Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2015; 19(05): 446-455
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569256
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reduction of Metal Artifact with Dual-Energy CT: Virtual Monospectral Imaging with Fast Kilovoltage Switching and Metal Artifact Reduction Software

Eric Pessis
1   Department of Radiology, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint Denis, France
2   Department of Radiology B, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
,
Jean-Michel Sverzut
1   Department of Radiology, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint Denis, France
,
Raphaël Campagna
2   Department of Radiology B, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
,
Henri Guerini
2   Department of Radiology B, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
,
Antoine Feydy
2   Department of Radiology B, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
,
Jean-Luc Drapé
2   Department of Radiology B, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
22. Dezember 2015 (online)

Abstract

Imaging of patients with metal implants is a common activity for radiologists, and overcoming metal artifacts during computed tomography (CT) is still a challenge. Virtual monochromatic spectral (VMS) imaging with dual-energy CT has been reported to reduce beam-hardening metal artifact effectively. Dual-energy CT allows the synthesis of VMS images. Monochromatic images depict how the imaged object would look if the X-ray source produced X-ray photons at only a single-energy level. For this reason, VMS imaging improve image quality by reducing beam-hardening artifacts. Additional metal artifact reduction postprocessing such as metal artifact reduction software can be applied to improve the visualization of the bone–prosthesis interface, periprosthetic areas, and soft tissue near and far from the metal implant. This article summarizes how virtual monochromatic images are synthesized from dual-energy CT, and it describes and illustrates our clinical experience with a single-source dual-energy scanner with fast kilovoltage switching to reduce beam hardening in patients with metal implants.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gondim Teixeira PA, Meyer JB, Baumann C , et al. Total hip prosthesis CT with single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction: impact on the visualization of specific periprosthetic soft tissue structures. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43 (9) 1237-1246
  • 2 Han SC, Chung YE, Lee YH, Park KK, Kim MJ, Kim KW. Metal artifact reduction software used with abdominopelvic dual-energy CT of patients with metal hip prostheses: assessment of image quality and clinical feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203 (4) 788-795
  • 3 Liu PT, Pavlicek WP, Peter MB, Spangehl MJ, Roberts CC, Paden RG. Metal artifact reduction image reconstruction algorithm for CT of implanted metal orthopedic devices: a work in progress. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38 (8) 797-802
  • 4 Lee MJ, Kim S, Lee SA , et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. Radiographics 2007; 27 (3) 791-803
  • 5 Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004; 24 (6) 1679-1691
  • 6 Kaza RK, Platt JF, Cohan RH, Caoili EM, Al-Hawary MM, Wasnik A. Dual-energy CT with single- and dual-source scanners: current applications in evaluating the genitourinary tract. Radiographics 2012; 32 (2) 353-369
  • 7 Pessis E, Campagna R, Sverzut JM , et al. Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: reduction of metal artifacts at CT. Radiographics 2013; 33 (2) 573-583
  • 8 Silva AC, Morse BG, Hara AK, Paden RG, Hongo N, Pavlicek W. Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging. Radiographics 2011; 31 (4) 1031-1046 ; discussion 1047–1050
  • 9 Yu L, Leng S, McCollough CH. Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199 (5, Suppl): S9-S15
  • 10 Matsumoto K, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y, Ueno A, Yamada M, Kuribayashi S. Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: improved image quality as compared with that obtained with conventional 120-kVp CT. Radiology 2011; 259 (1) 257-262
  • 11 Cyteval C, Hamm V, Sarrabère MP, Lopez FM, Maury P, Taourel P. Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis: CT imaging. Radiology 2002; 224 (2) 477-483
  • 12 Brook OR, Gourtsoyianni S, Brook A, Mahadevan A, Wilcox C, Raptopoulos V. Spectral CT with metal artifacts reduction software for improvement of tumor visibility in the vicinity of gold fiducial markers. Radiology 2012; 263 (3) 696-705
  • 13 Lee YH, Park KK, Song HT, Kim S, Suh JS. Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software. Eur Radiol 2012; 22 (6) 1331-1340
  • 14 Huang JY, Kerns JR, Nute JL , et al. An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60 (3) 1047-1067
  • 15 Douglas-Akinwande AC, Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J, Rankin JL, Choplin RH. Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware . Radiographics 2006; 26 (Suppl. 01) S97-S110
  • 16 Wang Y, Qian B, Li B , et al. Metal artifacts reduction using monochromatic images from spectral CT: evaluation of pedicle screws in patients with scoliosis. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 (8) e360-e366
  • 17 Bamberg F, Dierks A, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Becker CR, Johnson TR. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol 2011; 21 (7) 1424-1429
  • 18 Li B, Yadava G, Hsieh J. Quantification of head and body CTDI(VOL) of dual-energy x-ray CT with fast-kVp switching. Med Phys 2011; 38 (5) 2595-2601
  • 19 Zhang D, Li X, Liu B. Objective characterization of GE discovery CT750 HD scanner: gemstone spectral imaging mode. Med Phys 2011; 38 (3) 1178-1188
  • 20 Yu L, Christner JA, Leng S, Wang J, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality. Med Phys 2011; 38 (12) 6371-6379