Zentralbl Chir 2014; 139(3): 292-300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328181
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Entwicklung der Pankreaschirurgie in den letzten 10 Jahren

Developments in Pancreatic Surgery During the Past Ten Years
T. Hackert
Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszerale und Transplantationschirurgie, Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
,
C. Tjaden
Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszerale und Transplantationschirurgie, Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
,
M. W. Büchler
Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszerale und Transplantationschirurgie, Universität Heidelberg, Deutschland
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
03. Juli 2013 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die Pankreaschirurgie hat sich in den vergangenen Jahren in großem Umfang weiterentwickelt. Spezialisierte Zentrumsbildung mit interdisziplinärer Expertise hat zu einer Verbesserung der Patientenbetreuung und Senkung der perioperativen Morbidität und Mortalität geführt. Im Hinblick auf die evidenzbasierte Medizin wurden internationale Konsensusdefinitionen zur Morbidität und qualitativ hochwertige Studien, systematische Review-Arbeiten sowie Metaanalysen zu vielen Aspekten der Pankreaschirurgie publiziert. Bei akuter Pankreatitis hat sich ein Paradigmenwechsel vom operativen zum konservativen Vorgehen vollzogen, bei der chronischen Pankreatitis haben die parenchymsparenden Resektionsverfahren eine weite Verbreitung gefunden. Das Management zystischer Pankreasveränderungen – insbesondere der intraduktal papillär-muzinösen Neoplasien (IPMN) – nimmt einen großen Stellenwert in der chirurgischen Praxis ein. Beim Pankreaskarzinom haben – über die chirurgisch-technischen Aspekte hinaus – große internationale Multicenterstudien die herausragende Bedeutung der adjuvanten Therapie gezeigt.

