wilcox K A, Morris S E. Speech intervention in a language-focused curriculum. In: Rice M, Wicox K, eds Building a Language-Focused Curriculum for the Preschool Classroom: A Foundation for Lifelong Communication. Baltimore; Brookes 1995: 73-89
  • 43 Rice M L. The rationale and operating principles for a language-focused curriculum for preschool children. In: Rice M, Wilcox K, eds Building a Language-Focused Curriculum for the Preschool Classroom: A Foundation for Lifelong Communication. Baltimore; Brookes 1995: 27-38
  • 44 Wilcox K A, Morris S E. Speech outcomes of the language-focused curriculum. In: Rice M, Wilcox K, eds Building a Language-Focused Curriculum for the Preschool Classroom: A Foundation for Lifelong Communication. Baltimore; Brookes 1995: 171-180
  • 45 Goldman R, Fristoe M. Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation. Circle Pines, MN; AGS 1986
  • 46 Bernhardt B H, Stemberger J P. Workbook in Nonlinear Phonology for Clinical Application. Austin, TX; Pro-Ed 2000
  • 47 Lowe R J. Phonology Assessment and Intervention Applications in Speech Pathology. Baltimore; Williams & Wilkins 1994
  • 48 Meyer C. The relationship of various predictors to phonological change following treatment. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Nevada Reno; 2000
  • 49 Bankson N, Bernthal J E. Bankson-Bernthal Test of Phonology. Austin, TX; Pro-Ed 1990
  • 50 Zimmerman I, Steiner V, Pond R. Preschool Language Scale-3. San Antonio; The Psychological Corporation 1992
  • 51 Burgemeister B, Blum B, Lorge I. Columbia Mental Maturity Scale, ed 3. New York; Psychological Corporation 1972
  • 52 Hodson B W. The Assessment of Phonological Processes-Revised. Danville, IL; Interstate Press 1986
  • 53 Tyler A A, Watterson K H. Effects of phonological versus language intervention in preschoolers with both phonological and language impairment.  Child Lang Teach Ther. 1991;  7 141-160
  • 54 Conture E, Louko L, Edwards M L. Simultaneously treating stuttering and disordered phonology in children: experimental therapy, preliminary findings.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1993;  2 72-81
  • 55 Gruber F A. Probability estimates and paths to consonant normalization in children with speech delay.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;  42 448-459
  • 56 Shriberg L D, Gruber F A, Kwiatkowski J. Developmental phonological disorders III: long-term speech-sound normalization.  J Speech Hear Res. 1994;  37 1151-1177

M. Ptok

Klinik und Poliklinik für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, MHH

Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1

30625 Hannover

    >