Semin Thromb Hemost 2023; 49(05): 542-552
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756707
Review Article

Mechanical Heart Valves, Pregnancy, and Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Carina Jakobsen
1   Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark
,
Julie Brogaard Larsen
1   Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark
2   Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
,
Jens Fuglsang
2   Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark
,
Anne-Mette Hvas
4   Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Anticoagulant therapy is essential in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves to prevent valve thrombosis. The risk of bleeding complications in these patients has not gained much attention. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the prevalence of bleeding peri-partum and post-partum in women with mechanical heart valves and also investigate whether bleeding risk differed across anticoagulant regimens or according to delivery mode. The present study was conducted according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies reporting bleeding prevalence in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves receiving anticoagulant therapy were identified through PubMed and Embase on December 08, 2021. Data on bleeding complications, delivery mode, and anticoagulation therapy were extracted. A total of 37 studies were included, reporting 423 bleeding complications in 2,508 pregnancies. A meta-analysis calculated a pooled prevalence of 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09–0.18) bleeding episodes per pregnancy across anticoagulant regimens. The combination of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and single VKA therapy showed the lowest risk of bleeding (8 and 12%). Unexpectedly, the highest risk of bleeding was found in women receiving a combination of low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) and VKA (33%) or mono-therapy with LMWH (22%). However, this could be dose related. No difference in bleeding was found between caesarean section versus vaginal delivery (p = 0.08). In conclusion, bleeding episodes are common during pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valves receiving anticoagulant therapy. A combination of UFH and VKA or VKA monotherapy showed the lowest risk of bleeding.



