The Surgeon Mentor Program: Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty via the Direct Anterior Approach

Abstract

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty has been increasing in popularity due to potential benefits including less pain, faster recovery, decreased risk of dislocation, and a reduced length of stay. The DAA has been described by many to have a steep learning curve owing to its greater risk of complications when first using the approach. The primary aim of this study was to design and implement a specific surgeon mentor program in an attempt to reduce the learning curve of the DAA. Surgeons completed the surgical education and mentoring program designed to reduce the initial increase in complication rate when first learning the DAA in a public hospital setting. A retrospective review of clinical and radiological outcomes on the first 67 cases was then conducted. Of these, 43 cases were eligible for inclusion. The 43 patients in this study had a mean age of 66.7, BMI of 26.7, and 57% of them were female. Follow-up was between 39 and 49 months, with a mean of 46 months. There were no fractures, dislocations, or blood transfusions. One patient required revision for deep infection. The mean length of stay was 2.81 days. At 6 weeks postoperative, 86% were independently mobile, 9.3% were using a cane, and 4.7% were being weaned off a walker. The radiological assessments found a mean cup abduction of 39.9 ± 5.1 degrees, mean femoral offset of 1.6 ± 5.5 mm, and a total hip offset of 1.3 ± 7 mm greater than the contralateral hip. Patients had a mean leg length discrepancy of −0.9 ± 5.9 mm. In conclusion, a surgeon mentoring program was designed and implemented to reduce the learning curve of the DAA in our center, with satisfactory 3-year clinical and radiological outcomes achieved. This study provides preliminary support for the potential utility of the mentoring program in facilitating other centers in safely introducing the DAA into their practice without an initial increase in complication rate.

Keywords

total hip arthroplasty - learning curve - direct anterior approach - Smith-Peterson - mentor

Publication History

Received: 30 March 2021

Accepted: 10 August 2021

Article published online:
22 September 2021

• References

• 1 Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (03) 419-434
• 2 Patel NN, Shah JA, Erens GA. Current trends in clinical practice for the direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (09) 1987-1993.e3 , e3
• 3 Lee GC, Marconi D. Complications following direct anterior hip procedures: costs to both patients and surgeons. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (Suppl. 09) 98-101
• 4 Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (426) 164-173
• 5 Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ. et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (15) 1392-1398
• 6 Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441 (441) 115-124
• 7 de Steiger RN, Lorimer M, Solomon M. What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (12) 3860-3866
• 8 Seng BE, Berend KR, Ajluni AF, Lombardi Jr AV. Anterior-supine minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: defining the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am 2009; 40 (03) 343-350
• 9 Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Ad Hoc Report No.:2807, procedures from 1 Sept 1999 to 31 December 2018. Adelaide: AOANJRR Database; 2019
• 10 McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (261) 159-170
• 11 Dastane M, Dorr LD, Tarwala R, Wan Z. Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty: quantitative measurement with navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (02) 429-436
• 12 Konyves A, Bannister GC. The importance of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (02) 155-157
• 13 Sarangi PP, Bannister GC. Leg length discrepancy after total hip replacement. Hip Int 1997; 7 (03) 121-124
• 14 Christensen CP, Karthikeyan T, Jacobs CA. Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (09) 1839-1841
• 15 Masonis J, Thompson C, Odum S. Safe and accurate: learning the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (12 Suppl 2): 1417-1426
• 16 Domb BG, Chen JW, Kyin C. et al. Primary robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 501 hips with 44-month follow-up. Orthopedics 2021; 44 (02) 70-76
• 17 Sires JD, Craik JD, Wilson CJ. Accuracy of bone resection in MAKO total knee robotic-assisted surgery. J Knee Surg 2021; 34 (07) 745-748