Download PDF
Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin 2015; 25(02): 101-107
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1398669
Wissenschaft und Forschung
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Kinästhesie der Kraft und Bewegung und die taktile Diskrimination bei Patienten mit einer leichten Form des Karpaltunnelsyndroms

Kinesthesia of Force and Motion and the Tactile Discrimination in Patients with a Mild Form of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
T. Wolny
1   Lehrstuhl für Kinesiotherapie und spezielle Methoden der Physiotherapie, Akademie für Körpererziehung, Kattowitz OS, Polen
2   Wirtschaftshochschule, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Polen
,
E. Saulicz
1   Lehrstuhl für Kinesiotherapie und spezielle Methoden der Physiotherapie, Akademie für Körpererziehung, Kattowitz OS, Polen
2   Wirtschaftshochschule, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Polen
,
P. Linek
1   Lehrstuhl für Kinesiotherapie und spezielle Methoden der Physiotherapie, Akademie für Körpererziehung, Kattowitz OS, Polen
,
A. Myśliwiec
1   Lehrstuhl für Kinesiotherapie und spezielle Methoden der Physiotherapie, Akademie für Körpererziehung, Kattowitz OS, Polen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 29 August 2014

angenommen: 19 January 2015

Publication Date:
08 April 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung: Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom (KTS) charakterisiert sich sowohl durch sensorische und motorische Störungen als auch durch Muskelschwund im fortgeschrittenen Stadium. Aus diesem Grund nutzen viele Autoren die Untersuchung der Sensibilität, der Greifkraft und des Bewegungsumfangs, um den klinischen Zustand und die Therapieergebnisse zu beurteilen.

Ziel: Das Ziel der Untersuchung war die Beurteilung des Verhaltens der Muskelkraft und deren kinästhetischen Differenzierungsfähigkeit, der Beweglichkeit und deren kinästhetischen Differenzierungsfähigkeit sowie der 2-punkt-Diskrimination bei Personen im leichten Stadium des KTS.

Material und Methoden: An der Untersuchung nahmen insgesamt 32 Personen teil: 16 gesunde Personen und 16 Personen mit KTS. Alle Untersuchten waren Rechtshänder. Das KTS trat in der dominierenden rechten Hand auf. Beurteilt wurden die Muskelkraft, die kinästhetische Differenzierungsfähigkeit der Kraft, der Bewegungsumfang im Radiokarpalgelenk, die kinästhetische Differenzierungsfähigkeit der Bewegung und die 2-punkt-Diskrimination.

Ergebnisse: Bei der Beurteilung der Kraft und der kinästhetischen Differenzierungsfähigkeit der Kraft in den beiden untersuchten Gruppen wurde ein signifikanter Unterschied in Bezug auf die prozentualen Werte der kinästhetischen Differenzierungsfähigkeit der Kraft des Daumens beobachtet (p=0,01). In sonstigen Fällen wurden keine signifikanten Unterschiede festgestellt. Lediglich unterschied sich in der Beurteilung der Beweglichkeit der Bewegungsumfang der Beugung in der Gruppe mit KTS wesentlich von der Kontrollgruppe (p=0,03). In der Beurteilung der 2-punkt-Diskrimination zeigten die Ergebnisse einen wesentlich kleineren Wert der taktilen Diskrimination aller untersuchten Finger in der Gruppe mit KTS im Vergleich zu der gesunden Gruppe (p<0,001).

Schlussfolgerungen: Es sind wesentliche Unterschiede in der Beurteilung der kinästhetischen Sensibilität des Zangengriffs, des Bewegungsumfangs der Beugung und der 2-punkt-Diskrimination aufgetreten. Schon in der frühen Phase des KTS tritt erhebliches Defizit der Diskriminationsempfindung im Vergleich zu der Population der gesunden Menschen auf.

Abstract

Introduction: The carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is characterised by both sensory and motor disorders as well as muscular atrophy in more advanced stages. For that reason a lot of authors examine the sensation, grip strength and range of motion to assess the clinical condition and the results of a therapy.

Aim: The aim of this study was the assessment of the muscle strength and its kinesthetic differentiation, range of motion and its kinesthetic differentiation as well as 2-point discrimination in people with a mild stage of CTS.

Material and methods: 32 people in total took part in the research: 16 healthy people and 16 people with CTS. All of the participants were right-handed. The CTS occurred in the dominant right extremity. Muscle strength, kinesthetic differentiation of strength, range of motion in the radiocarpal articulation as well as the kinesthetic differentiation of movement and 2-point discrimination were subjected to assessment.

Results: The assessment of strength and kinesthetic differentiation of strength between the studied groups showed significant difference regarding the percentage value of the kinesthetic differentiation of thumb strength (p=0.01). No significant differences were found in the remaining instances. In the assessment of the range of motion, only the flexion motion differed significantly between the group with CTS and the control group (p=0.03). Results of assessment of 2-point discrimination show significantly lower value of tactile discrimination of all the examined fingers in CTS group in relation to the healthy people group (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Significant differences occurred in the assessment of kinesthetic sensation of pincer grip, flexion range of motion and 2-point tactile discrimination. Two-point discrimination may be a useful diagnostic tool even in mild forms of CTS.

