Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778683
Original Research

Implantation Corridors in Canine Thoracic Vertebrae: A Morphometric Study in Dogs of Varying Sizes

Julianna C. Sabol
1   Comparative Neuroimmunology and Neuro-oncology Laboratory, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
2   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
,
1   Comparative Neuroimmunology and Neuro-oncology Laboratory, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
2   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
3   Comparative Medicine Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective Surgical stabilization to treat fractures, luxations, and congenital malformations in the thoracic spine can be difficult due to its unique anatomy and surrounding structures. Our objective was to document the morphometrics of the thoracic vertebrae relating to an ideal trajectory for dorsolateral implant placement in a variety of dog sizes and to assess proximity to important adjacent critical anatomical structures using computed tomography (CT) studies.

Study Design Medical records for 30 dogs with thoracic CT were evaluated. Implantation corridor parameters for thoracic vertebrae (T1–T13) were measured, including the length, width, angle from midline, and allowable deviation angle for corridors simulated using an ideal implant trajectory. The distances from each vertebra to the trachea, lungs, aorta, subclavian artery, and azygos vein were also measured.

Results Implantation corridor widths were often very narrow, particularly in the mid-thoracic region, and allowable deviation angles were frequently small. Distances to critical anatomical structures were often less than 1 mm, even in larger dogs.

Conclusion Thoracic implantation requires substantial precision to avoid breaching the canal, ineffective implant placement, and potential life-threatening complications resulting from invasion of surrounding anatomical structures.

Ethical Approval Statement

This study was conducted on CT images previously obtained and archived during the course of a routine diagnostic evaluation in canine patients. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approval is not required for such studies at our institution.


Note

This study was presented in part at the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Annual Forum, Austin, Texas, United States, 2022 (poster).


Authors' Contribution

J.C.S. contributed to the study design, identified cases, performed the morphometric analyses, interpreted and analyzed the results, and wrote and revised the manuscript. C.L.M. designed the study, interpreted and analyzed the results, and wrote and revised the manuscript.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 16 January 2023

