Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28(4): 207-212
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390174
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Orthodontic Considerations for Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Using Internal Distractors

Adriana da Silveira
1   Department of Orthodontics, Dell Children's Craniofacial & Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Center, Austin, Texas
,
Pollyana Marques de Moura
2   Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas
,
Raymond J. Harshbarger III
3   Department of Craniofacial & Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Dell Children's Medical Center, University Medical Center Brackenridge, Austin, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 November 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The orthodontist plays a key role in the selection of the optimal treatment for patients followed by a craniofacial team. For patients with cleft lip and palate, the need for multidisciplinary treatment planning and sequentially staged treatment is essential for successful patient outcomes. The technique of Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla using an internal device is potentially a predictable, stable, and convenient option for the correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia. It is an alternative option for treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in growing patients. In this article, the authors describe the orthodontist's approach to the management of cleft patients with severe maxillary deficiency with the use of an internal distraction device. The information is presented with a focus on the clinical aspects of treatment, using case illustrations and appropriate literature.

Keywords

internal Le Fort I distractor - maxillary distraction - distraction osteogenesis - maxillary hypoplasia - cleft lip and palate
 

  • References

  • 1 Lisson JA, Weyrich C. Extent of maxillary deficiency in patients with complete UCLP and BCLP. Head Face Med 2014; 10 (1) 26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Capelozza Filho L, Normando AD, da Silva Filho OG. Isolated influences of lip and palate surgery on facial growth: comparison of operated and unoperated male adults with UCLP. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996; 33 (1) 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Saltaji H, Major MP, Altalibi M, Youssef M, Flores-Mir C. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients. Angle Orthod 2012; 82 (6) 1115-1122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Scolozzi P. Distraction osteogenesis in the management of severe maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate patients. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (5) 1199-1214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Friede H, Ko EW. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (6) 1382-1392 , discussion 1393–1394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Erverdi N, Küçükkeleş N, Şener C, Selamet BU. Interdental distraction osteogenesis for the management of alveolar clefts: archwise distraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41 (1) 37-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Liou EJW, Chen PKT. Intraoral distraction of segmental osteotomies and miniscrews in management of alveolar cleft. Semin Orthod 2009; 15: 257-267
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Yamaji KE, Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF. New internal Le Fort I distractor for the treatment of midface hypoplasia. J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15 (1) 124-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Guerrero CA, Bell WH, Meza LS. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis: maxillary and mandibular lengthening. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1999; 7 (1) 111-151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cheung LK, Chua HD. A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35 (1) 14-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rachmiel A, Aizenbud D, Eleftheriou S, Peled M, Laufer D. Extraoral vs. intraoral distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 45 (4) 386-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Varela M, García-Camba JE. Impact of orthodontics on the psychologic profile of adult patients: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108 (2) 142-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Frejman MW, Vargas IA, Rösing CK, Closs LQ. Dentofacial deformities are associated with lower degrees of self-esteem and higher impact on oral health-related quality of life: results from an observational study involving adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71 (4) 763-767
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Deguchi T, Kuroda T, Minoshima Y, Graber TM. Craniofacial features of patients with Class III abnormalities: growth-related changes and effects of short-term and long-term chincup therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121 (1) 84-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117 (6) 669-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Mandibular skeletal changes induced by early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion: a superimposition study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108 (5) 525-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Battagel JM. Predictors of relapse in orthodontically-treated Class III malocclusions. Br J Orthod 1994; 21 (1) 1-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Franchi L, Baccetti T, Tollaro I. Predictive variables for the outcome of early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112 (1) 80-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Moon YM, Ahn SJ, Chang YI. Cephalometric predictors of long-term stability in the early treatment of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2005; 75 (5) 747-753
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Tahmina K, Tanaka E, Tanne K. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117 (6) 681-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Doucet JC, Herlin C, Bigorre M, Bäumler C, Subsol G, Captier G. Mandibular effects of maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43 (6) 702-707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Harada K, Sato M, Omura K. Long-term maxillomandibular skeletal and dental changes in children with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102 (3) 292-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wenghoefer M, Martini M, Nadjmi N, Schutyser F, Jagtman AK, Bergé S. Trans-sinusoidal maxillary distraction in three cleft patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35 (10) 954-960
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Apaydin A, Yazdirduyev B, Can T, Keklikoglu N. Soft tissue changes during distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 40 (4) 408-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wang XX, Wang X, Yi B, Li ZL, Liang C, Lin Y. Internal midface distraction in correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (1) 51-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Liou EJW, Chen PH, Wang YC, Yu CC, Huang CS, Chen YR. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: postoperative rapid orthodontic tooth movement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69 (3) 781-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Verna C, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The rate and the type of orthodontic tooth movement is influenced by bone turnover in a rat model. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22 (4) 343-352
    Google Scholar