Nervenheilkunde 2005; 24(05): 381-387
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1629978
Geist & Gehirn
Schattauer GmbH

Therapiealgorithmen in der Depressionsbehandlung — Das Berliner Algorithmusprojekt

Algorithms in the treatment of depression – The German Algorithm Project („Berliner Algorithmusprojekt”)
K. Wiethoff
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité Campus Mitte Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
M. Bauer
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité Campus Mitte Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
T. Baghai
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité Campus Mitte Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
A. Heinz
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité Campus Mitte Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
,
M. Adli
1   Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité Campus Mitte Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 January 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Therapieresistenz stellt in der Depressionsbehandlung nach wie vor ein großes Problem dar. Als ein Mittel zur Optimierung der Behandlung depressiver Erkrankungen gelten Therapiealgorithmen, bei denen es sich um explizite und systematisierte Behandlungsprotokolle handelt. Sie enthalten standardisierte Handlungsanweisungen für therapeutische Entscheidungen, die Diagnosestellung, Definition des Therapieziels, Definition der Kontrollinstrumente und Kontrolle des Therapieerfolges in einem zeitlich festgelegten Rahmen. Ziel des mehrphasigen Berliner Algorithmusprojekt ist die Evaluierung algorithmusgestützter Depressionsbehandlung im Vergleich zur üblichen Therapie nach freier Arztentscheidung. Darüber hinaus werden verschiedene Folgestrategien bei Patienten, die nicht adäquat auf eine initiale antidepressive Monotherapie angesprochen haben, miteinander verglichen. Die vorläufigen Ergebnisse dieser und weiterer Algorithmusstudien zeigen den Nutzen systematischer Therapiealgorithmen in der Depressionsbehandlung in Bezug auf das Therapieergebnis, die Qualität der Behandlung, gesundheitsökonomische Parameter und die Zufriedenheit der Patienten.