Accepted: 15 December 2023

Article published online:
22 January 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Sharp NJH, Wheeler SJ. Small Animal Spinal Disorders: Diagnosis and Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2005: 379
  • 2 Aikawa T, Kanazono S, Yoshigae Y, Sharp NJ, Muñana KR. Vertebral stabilization using positively threaded profile pins and polymethylmethacrylate, with or without laminectomy, for spinal canal stenosis and vertebral instability caused by congenital thoracic vertebral anomalies. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (05) 432-441
  • 3 Bagley RS. Spinal fracture or luxation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000; 30 (01) 133-153 , vi–vii
  • 4 Blass CE, Seim HB. Spinal fixation in dogs using Steinmann pins and methylmethacrylate. Vet Surg 1984; 13: 203-210
  • 5 Watine S, Cabassu JP, Catheland S, Brochier L, Ivanoff S. Computed tomography study of implantation corridors in canine vertebrae. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47 (11) 651-657
  • 6 Wheeler JL, Cross AR, Rapoff AJ. A comparison of the accuracy and safety of vertebral body pin placement using a fluoroscopically guided versus an open surgical approach: an in vitro study. Vet Surg 2002; 31 (05) 468-474
  • 7 Schmitt EM, Early P, Bergman R. et al. Computed tomography evaluation of proposed implant corridors in canine thoracic vertebrae. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (07) 1427-1433
  • 8 Krauss MW, Theyse LF, Tryfonidou MA, Hazewinkel HA, Meij BP. Treatment of spinal fractures using Lubra plates. A retrospective clinical and radiological evaluation of 15 cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25 (04) 326-331
  • 9 McAnulty JF, Lenehan TM, Maletz LM. Modified segmental spinal instrumentation in repair of spinal fractures and luxations in dogs. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 143-149
  • 10 Voss K, Montavon PM. Tension band stabilization of fractures and luxations of the thoracolumbar vertebrae in dogs and cats: 38 cases (1993-2002). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 225 (01) 78-83
  • 11 Mathiesen CB, de la Puerta B, Groth AM, Rutherford S, Cappello R. Ventral stabilization of thoracic kyphosis through bilateral intercostal thoracotomies using SOP (String of Pearls) plates contoured after a 3-dimensional print of the spine. Vet Surg 2018; 47 (06) 843-851
  • 12 Cabassu J, Moissonnier P. Surgical treatment of a vertebral fracture associated with a haematogenous osteomyelitis in a dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20 (03) 227-230
  • 13 Guiot LP, Allman DA. Median sternotomy and ventral stabilisation using pins and polymethylmethacrylate for a comminuted T5 vertebral fracture in a Miniature Schnauzer. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24 (01) 76-83
  • 14 Wheeler JL, Lewis DD, Cross AR, Sereda CW. Closed fluoroscopic-assisted spinal arch external skeletal fixation for the stabilization of vertebral column injuries in five dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (05) 442-448
  • 15 Guevar J, Samer ES, Precht C, Rathmann JMK, Forterre F. Accuracy and safety of neuronavigation for minimally invasive stabilization in the thoracolumbar spine using polyaxial screws-rod: a canine cadaveric proof of concept. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2022; 35 (06) 370-380
  • 16 Elford JH, Oxley B, Behr S. Accuracy of placement of pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine of dogs with spinal deformities with three-dimensionally printed patient-specific drill guides. Vet Surg 2020; 49 (02) 347-353
  • 17 Fujioka T, Nakata K, Nishida H. et al. A novel patient-specific drill guide template for stabilization of thoracolumbar vertebrae of dogs: cadaveric study and clinical cases. Vet Surg 2019; 48 (03) 336-342
  • 18 Mariani CL, Zlotnick JA, Harrysson O. et al. Accuracy of three-dimensionally printed animal-specific drill guides for implant placement in canine thoracic vertebrae: a cadaveric study. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (02) 294-302
  • 19 Guevar J, Bleedorn J, Cullum T, Hetzel S, Zlotnick J, Mariani CL. Accuracy and safety of three-dimensionally printed animal-specific drill guides for thoracolumbar vertebral column instrumentation in dogs: bilateral and unilateral designs. Vet Surg 2021; 50 (02) 336-344
  • 20 Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE. et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (02) 247-255
  • 21 Mason A, Paulsen R, Babuska JM. et al. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 20 (02) 196-203
  • 22 Pan Y, Lü GH, Kuang L, Wang B. Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent patients with severe spinal deformities: a retrospective study comparing drill guide template with free-hand technique. Eur Spine J 2018; 27 (02) 319-326
  • 23 Liu K, Zhang Q, Li X. et al. Preliminary application of a multi-level 3D printing drill guide template for pedicle screw placement in severe and rigid scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2017; 26 (06) 1684-1689
  • 24 Cecchinato R, Berjano P, Zerbi A, Damilano M, Redaelli A, Lamartina C. Pedicle screw insertion with patient-specific 3D-printed guides based on low-dose CT scan is more accurate than free-hand technique in spine deformity patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Eur Spine J 2019; 28 (07) 1712-1723
  • 25 Garg B, Gupta M, Singh M, Kalyanasundaram D. Outcome and safety analysis of 3D-printed patient-specific pedicle screw jigs for complex spinal deformities: a comparative study. Spine J 2019; 19 (01) 56-64
  • 26 Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, Mohsen A. Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (03) 370-375
  • 27 Meng XT, Guan XF, Zhang HL, He SS. Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2016; 39 (03) 385-391
  • 28 Li HM, Zhang RJ, Shen CL. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted technique versus conventional freehand technique in spine surgery from nine randomized controlled trials: a meta-analysis. Spine 2020; 45 (02) E111-E119