Semin intervent Radiol 2001; 18(4): 395-398
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-19100
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Adverse Patient Outcomes: A Closer Look at Radiology Malpractice Claims

Kathleen Dwyer
  • Risk Management Foundation, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 December 2001 (online)

ABSTRACT

This article outlines specific points of malpractice. These include error prevention research, claim data analysis, and specific case studies. The case studies are written in a manner that will allow the reader to understand the issues and problems with malpractice.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Leape L. Error in medicine.  JAMA . 1994;  272 1851-1857
  • 2 Phillips D. ``New Look'' reflects changing style of patient safety enhancement.  JAMA . 1999;  281 217-219
  • 3 Reason J. . Human Error Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 1990
  • 4 Kohn L T, Corrigan J M, Donaldson M S. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1999
  • 5 Leape L, Bates D, Cullen D. Systems analysis of adverse drug events.  JAMA . 1995;  274 35-43
  • 6 . . Data Sharing Reports Rockville, MD: Physicians Insurers Association of America 1996
  • 7 . . Medical Malpractice: Characteristics of Claims Closed in 1984 Publication No. GAO/HRD-87-55. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office 1987
  • 8 Berlin L. Malpractice issues in radiology. Emerging technologies.  AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1999;  173 267-270
  • 9 Berlin L, Hendrix R W. Perceptual errors and negligence.  AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1998;  170 863-867
  • 10 Wu A. Medical error: the second victim.  BMJ . 2000;  326 726-727
    >