Summary

Treatment resistance remains a major clinical problem in the therapy of major depression. Algorithms are explicit and systematic treatment protocols. They are considered as key instruments in optimizing the therapy of depressive disorders. Treatment algorithms base on standardized procedures for medical decision making, diagnostic consideration, definition of the aim of treatments, definition of evaluation instruments and evaluation of treatment response, all of which within a predefined timeframe. The multiphasic German Algorithm Project („Berliner Algorithmusprojekt”) aims at comparing algorithm guided treatment with treatment as usual. Furthermore it compares different “second-step-strategies” in case of non-response to an initial antidepressant monotherapy. The preliminary results of this ongoing project and other algorithm studies show the benefit of treatment algorithms for treatment outcome, therapy quality, cost-effectiveness and patients’ satisfaction.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Adli M, Berghöfer A, Linden M, Helmchen H, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Mackert A, Stamm T, Bauer M. Effectiveness and feasibility of a standardized stepwise drug treatment algorithm for inpatients with depressive disorders – results of a two-year observational study. J Clin Psychiatr 2002; 63: 782-90.
  • 2 Adli M, Rush AJ, Moller HJ, Bauer M. Algorithms for optimizing the treatment of depression: making the right decision at the right time. Pharmacopsychiatry 2003; 36 (Suppl. 03) 222-9.
  • 3 Adli M, Wiethoff K, Baghai T, Bauer M. Algorithmusgestützte Behandlung stationärer Patienten mit depressiven Erkrankungen: das Berliner Algorithmusprojekt. In: Bauer M, Berghöfer A, Adli M. (Hrsg). Therapieresistente Depressionen. Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer; 2005
  • 4 American Psychiatric Association (APA). Practice guideline for major depressive disorder in adults. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150: 1-26.
  • 5 Amsterdam JD, Hornig-Rohan M. Treatment algorithms in treatment-resistant depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1996; 19: 371-86.
  • 6 Bauer M, Linden M, Smolka MN, Kiesslinger U, Neu P, Adli M. Effectiveness of an algorithm-guided treatment regimen compared to treatment as usual: a randomized controlled study of inpatients with depression. Eingereicht.
  • 7 Bauer M, Whybrow PC, Angst J, Versiani M, Möller HJ. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders, Part 1: acute and continuation treatment of major depressive disorder. World J Biol Psychiatr 2002; 3: 5-43.
  • 8 Bech P, Rafaelsen OJ. The melancholia scale: development, consistency, validity and utility. In Sartorius N, Ban TA. (eds). Assessment of Depression. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1986
  • 9 Crismon ML, Trivedi MH, Pigott TA. et al. The Texas Medication Algorithm Project: Report of the Texas consensus conference panel on medication treatment of major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatr 1999; 60: 142-56.
  • 10 Eisenberg L. Treating depression and anxiety in primary care: closing the gap between knowledge and practice. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1080-4.
  • 11 Faltermaier-Temizel M, Laakmann G, Baghai T, Kuhn K. Prädiktive Faktoren für den Therapieerfolg beim depressiven Syndrom. Nervenarzt 1997; 68: 62-6.
  • 12 Fava M, Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, et al. Background and rationale for the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2003; 26: 457-94.
  • 13 Flint AJ, Rifat SL. The effect of sequential antidepressant treatment on geriatric depression. J Affect Dis 1996; 36: 95-105.
  • 14 Friedman RA, Koesis JH. Pharmacotherapy for chronic depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1996; 19: 121-32.
  • 15 Gilbert DA, Altshuler KZ, Rago WV. et al. Texas Medication Algorithm Project: definitions, rationale, and methods to develop medication algorithms. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59: 345-51.
  • 16 Guscott R, Grof P. The clinical meaning of refractory depression: A review for the clinician. Am J Psychiatry 1991; 148: 695-704.
  • 17 Hamilton M. The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. In: Sartorius N, Ban TA. (eds). Assessment of Depression. Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer; 1986
  • 18 Hawley CJ, Pattinson HA, Quick SJ, Echlin D, Smith V, McPhee S, Sivakumaran T. A protocol for the pharmacologic treatment of major depression. A field test of a potential prototype. J Affect Disord 1998; 47: 87-96.
  • 19 Helmchen H. Gestuftes Vorgehen bei Resistenz gegen Antidepressiva-Therapie. In: Möller HJ. (Hrsg). Therapieresistenz unter Antidepressiva-Behandlung. Berlin: Springer; 1990
  • 20 Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Maser JD. et al. A prospective 12-year study of subsyndromal and syndromal depressive symptoms in unipolar major depressive disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55: 694-700.
  • 21 Katon W, Russo J, von KorffM, Lin E, Simon G, Bush T, Ludman E, Walker E. Long-term effects of a collaborative care intervention in persistently depressed primay care patients. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17: 741-8.
  • 22 Katon W, von KorffM, Lin E, Simon G, Walker E, Unützer J, Bush T, Russo J, Ludman E. Stepped collaborative care for primary care patients with persistent symptoms of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatr 1999; 56: 1109-15.
  • 23 Katon W, Von KorffM, Lin E, Walker E, Simon GE, Bush T, Robinson P, Russo J. Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. Impact on depression in primary care. JAMA 1995; 273: 1026-31.
  • 24 Linden M, Helmchen H, Mackert A, Müller-Oerlinghausen B. Structure and feasibility of a standardized stepwise drug treatment regimen (SSTR) for depressed inpatients. Pharmacopsychiatr 1994; 27 (Suppl): 51-3.
  • 25 Linden M. Der Einfluss von Leitlinien, Standards und ökonomischen Vorgaben auf medizinische Entscheidungsprozesse. ZäFQ 2004; 98: 200-5.
  • 26 Möller HJ. Therapieresistenz auf Antidepressiva: Definition, Häufigkeit, Prädiktoren und Interventionsmöglichkeiten. Nervenarzt 2004; 75: 499-517.
  • 27 Mulsant BH, Alexopoulos GS, Reynolds CF. et al. Pharmacological treatment of depression in older primary care patients: the PROSPECT alorithm. Int J of Geriatric Psychiatry 2001; 16: 585-92.
  • 28 Murray C, Lopez A. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: global burden of disease study. Lancet 1997; 349: 1498-504.
  • 29 Nierenberg AA, Amsterdam JD. Treatment-resistant depression: definition and treatment approaches. J Clin Psychiatry 1990; 51 (Suppl. 06) 39-47.
  • 30 Nolen WA, Haffmans J. Treatment of resistant depression. Review on the efficacy of various biological treatments, specifically in major depression resistant to cyclic antidepressants. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1989; 4: 217-28.
  • 31 Paykel ES. et al. Residual symptoms after partial remission: an important outcome in depression. Psychol Med 1995; 25: 1171-80.
  • 32 Rush AJ. Algorithmusgestützte Behandlung der Depression. In: Bauer M, Berghöfer A, Adli M. (Hrsg). Therapieresistente Depressionen. Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer; 2005
  • 33 Rush AJ. et al. Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design. Control Clin Trials 2004; 25: 119-42.
  • 34 Rush AJ, Crismon ML, Kashner TM. Texas Medication Algorithm Project, Phase 3 (TMAP-3): Rationale and Study Design. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64: 357-69.
  • 35 Rush AJ, Rago WV, Crismon ML. et al. Medication treatment for the severely and persistently ill: the Texas medication algorithm project. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 60: 284-91.
  • 36 Rush AJ. Preface. In: Rush AJ. (ed). Mood Disorders. Systematic Medication Management. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry. Vol. 25. Basel: Karger; 1997
  • 37 Salize et al. Behandlungskosten von Patienten mit Depressionsdiagnose in Haus- und fachärztlicher Versorgung in Deutschland. Psychiatrische Praxis 2004; 31: 147-56.
  • 38 Thase ME, Rush AJ. Treatment-resistant depression. In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ. (eds). Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress. New York: Raven Press; 1995
  • 39 Toprac MG. et al. The Texas Medication Algorithm Project. Patient and family education program; a consumer guided initiative. J of Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61: 477-86.
  • 40 Trivedi MH, Rush MD AJ, Crismon ML, Kashner TM, Toprac MG, Carmody TJ, Key T, Biggs MM, Shores-Wilson K, Witte B, Suppes T, Miller AL, Altshuler KZ, Shon SP. Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP): Clinical Results for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. Arch Gen Psychiat 2004; 61: 669-80.
  • 41 Unützer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, Williams Jr JW, Hunkeler E, Harpole L, Hoffing M, Della PennaRD, Noel PH, Lin EH, Arean PA, Hegel MT, Tang L, Belin TR, Oishi S, Langston C. Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 2836-45.
  • 42 Wisniewski SR, Stegman D, Trivedi M, Husain MM, Eng H, Shores-Wilson K, Luther J, Biggs MM, Burroughs D, Ritz AL, Fava M, Quitkin F, Rush AJ. Methods of testing feasibility for sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D). J Psychiat Res 2004; 38: 241-8.
  • 43 Wittchen HU. Epidemiology of affective disorders. In: Helmchen H, Henn F, Lauter H, Sartorius N. (eds). Contemporary Psychiatry. Vol. 3. Heidelberg: Springer; 2000