Schlüsselwörter

Muskelkraft - Bewegungsumfang - kinästhetischen Differenzierungsfähigkeit - diskriminierende Empfindung

Key words

muscle strength - range of motion - kinesthetic differentation - discrimination sense
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Akalin E, El O, Peker O et al. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with nerve and tendon gliding exercises. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 108-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Andersson GBJ, Cocchiarella L. American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairments. 5th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Assmus H, Antoniadis G, Bischoff Ch. Karpaltunnel-, Kubitaltunnel- und seltene Nervenkompressionssyndrome. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112: 14-26 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0014.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bardak AN, Alp M, Erhan B et al. Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Conservative Treatment in the Management of Carpal Tunnel. Adv Ther 2009; 26: 107-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Braun RM, Jackson WJ. Electrical studies as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19: 893-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Carlson H, Colbert A, Frydl J et al. Current options for nonsurgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Clin Rheumtol 2010; 5: 129-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chang MH, Chiang HT, Ger LP et al. The cause of slowed forearm median conduction velocity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111: 1039-1044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chang WD, Wu JH, Jiang JA et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome treated with a diode laser: a controlled treatment of the transverse carpal ligament. Photomed Laser Surg 2008; 26: 551-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Corwin HM, Kasdan ML. Electrodiagnostic reports of median neuropathy at the wrist. J Hand Surg Am 1998; 23: 55-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Crosby PM, Dellon AL. Comparison of two-point discrimination testing devices. Micro Surg 1989; 10: 134-137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE, Crosby PM. Reliability of two-point discrimination testing. J Hand Surg 1987; 12A: 693-696
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts M. Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2nd Edition Hanley & Belfus; Philadelphia: 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Elfar JC, Yaseen Z, Stern PJ et al. Individual finger sensibility in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 1807-1812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Eryilmaz M, Koçer A, Kocaman G et al. Two-point discrimination in diabetic patients. J Diabetes 2013; 5: 442-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Finsen V, Russwurm H. Neurophysiology not required before surgery for typical carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 2001; 26: 61-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Franco PG, Bohrer RC, Rodacki AL. Intra-observer reproducibility of the feet soles two-point discrimination test in asymptomatic elderly and young individuals. Rev Bras Fisioter 2012; 16: 523-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Giannini F, Cioni R, Mondelli M et al. A new clinical scale of carpal tunnel syndrome: validation of the measurement and clinical-neurophysiological assessment. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113: 71-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Haig AJ, Tzeng HM, LeBreck DB. The value of electrodiagnostic consultation for patients with upper extremity nerve complaints: a prospective comparison with the history and physical examination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1273-1281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM et al. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 1999; 83: 157-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle. Principles and Practice. F.A.Davis Co; Philadelphia: 1989
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Kohara N. Clinical and electrophysiological findings in carpal tunnel syndrome. Brain Nerve 2007; 59: 1229-1238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Eliasson AC. Comparing tests of tactile sensibility: aspects relevant to testing children with spastic hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44: 604-612
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kuntzer T. Carpal tunnel syndrome in 100 patients: sensitivity, specificity of multi-neurophysiological procedures and estimation of axonal loss of motor, sensory and sympathetic median nerve fibers. J Neurol Sci 1994; 127: 221-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1585-1592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lundborg G, Gelberman RH, Minteer-Convery M et al. Median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel – functional response to experimentally induced controlled pressure. J Hand Surg Am 1982; 7: 252-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Meek MF, Coert JH. Recovery of two-point discrimination function after digital nerve repair in the hand using resorbable FDA- and CE-approved nerve conduits. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1307-1315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology 2002; 58: 289-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nora DB, Becker J, Ehlers JA et al. What symptoms are truly caused by median nerve compression in carpal tunnel syndrome?. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116: 275-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nowak M, Noszczyk B. Simple clinical tests in severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Pol Przegl Chir 2012; 84: 502-508
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 O’Sullivan S. Physical Rehabilitation. Fifth Edition . Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 136-146. 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Padua L, Lo Monaco M, Valente EM et al. A useful electrophysiologic parameter for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1996; 19: 48-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Premoselli S, Sioli P, Grossi A et al. Neutral wrist splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome: a 3- and 6-months clinical and neurophysiologic follow-up evaluation of night-only splint therapy. Eura Medicophys 2006; 42: 121-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Rankin EA. Carpal tunnel syndrome: issues and answers. J Natl Med Assoc 1995; 87: 369-371
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC et al. Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1447-1451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Robinson LR. Electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2007; 18: 733-746
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Shooter D. Use of two-point discrimination as a nerve repair assessment tool: preliminary report. ANZ J Surg 2005; 75: 866-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Silva PG, Jones A, Araujo PM et al. Assessment of light touch sensation in the hands of systemic sclerosis patients. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2014; 69: 585-588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sulewski A, Nawrot P, Nowakowski A. Ważne aspekty kliniczne w leczeniu i rozpoznawaniu zespołu kanału nadgarstka u osób starszych. Geriatria 2009; : 147-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Szabo RM, Slater Jr RR, Farver TB et al. The value of diagnostic testing in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1999; 24: 704-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Tal-Akabi A, Rushton A. An investigation to compare the effectiveness of carpal bone mobilisation and neurodynamic mobilisation as methods of treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Man Ther 2000; 5: 214-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Watanabe T, Owashi K, Kanauchi Y et al. The short-term reliability of grip strength measurement and the effects of posture and grip span. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30: 603-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar