Download PDF
Der Klinikarzt 2015; 44(4): 190-195
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1552575
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Endosonografische Beurteilung von Pankreasneoplasien – Stellenwert von Elastografie, Kontrastmittel und Feinnadelpunktion

Endosonografic work-up of pancreatic neoplasms – Significance of elastography, contrast media and fine needle punction
Christoph Schlag
1   II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
,
Manuela Götzberger
2   Innere Medizin I, Klinikum Freising
,
Stefan von Delius
1   II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 April 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Solide und zystische Pankreasläsionen umfassen neben dem Pankreaskarzinom eine Vielzahl von Diagnosen und können im Einzelfall zu differenzialdiagnostischen Schwierigkeiten führen. Neben der Schnittbildgebung besitzt die Endosonografie (EUS) wegen ihrer hohen Ortsauflösung und der Möglichkeit zur Gewebsdiagnostik bei der Diagnostik von soliden und zystischen Pankreasläsionen einen hohen Stellenwert. Mit der Elastografie und der kontrastverstärkten Endosonografie sind in den letzten Jahren weitere Elemente zu einer umfassenden endosonografischen Diagnostik hinzugekommen.

Summary

Solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms include a variety of diagnoses and may lead to difficulties in differential diagnosis in particular cases. In addition to cross sectional imaging modalities endosonography contributes significantly to diagnostics for solid and cystic pancreatic lesions because of its enormous spatial resolution and the possibility for tissue sampling. In recent years elastography and contrast enhanced endosonography have become available for a complete endosonografic work-up of pancreatic lesions.

Key words

Endosonography - elastography - contrast media - fine needle punction - pancreas
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Cosgrove D, Piscagalla F, Bamber J et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 238-253
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dietrich CF, Janssen J. Spezielle bildgebende Verfahren: Farbdopplersonografie, CE-EUS, Elastografie, 3-D. et al. Jenssen C, Gottschalk U, Schachschal G, Dietrich CF. Kursbuch Endosonografie. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 2014
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Janssen J, Schlorer E, Greiner L. EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 971-978
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mei M, Ni J, Liu D, Jin P, Sun L. EUS elastography for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 77: 578-589
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Dietrich CF, Hirsche TO, Ott M, Ignee A. Real-time tissue elastography in the diagnosis of autoimmunpancreatitis. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 718-720
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Piscaglia F, Bolondi M. Italian Society for Ultrasound in and A. Biology Study Group on Ultrasound Contrast. The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1369-1375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 33-59
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gincul R, Palazzo M, Pujol B et al. Contrast-harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 373-379
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Seicean A, Badea R, Stan-Iuga R et al. Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for the discrimination of solid pancreatic masses. Ultraschall Med 2010; 31: 571-576
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 163-165
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yamashita Y, Ueda K, Itonaga M et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic sonography for discriminating mural nodules from mucous clots in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a single-center prospective study. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 61-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Rastogi A et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 86-92
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Affolter KE, Schmidt RL, Matynia AP et al. Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 1026-1034
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jenssen C, Faiss S, Nürnberg D. Complications of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided interventions – results of a survey among German centers. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 1177-1184
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Seufferlein T, Porzner M, Becker T et al. Guidelines Programme Oncology AWMF; German Cancer Society eV; German Cancer Aid. S3-guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 1395-1440
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Buxbaum JL, Eloubeidi MA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas 2013; 42: 20-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar