Download PDF
Seminars in Neurosurgery 2001; 12(1): 081-092
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-13001
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Principles of Nerve Regeneration and Surgical Repair

Rajiv Midha1 , Margot Mackay2
  • 1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook& Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto.
  • 2Division of Biomedical Communication, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

In this article the principles of nerve anatomy, injury, and regeneration are first reviewed. This provides the basic background to consider and select patients who need surgical exploration and nerve repair. The principles of operative exploration and intraoperative management of nerve injury are discussed. Various conventional nerve repair techniques, including direct epineurial repair, grouped fascicular repair, fascicular repair, and nerve grafting, are described. The indications for use, as well as the relative advantages and disadvantages of each technique, are discussed. The experimental and clinical evidence from a review of the pertinent literature does not demonstrate a significant difference in outcome of one method over the others. Surgical decisions should be made by a thorough evaluation of all aspects of the nerve injury and surgical methods.

KEYWORD

Nerve graft - nerve injury - nerve repair - regeneration

REFERENCES

  • 1 Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function.  Brain . 1951;  74 491-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Midha R. Epidemiology of brachial plexus injuries in a multitrauma population.  Neurosurgery . 1997;  40(6) 1182-1189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Noble J, Munro C A, Prasad V S V S, Midha R. Analysis of upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of patients with multiple injuries.  J Trauma . 1998;  45(1) 116-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Midha R, Kline D G. Evaluation of the neuroma in continuity. In: Omer GE, Spinner M, Van Beek AL, eds. Management of Peripheral Nerve Problems Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company 1998: 319-327
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Waller A. Experiments on the section of the glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves of the frog, and observations of the alterations produced thereby in the strucutre of their primitive fibres.  Phil Trans Roy Soc (Lond) . 1850;  140 423-429
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Seddon H J, Medawar P B, Smith H. Rate of regeneration of peripheral nerves in man.  J Physiol . 1943;  102 191-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sunderland S. Rate of regeneration in human peripheral nerves.  Arch Neurol Psychiat . 1947;  58 251-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sunderland S. Rate of regeneration in human peripheral nerves: analysis of interval between injury and onset of recovery.  Arch Neurol Psychiat . 1947;  58(3) 291-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Morris J H. An electron microscope study of degeneration and regeneration in mammalian peripheral nerves. University of Oxford, 1971
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Morris J H, Hudson A R, Weddell G. A study of degeneration and regeneration in the divided rat sciatic nerve based on electron microscopy. III. Changes in the axons of the proximal stump.  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat . 1972;  124 131-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lundborg G. Structure and function of the intraneural microvessels as related to trauma, edema formation and nerve function.  J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1975;  57-A(7) 938-948
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mackinnon S E, Dellon A L. Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve.  New York: Thieme; 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Seddon H J. Surgical Disorders of the Peripheral Nerves.  Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1972
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hudson A R, Hunter D. Timing of peripheral nerve repair: important local neuropathologic factors.  Clin Neurosurg . 1977;  24 392-405
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kline D G, Hackett E R. Reappraisal of timing for exploration of civilian peripheral nerve injuries.  Surgery . 1975;  78 54-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kline D G, Nulsen F E. The neuroma in continuity: its preoperative and operative management.  Surg Clin North Am . 1972;  52(5) 1189-1209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kline D G, Happel L T. A quarter century's experience with intraoperative nerve action potential recording.  Can J Neurol Sci . 1993;  20 3-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tiel R L, Happel L T, Kline D G. Nerve action potential recording method and equipment.  Neurosurgery . 1996;  39(1) 103-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Brushart T ME. The mechanical and humoral control of specificity in nerve repair. In: Gelberman RH, ed. Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1991: 215-230
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Midha R, Mackay M S. Peripheral nerve suture techniques. In: Rengachary SS, ed. Neurosurgical Operative Atlas Chicago: AANA Publishing 1999: 261-269
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Best T J, Mackinnon S E, Evans P J. Peripheral nerve revascularization: histomorphometric study of small- and large-caliber grafts.  J Reconstruct Microsurg . 1999;  15(3) 183-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wilgis E FS. Techniques of epineural and group fascicular repair. In: Gelberman RH, ed. Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company 1991: 287-293
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Kline D G, Hudson A R. Nerve injuries: Operative Results from Major Nerve Injuries, Entrapments, and Tumors.  Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Millesi H, Meissl G, Berger A. The interfasicular nerve-grafting of the median and ulnar nerves.  J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1972;  54-A 727-750
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Terzis J. The nerve gap: suture under tension versus graft.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1975;  56(2) 166-170
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jabaley M E, Wallace W H, Heckler F R. Internal topography of major nerves of the forearm and hand: a current view.  J Hand Surg . 1980;  5(1) 1-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Levinthal R, Brown J, Rand R W. Comparison of fasicular, interfasicular, and epineurial suture techniques in the repair of simple nerve lacerations.  J Neurosurg . 1977;  47 744-750
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Orgel M G. Epineurial versus peripheral repair of peripheral nerves.  Clini Plast Surg . 1984;  11(1) 101-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ogata K, Naito M. Blood flow of preipheral nerve effects of dissection, stretching and compression.  J Hand Surg . 1986;  11B(1) 10-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hudson A R, Hunter D A, Kline D G, Bratton B R. Histological studies of experimental interfascicular graft repairs.  J Neurosurg . 1979;  51 333-340
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tupper J W. Fascicular repair. In: Gelberman RH, ed. Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1991: 295-303
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Clarke E, Bearn J G. The spinal nerve bands of Fontana.  Brain . 1972;  95 1-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Millesi H. Nerve grafting. In: Terzis JK, ed. Clinics in Plastic Surgery Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1984: 105-113
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Stromberg B V, Vlastou C, Earle A S. Effect of nerve graft polarity on nerve regeneration and function.  J Hand Surg . 1979;  5(4) 444-445
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Millesi H. Indications and techniques of nerve grafting. In: Gelberman RH, ed. Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1991: 525-543
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Sunderland S. The pros and cons of funicular nerve repair.  J Hand Surg . 1979;  4(3) 201-211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Zhong S Z, Wang G Y, He Y S, Sun B. The relationship between structural features of peripheral nerves and suture methods for nerve repair.  Microsurgery . 1988;  9 181-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sunderland S. Nerve and Nerve Injuries, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone; 1978 . 
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Nunley J A. Donor nerves for grafting. In: Gelberman RH, ed. Biopsy Diagnosis of Peripheral Neuropathy Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company 1991: 545-552
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Moneim M S. Interfascicular nerve grafting.  Clin Orthop Related Research . 1982;  163 65-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Whitcomb B B. Separation at the suture site as a cause of failure in regeneration of peripheral nerves.  J Neurosurg . 1946;  3 399-406
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Miyamoto Y. Experimental study of results of nerve suture under tension vs.  nerve grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1979;  64 540-549
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Rodkey W G, Maj D VM, Cabaud E, McCarroll H R. Neurorrhaphy after loss of a nerve segment: comparison of epineurial suture under tension versus multiple nerve grafts.  J Hand Surg . 1980;  5(4) 366-371
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bratton B R, Kline D G, Coleman W, Hudson A R. Experimental interfascicular nerve grafting.  J Neurosurg . 1979;  51 323-332
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Wong A YC, Scott J JA. Functional recovery following direct or graft repair of nerve gaps in the rat.  Exp Neurol . 1991;  114 364-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >