Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2013; 26(04): 244-249
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1356725
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Effective Teaching and Feedback Strategies in the OR and Beyond

Bradley J. Champagne
1   Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Case Medical Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 November 2013 (online)

Abstract

Maintaining a standard of excellence for graduating surgical residents requires a comprehensive and consistent approach to surgical education. The omnipresent and increasing barriers to education must also be recognized and addressed. The implementation of effective teaching strategies is largely dependent on the resources available at each institution and the vision of education. Unfortunately, allocating time for surgeons to teach both inside and outside the operating room has become a foreign concept to administration. Furthermore, the reduction in case numbers performed by trainees now demands “quality over quantity” to ensure success. Quality teaching moments will only be realized when emphasis is placed on preparation, useful instruction during the procedure, and postoperative feedback. Ideal preparation entails a detailed discussion between the trainee and surgeon about the specific learning goals for the case. During the procedure, the faculty surgeon must strive to maximize the experience through effective communication while performing an efficient and safe operation. Numerous validated objective assessment tools exist for postprocedure evaluation but are grossly underutilized. Surgical education must thoughtfully be approached with the same fervor and detail as patient care. As faculty, it is our responsibility to train the next generation of surgeons and therefore “every case must count.”

 
  • References

  • 1 Raval MV, Wang X, Cohen ME , et al. The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212 (5) 889-898
  • 2 Babineau TJ, Becker J, Gibbons G , et al. The “cost” of operative training for surgical residents. Arch Surg 2004; 139 (4) 366-369 , discussion 369–370
  • 3 Davis Jr SS, Husain FA, Lin E, Nandipati KC, Perez S, Sweeney JF. Resident participation in index laparoscopic general surgical cases: impact of the learning environment on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216 (1) 96-104
  • 4 Iannuzzi JC, Rickles AS, Deeb AP, Sharma A, Fleming FJ, Monson JR. Outcomes associated with resident involvement in partial colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (2) 212-218
  • 5 Shin S, Britt R, Doviak M, Britt LD. The impact of the 80-hour work week on appropriate resident case coverage. J Surg Res 2010; 162 (1) 33-36
  • 6 Froelich J, Milbrandt JC, Allan DG. Impact of the 80-hour workweek on surgical exposure and national in-training examination scores in an orthopedic residency program. J Surg Educ 2009; 66 (2) 85-88
  • 7 Jagannathan J, Vates GE, Pouratian N , et al. Impact of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hour regulations on neurosurgical resident education and productivity. J Neurosurg 2009; 110 (5) 820-827
  • 8 Jagsi R, Weinstein DF, Shapiro J, Kitch BT, Dorer D, Weissman JS. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's limits on residents' work hours and patient safety. A study of resident experiences and perceptions before and after hours reductions. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168 (5) 493-500
  • 9 Tran J, Lewis R, de Virgilio C. The effect of the 80-hour work week on general surgery resident operative case volume. Am Surg 2006; 72 (10) 924-928
  • 10 John CM. Twenty One Irrefutable Laws on Leadership. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers; 2005: 99-106
  • 11 Pugh CM, DaRosa DA, Santacaterina S, Clark RE. Faculty evaluation of simulation-based modules for assessment of intraoperative decision making. Surgery 2011; 149 (4) 534-542
  • 12 Korndorffer Jr JR, Stefanidis D, Scott DJ. Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards. Am J Surg 2006; 191 (1) 17-22
  • 13 Kim MJ, Boehler ML, Ketchum JK, Bueno Jr R, Williams RG, Dunnington GL. Skills coaches as part of the educational team: a randomized controlled trial of teaching of a basic surgical skill in the laboratory setting. Am J Surg 2010; 199 (1) 94-98
  • 14 Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Development and validation of a comprehensive curriculum to teach an advanced minimally invasive procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (1) 25-32
  • 15 Calatayud D, Arora S, Aggarwal R , et al. Warm-up in a virtual reality environment improves performance in the operating room. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (6) 1181-1185
  • 16 Roberts NK, Williams RG, Kim MJ, Dunnington GL. The briefing, intraoperative teaching, debriefing model for teaching in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208 (2) 299-303
  • 17 Snyder RA, Tarpley MJ, Tarpley JL, Davidson M, Brophy C, Dattilo JB. Teaching in the operating room: results of a national survey. J Surg Educ 2012; 69 (5) 643-649
  • 18 De Grave WS, Dolmans DH, van der Vleuten CP. Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: scaffolding student learning. Med Educ 1999; 33 (12) 901-906
  • 19 Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB. Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2010; 252 (6) 943-951
  • 20 Garrett KA, Champagne BJ, Valerian BT, Peterson D, Lee EC. A single training center's experience with 200 consecutive cases of diverticulitis: can all patients be approached laparoscopically?. Surg Endosc 2008; 22 (11) 2503-2508
  • 21 Carter BN. The fruition of Halsted's concept of surgical training. Surgery 1952; 32 (3) 518-527
  • 22 Roberts NK, Brenner MJ, Williams RG, Kim MJ, Dunnington GL. Capturing the teachable moment: a grounded theory study of verbal teaching interactions in the operating room. Surgery 2012; 151 (5) 643-650
  • 23 Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15 (11) 988-994
  • 24 Ko CY, Escarce JJ, Baker L, Sharp J, Guarino C. Predictors of surgery resident satisfaction with teaching by attendings: a national survey. Ann Surg 2005; 241 (2) 373-380
  • 25 Chen XP, Williams RG, Sanfey HA, Dunnington GL. How do supervising surgeons evaluate guidance provided in the operating room?. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (1) 44-48
  • 26 Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R , et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997; 84 (2) 273-278
  • 27 Palter VN, MacRae HM, Grantcharov TP. Development of an objective evaluation tool to assess technical skill in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi methodology. Am J Surg 2011; 201 (2) 251-259
  • 28 Sidhu RS, Vikis E, Cheifetz R, Phang T. Self-assessment during a 2-day laparoscopic colectomy course: can surgeons judge how well they are learning new skills?. Am J Surg 2006; 191 (5) 677-681
  • 29 Sanfey HA, Dunnington GL. Basic surgical skills testing for junior residents: current views of general surgery program directors. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212 (3) 406-412
  • 30 Kim MJ, Williams RG, Boehler ML, Ketchum JK, Dunnington GL. Refining the evaluation of operating room performance. J Surg Educ 2009; 66 (6) 352-356
  • 31 Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Carter F, Coleman MG, Hanna GB. Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (4) 1136-1142
  • 32 Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Parvaiz A, Hanna GB. Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level. Surg Endosc 2012; 26 (3) 796-803