Publication History

Article published online:
29 September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 van Hagen IM, Roos-Hesselink JW, Ruys TPE. et al; Pregnancy in women with a mechanical heart valve: data of the European Society of Cardiology Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease (ROPAC). Circulation 2015; 132 (02) 132-142
  • 2 Vause S, Clarke B, Tower CL, Hay C, Knight M. (on behalf of UKOSS). Pregnancy outcomes in women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves: a prospective descriptive population based study using the United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) data collection system. BJOG 2017; 124 (09) 1411-1419
  • 3 Akhtar RP, Abid AR, Zafar H, Cheema MA, Khan JS. Anticoagulation in pregnancy with mechanical heart valves: 10-year experience. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2007; 15 (06) 497-501
  • 4 Mihaljevic T, Paul S, Leacche M, Rawn JD, Cohn LH, Byrne JG. Valve replacement in women of childbearing age: influences on mother, fetus and neonate. J Heart Valve Dis 2005; 14 (02) 151-157
  • 5 Ayad SW, Hassanein MM, Mohamed EA, Gohar AM. Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with a prosthetic mechanical heart valve. Clin Med Insights Cardiol 2016; 10: 11-17
  • 6 Abildgaard U, Sandset PM, Hammerstrøm J, Gjestvang FT, Tveit A. Management of pregnant women with mechanical heart valve prosthesis: thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin. Thromb Res 2009; 124 (03) 262-267
  • 7 Casele HL. The use of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49 (04) 895-905
  • 8 Khamooshi AJ, Kashfi F, Hoseini S, Tabatabaei MB, Javadpour H, Noohi F. Anticoagulation for prosthetic heart valves in pregnancy. Is there an answer?. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2007; 15 (06) 493-496
  • 9 Regitz-Zagrosek V, Blomstrom Lundqvist C, Borghi C. et al; ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32 (24) 3147-3197
  • 10 Ranjan R, Adhikary D, Saha SK, Mandal S, Hasan K, Adhikary AB. Impact of prosthetic heart valves on pregnancy in Bangladeshi women. Perfusion 2019; 34 (06) 446-452
  • 11 Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO. et al; Writing Committee Members. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77 (04) e25-e197
  • 12 İşcan HZ, Hanedan MO, Özen A. et al. Anticoagulation therapy in pregnant women with mechanical heart valve. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg 2018; 26 (01) 38-44
  • 13 Kim BJ, An SJ, Shim SS. et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with mechanical heart valves. J Reprod Med 2006; 51 (08) 649-654
  • 14 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151 (04) 264-269 , W64
  • 15 National Heart. Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, last update July 2021 Study Quality Assessment Tools. Accessed December 22, 2021, at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
  • 16 Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health 2014; 72 (01) 39
  • 17 Lee JH, Park NH, Keum DY, Choi SY, Kwon KY, Cho CH. Low molecular weight heparin treatment in pregnant women with a mechanical heart valve prosthesis. J Korean Med Sci 2007; 22 (02) 258-261
  • 18 Basude S, Hein C, Curtis SL, Clark A, Trinder J. Low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin for anticoagulation in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: what are the risks? A retrospective observational study. BJOG 2012; 119 (08) 1008-1013 , discussion 1012–1013
  • 19 Kim KH, Jeong DS, Ahn H. Anticoagulation in pregnant women with a bileaflet mechanical cardiac valve replacement. Heart Surg Forum 2007; 10 (04) E267-E270
  • 20 Shannon MS, Edwards MB, Long F, Taylor KM, Bagger JP, De Swiet M. Anticoagulant management of pregnancy following heart valve replacement in the United Kingdom, 1986-2002. J Heart Valve Dis 2008; 17 (05) 526-532
  • 21 Vural KM, Ozatik MA, Uncu H. et al. Pregnancy after mechanical mitral valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 2003; 12 (03) 370-376
  • 22 Saeed CR, Jacobson BF, Pravin M, Aziz RH, Serasheini M, Dominique TG. A prospective trial showing the safety of adjusted-dose enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis of pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2011; 17 (04) 313-319
  • 23 Al-Lawati AAM, Venkitraman M, Al-Delaime T, Valliathu J. Pregnancy and mechanical heart valves replacement; dilemma of anticoagulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22 (02) 223-227
  • 24 Bian C, Qi X, Li L, Zhao J, Liu X. Anticoagulant management of pregnant women with mechanical heart valve replacement during perioperative period. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 293 (01) 69-74
  • 25 Lameijer H, van Slooten YJ, Jongbloed MRM. et al. Biological versus mechanical heart valve prosthesis during pregnancy in women with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2018; 268: 106-112
  • 26 Güner A, Kalçık M, Gürsoy MO. et al. Comparison of different anticoagulation regimens regarding maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves (from the multicenter ANATOLIA-PREG Registry). Am J Cardiol 2020; 127: 113-119
  • 27 Khader KA, Saad AS, Abdelshafy M. Pregnancy outcome in women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or enoxaparin. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2016; 66 (05) 321-326
  • 28 Mazibuko B, Ramnarain H, Moodley J. An audit of pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves at a tertiary hospital in South Africa: a five-year experience. Cardiovasc J S Afr 2012; 23 (04) 216-221
  • 29 Yinon Y, Siu SC, Warshafsky C. et al. Use of low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104 (09) 1259-1263
  • 30 Khamoushi AJ, Kashfi F, Hosseini S, Alizadeh Ghavidel AR, Samiei N, Haddadzadeh M. Anti-coagulation during pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valves: a prospective study. Int J Fertil Steril 2011; 5 (01) 47-51
  • 31 Soma-Pillay P, Nene Z, Mathivha TM, Macdonald AP. The effect of warfarin dosage on maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves. Obstet Med 2011; 4 (01) 24-27
  • 32 McLintock C, McCowan LM, North RA. Maternal complications and pregnancy outcome in women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves treated with enoxaparin. BJOG 2009; 116 (12) 1585-1592
  • 33 Kariv S, Azibani F, Baard J. et al. Haemorrhage and other complications in pregnant women on anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves: a prospective observational cohort study. Cardiovasc J S Afr 2018; 29 (05) 289-295
  • 34 Bian C, Wei Q, Liu X. Influence of heart-valve replacement of warfarin anticoagulant therapy on perinatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285 (02) 347-351
  • 35 Geelani MA, Singh S, Verma A, Nagesh A, Betigeri V, Nigam M. Anticoagulation in patients with mechanical valves during pregnancy. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2005; 13 (01) 30-33
  • 36 Sillesen M, Hjortdal V, Vejlstrup N, Sørensen K. Pregnancy with prosthetic heart valves - 30 years' nationwide experience in Denmark. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40 (02) 448-454
  • 37 Plesinac SD, Darko PV, Pilic IZ, Babovic IR. Anticoagulation therapy during pregnancy of patients with artificial heart valves: fetomaternal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006; 274 (03) 141-145
  • 38 Suri V, Keepanasseril A, Aggarwal N. et al. Mechanical valve prosthesis and anticoagulation regimens in pregnancy: a tertiary centre experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 159 (02) 320-323
  • 39 Quinn J, Von Klemperer K, Brooks R, Peebles D, Walker F, Cohen H. Use of high intensity adjusted dose low molecular weight heparin in women with mechanical heart valves during pregnancy: a single-center experience. Haematologica 2009; 94 (11) 1608-1612
  • 40 Cousin B, Guglielminotti J, Iung B, Montravers P. Retrospective study of anaesthetic management of pregnancy patients with mechanical heart valve prosthesis and anticoagulants. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2018; 37 (03) 225-231
  • 41 Nassar AH, Hobeika EM, Abd Essamad HM, Taher A, Khalil AM, Usta IM. Pregnancy outcome in women with prosthetic heart valves. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (03) 1009-1013
  • 42 Popelova J, Zaticil T, Vavera Z. et al. Mechanical heart valve prosthesis in pregnancy – multicenter retrospective observational study. Cor Vasa 2012; 54: E217-E222
  • 43 Keepanasseril A, Pillai AA, Baghel J. et al. Alternatives to low molecular weight heparin for anticoagulation in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves in middle-income countries: a cohort study. Glob Heart 2021; 16 (01) 68
  • 44 Santos FD, Baris L, Varley A. et al. Mechanical heart valves and pregnancy: Issues surrounding anticoagulation. Experience from two obstetric cardiac centers. Obstet Med 2021; 14 (02) 95-101
  • 45 Steinberg ZL, Dominguez-Islas CP, Otto CM, Stout KK, Krieger EV. Maternal and fetal outcomes of anticoagulation in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69 (22) 2681-2691
  • 46 Carroli G, Cuesta C, Abalos E, Gulmezoglu AM. Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 22 (06) 999-1012