Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391230
Computed tomographic enterography adds value to colonoscopy in differentiating Crohn’s disease from intestinal tuberculosis: a potential diagnostic algorithm
Publication History
submitted02 April 2014
accepted after revision27 October 2014
Publication Date:
12 February 2015 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoscopy/201504/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0034-1391230-1.jpg)
Background: Crohn’s disease and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) are chronic granulomatous disorders that are difficult to distinguish. Computed tomographic enterography (CTE) yields striking findings for Crohn’s disease in the small bowel but its role in differentiating Crohn’s from ITB is undefined. This prospective study aimed to investigate the value of CTE for differential diagnosis between Crohn’s disease and ITB.
Patients and methods: 105 consecutive patients (67 Crohn’s, 38 ITB) who underwent CTE and colonoscopy were enrolled. CTE findings and colonoscopic parameters were compared between Crohn’s disease and ITB by blinded reviewers. Based on univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses, a diagnostic algorithm combining colonoscopy and CTE was formulated. and its performance validated on 60 new patients (40 Crohn’s, 20 ITB).
Results: On univariate analysis of CTE findings, proximal small-bowel involvement, asymmetrical mural thickening, segmental small-bowel lesions, mural stratification, the comb sign, and mesentery fibrofatty proliferation were significantly more common in Crohn’s disease, whereas mesenteric lymph node change (calcification or central necrosis) and focal ileocecal lesions were more common in ITB. On multivariate analysis, segmental small-bowel involvement (odds ratio [OR] 0.104, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 0.022 – 0.50), and comb sign (OR 0.02, 95 %CI 0.003 – 0.26) were independent predictors of Crohn’s. Combining CTE and colonoscopic findings increased the accuracy of diagnosing either Crohn’s disease or ITB from 66.7 % (70/105) to 95.2 % (100/105) in the development set (P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) in the validation dataset were 92.5 %, 80 %, and 0.862 (95 %CI 0.75 – 0.98), respectively.
Conclusions: CTE adds unique information to colonoscopy in differential diagnosis between Crohn’s disease and ITB, allowing correct diagnosis in most patients.
* These two authors contributed equally to this work.
-
References
- 1 Almadi MA, Ghosh S, Aljebreen AM. Differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn’s disease: a diagnostic challenge. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 1003-1012
- 2 Cosnes J, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P et al. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1785-1794
- 3 Thia KT, Loftus Jr EV, Sandborn WJ et al. An update on the epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Asia. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 3167-3182
- 4 Wang T, Xue F, Chen Y et al. The spatial epidemiology of tuberculosis in Linyi City, China, 2005 – 2010. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 885
- 5 Yang SK, Yun S, Kim JH et al. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in the Songpa-Kangdong district, Seoul, Korea, 1986 – 2005: a KASID study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2008; 14: 542-549
- 6 Makharia GK, Srivastava S, Das P et al. Clinical, endoscopic, and histological differentiations between Crohn's disease and intestinal tuberculosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 642-651
- 7 Lee YJ, Yang SK, Myung SJ et al. The usefulness of colonoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis and pattern of concomitant extra-intestinal tuberculosis. Korean J Gastroenterol 2004; 44: 153-159
- 8 Pulimood AB, Peter S, Ramakrishna B et al. Segmental colonoscopic biopsies in the differentiation of ileocolic tuberculosis from Crohn’s disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 20: 688-696
- 9 Makharia GK, Sachdev V, Gupta R et al. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody does not differentiate between Crohn’s disease and intestinal tuberculosis. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52: 33-39
- 10 Naga MI, Okasha HH, Ismail Z et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of colonic tuberculosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 789-793
- 11 Wong SS, Chow E. Endoscopic diagnosis of colonic tuberculosis: unusual presentation with two colonic strictures. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 783
- 12 He Y, Chen YJ, Yang H et al. Clinical and colonoscopic characteristics of Crohn disease and intestinal tuberculosis. Chinese J Dig Endosc 2012; 29: 48-52
- 13 Lee YJ, Yang SK, Byeon JS et al. Analysis of colonoscopic findings in the differential diagnosis between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn’s disease. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 592-597
- 14 Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Solem CA et al. Crohn disease: mural attenuation and thickness at contrast-enhanced CT enterography – correlation with endoscopic and histologic findings of inflammation. Radiology 2006; 238: 505-516
- 15 Colombel JF, Solem CA, Sandborn WJ et al. Quantitative measurement and visual assessment of ileal Crohn's disease activity by computed tomography enterography: correlation with endoscopic severity and C reactive protein. Gut 2006; 55: 1561-1567
- 16 Mao RGao X, Zhu ZH et al. CT enterography in evaluating postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection: complementary role to endoscopy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 977-982
- 17 Park YH, Chuang WS, Park SJ et al. Diagnostic role of CT enterography in differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn’s disease. Gut 2011; 60: A190
- 18 Kedia S, Birender N, Mouli P et al. CT based predictive model for differentiation of Crohn’s disease from intestinal tuberculosis. Asian IBD Symposium 2012; OP-10
- 19 Park YH, Chung WS, Lim JS et al. Diagnostic role of computed tomographic enterography differentiating crohn disease from intestinal tuberculosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013; 37: 834-839
- 20 Loftus Jr EV, Silverstein MD, Sandborn WJ et al. Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1940 – 1993: incidence, prevalence, and survival. Gastroenterology 1998; 1998: 1161-1168
- 21 Epstein D, Watermeyer G, Kirsch R. Review article: the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease in populations with high-risk rates for tuberculosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25: 1373-1388
- 22 Gao X, He Y, Chen YJ et al. Clinical and endoscopic evaluation of anti-tuberculosis trial for differentiation between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn’s disease. Chin J Dig Endosc 2011; 28: 446-451
- 23 Pulimood AB, Amarapurkar DN, Ghoshal U et al. Differentiation of Crohn’s disease from intestinal tuberculosis in India in 2010. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 433-443
- 24 Higgins PD, Caoili E, Zimmermann M et al. Computed tomographic enterography adds information to clinical management in small bowel Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007; 13: 262-268
- 25 Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG et al. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 2006; 26: 641-657
- 26 Soyer P, Boudiaf M, Sirol M et al. Suspected anastomotic recurrence of Crohn disease after ileocolic resection: evaluation with CT enteroclysis. Radiology 2010; 254: 755-764
- 27 Bhargava DK, Tandon HD, Chawla TC et al. Diagnosis of ileocecal and colonic tuberculosis by colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1985; 31: 68-70
- 28 Li Y, Zhang LF, Liu XQ et al. The role of in vitro interferon-gamma-release assay in differentiating intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn’s disease in China. J Crohns Colitis 2012; 6: 317-323
- 29 Pulimood AB, Ramakrishna BS, Kurian G et al. Endoscopic mucosal biopsies are useful in distinguishing granulomatous colitis due to Crohn’s disease from tuberculosis. Gut 1999; 45: 537-541
- 30 Alvares JF, Devarbhavi H, Makhija P et al. Clinical, colonoscopic, and histological profile of colonic tuberculosis in a tertiary hospital. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 351-356