Download PDF
Semin Neurol 2001; 21(4): 353-358
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-19406
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Pearls and Pitfalls of Ethical Issues in Neurology

Michael P. McQuillen
  • Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 January 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The growth of bioethics as a practical, meaningful player in the arena of health care has paralleled that of clinical neurology not only in time but also in interaction between the two disciplines. Almost every advance in neurology has spawned an ethical dilemma, the unraveling of which has brought new insights to both fields of endeavor. The myriad ways in which this parallel growth has touched one clinical neurologist, the persons with whom he has been privileged to work, and those for whom they have cared is offered in reflection on the meaning of ethics, the essence of concepts such as ``brain death,'' the pain of truth telling, the complexity of informed consent, the societal dimension of the ``vegetative state,'' and finally, even the business of medicine. Should readers not find any pearls of wisdom in this offering, the author can at least hope it will prevent them from falling into the same pits.

KEYWORD

Bioethics - brain death - informed consent - health care reform

REFERENCES

  • 1 Rothman D J. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decisionmaking.  New York: Basic Books; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 2 . In re Quinlan. 70 NJ 10, 355 A2d 647 (1976)
    Google Scholar
  • 3 . Cruzan v Director. Missouri Department of Health, 110 SCt 2841 (1990)
    Google Scholar
  • 4 . A definition of irreversible coma: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death.  JAMA. 1968;  205 337-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Castenada C J. A new question amid suicide debate. USA Today. August 23, 1996;3A
    Google Scholar
  • 6 President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions: The Ethical, Social, and Legal Implications of Counseling and Education Programs.  Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1968
    Google Scholar
  • 7 McQuillen M P, Leone M G. A treatment carol: thymectomy revisited.  Neurology . 1977;  27 1103-1106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Khatri B O, McQuillen M P, Harrington G J, Schmoll D, Hoffman R G. Chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: double-blind controlled study of plasmapheresis in patients taking immunosuppressive drugs.  Neurology . 1985;  35 312-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bernat J L. Ethical Issues in Neurology. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics.  4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Lo B. Resolving Ethical Dilemmas: A Guide for Clinicians.  Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Fletcher J C, Lombardo P A, Marshall M F, Miller F G. Introduction to Clinical Ethics. 2nd ed. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Baumgarth W P, Regan R J. St. Thomas Aquinas. On Law, Morality, and Politics.  Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Fletcher J C, Quist N, Jonsen A R. Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Emanuel L L. Ethics and the structure of health care.  Camb Q Healthc Ethics . 2000;  9 151-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ropper A M. Unusual spontaneous movements in brain-dead patients.  Neurology . 1984;  34 1089-1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Glick R S. Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey's landmark legislative initiative.  Kennedy Inst Ethics J . 1991;  1 275-288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 . 10 NYCRR $400.16. (Department of Health Regulations)
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Younger S J, Arnold R M, Shapiro R. The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies.  Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Wu A W, Folkman S, McPhee S J, Lo B. Do house officers learn from their mistakes?.  JAMA . 1991;  265 2089-2094
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 . Schloendorff v Society of N.Y. Hospital. 211 NY 125, 105 NE 92 (1914)
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Pellegrino E D. Words can hurt you: some reflections on the metaphors of managed care.  J Am Board Fam Pract . 1994;  7 505-510
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Brody H. The Healer's Power.  New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Grilli T, Magrini N, Perma A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal.  Lancet . 2000;  355 103-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Maynard A. Evidence-based medicine: an incomplete method for informing treatment choices.  Lancet . 1997;  349 126-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Emery D D, Schneidermann L J. Cost-effectiveness analysis in health care.  Hastings Cent Rep . 1989;  19 8-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Dunphy S M, Cross J H. Medical decision-making for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.  West N E Law Rev . 1987;  9 152-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wikler D. Patient interests: clinical implications of philosophical distinctions.  J Am Geriatr Soc . 1985;  33 951-958
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Buchanan A E, Brock D W. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.  Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Steinbock B. Recovery from persistent vegetative state? The case of Carrie Coons.  Hastings Cent Rep . 1989;  19 14-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: a syndrome in search of a name.  Lancet . 1972;  1 734-737
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state.  N Engl J Med . 1994;  330 1499-1579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Andrews K. Patients in the persistent vegetative state: problems in their long-term management.  BMJ . 1993;  306 1600-1602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations in consciousness.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 1995;  76 205-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Schneidermann L J. Exile and PVS.  Hastings Cent Rep . 1990;  20 5-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bauby J D. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.  New York: Vintage Books 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Keneally T. Schindler's List.  New York: Simon & Schuster 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Tresch D D, Sims F H, Duthie Jr H E, Goldstein M D. Patients in a persistent vegetative state: attitudes and reactions of family members.  J Am Geriatr Soc . 1991;  39 17-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 McQuillen M P. The persistent vegetative state: consensus or confusion?.  Neurologist . 1996;  2 169-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lamm R D. Redrawing the ethics map.  Hastings Cent Rep . 1999;  29 28-29
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 . Pegram et al v Herdrich. 98 SCt 1949 (2000)
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Angell M. The doctor as double agent.  Kennedy Inst Ethics J . 1993;  3 279-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Osler W. Aequanimitas with Other Addresses.  Philadelphia: Blakiston 1952
    Google Scholar
      >