Abstract

Pancreatic surgery has undergone significant progress during recent years. Specialised centres with interdisciplinary expertise have led to improved patient care with decreased morbidity and mortality. Regarding evidence-based medicine, consensus definitions on morbidity as well as high-quality studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses on different topics of pancreatic surgery have been published. In acute pancreatitis paradigms have shifted towards conservative management, in chronic pancreatitis parenchyma-sparing resection techniques have widely become accepted. Management of cystic lesions – especially intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) – has attracted great interest in surgical practice. In pancreatic cancer treatment not only surgical resection techniques have improved but also the central impact of adjuvant treatment has been demonstrated in large multicentre trials.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 UK Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 2005; 54: 256-276
  • 2 van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ et al. Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1491-1502
  • 3 Werner J, Feuerbach S, Uhl W et al. Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 2005; 54: 426-436
  • 4 Izbicki JR, Bloechle C, Knoefel WT et al. Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 350-358
  • 5 Farkas G, Leindler L, Daroczi M et al. Prospective randomised comparison of organ-preserving pancreatic head resection with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2006; 391: 338-342
  • 6 Strobel O, Büchler MW, Werner J. Surgical therapy of chronic pancreatitis: indications, techniques and results. Int J Surg 2009; 7: 305-312
  • 7 Beger HG, Buchler M, Bittner RR et al. Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in severe chronic pancreatitis. Early and late results. Ann Surg 1989; 209: 273-278
  • 8 DʼAngelica M, Brennan MF, Suriawinata AA et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an analysis of clinicopathologic features and outcome. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 400-408
  • 9 Schmidt CM, White PB, Waters JA et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: predictors of malignant and invasive pathology. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 644-651
  • 10 Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD et al. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358: 1576-1585
  • 11 Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF et al. European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs. observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 308: 147-156
  • 12 Parekh D. Laparoscopic-assisted pancreatic necrosectomy: A new surgical option for treatment of severe necrotizing pancreatitis. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 895-902
  • 13 Wronski M, Cebulski W, Slodkowski M et al. Retroperitoneal minimally invasive pancreatic necrosectomy using single-port access. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012; 22: e8-e11
  • 14 Beger HG, Buchler M, Bittner R et al. Necrosectomy and postoperative local lavage in necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 207-212
  • 15 Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Makary MA et al. Debridement and closed packing for the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 676-684
  • 16 Lerch MM, Stier A, Wahnschaffe U et al. Pancreatic pseudocysts: observation, endoscopic drainage, or resection?. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106: 614-621
  • 17 van Baal MC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ et al. Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 860-866
  • 18 Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Nio Y et al. Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 676-684
  • 19 Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Laramée P et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic vs. surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1690-1695
  • 20 Bachmann K, Izbicki JR, Yekebas EF. Chronic pancreatitis: modern surgical management. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396: 139-149
  • 21 Gloor B, Friess H, Uhl W et al. A modified technique of the Beger and Frey procedure in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Dig Surg 2001; 18: 21-25
  • 22 Diener MK, Rahbari NN, Fischer L et al. Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 950-961
  • 23 Diener MK, Bruckner T, Contin P et al. ChroPac-trial: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Trial protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Trials 2010; 11: 47
  • 24 Seelig MH, Chromik AM, Weyhe D et al. Pancreatic redo procedures: to do or not to do – this is the question. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 1175-1182
  • 25 Cataldegirmen G, Bogoevski D, Mann O et al. Late morbidity after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection with bile duct reinsertion into the resection cavity. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 447-452
  • 26 Morgan KA, Fontenot BB, Harvey NR et al. Revision of anastomotic stenosis after pancreatic head resection for chronic pancreatitis: is it futile?. HPB (Oxford) 2010; 12: 211-216
  • 27 Hackert T, Tjaden C, Lutz S et al. Redo-operations in chronic pancreatitis: indications, procedures and outcome. Pancreas 2011; 40: 1324
  • 28 Kloppel G. Clinicopathologic view of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45: 1981-1985
  • 29 Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V et al. International Association of Pancreatology. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2006; 6: 17-32
  • 30 Fritz S, Klauss M, Bergmann F et al. Small (Sendai negative) branch-duct IPMNs: not harmless. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 313-320
  • 31 Hackert T, Hinz U, Fritz S et al. Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396: 1197-1203
  • 32 Diener MK, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G et al. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (11) CD006053
  • 33 Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 508-517
  • 34 Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 613-622
  • 35 Adler G, Seufferlein T, Bischoff SC et al. S3-Leitlinie „Exokrines Pankreaskarzinom“ 2007. Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45: 487-523
  • 36 Weitz J, Kienle P, Schmidt J et al. Portal vein resection for advanced pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 712-716
  • 37 Siriwardana HP, Siriwardena AK. Systematic review of outcome of synchronous portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 662-673
  • 38 Bockhorn M, Burdelski C, Bogoevski D. Arterial en bloc resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 86-92
  • 39 Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M et al. Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 882-893
  • 40 Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U et al. Multivisceral resection for pancreatic malignancies: risk-analysis and long-term outcome. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 81-87
  • 41 Roeder F, Timke C, Uhl M et al. Aggressive local treatment containing intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for patients with isolated local recurrences of pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis. BMC Cancer 2012; 12: 295
  • 42 Grenacher L, Klauss M. Computertomographie bei Pankreastumoren. Radiologe 2009; 49: 107-123
  • 43 Weitz J, Rahbari N, Koch M et al. The „artery first“ approach for resection of pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 201: e1-e4
  • 44 Hackert T, Werner J, Weitz J et al. Uncinate process first–a novel approach for pancreatic head resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395: 1161-1164
  • 45 Müller MW, Friess H, Kleeff J et al. Is there still a role for total pancreatectomy?. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 966-974
  • 46 Jamil LH, Chindris AM, Gill KR et al. Glycemic control after total pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: an exploratory study. HPB Surg 2012; 2012: 381328
  • 47 Crippa S, Partelli S, Falconi M. Extent of surgical resections for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. World J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 2: 347-351
  • 48 Nara S, Oguro S, Hata S et al. Total pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for a pancreatic adenocarcinoma involving both the gastroduodenal artery and the celiac artery. Hepatogastroenterology 2012; 59: 1635-1637
  • 49 Seelig MH, Belyaev O, Uhl W. Reconstruction of the common hepatic artery at the time of total pancreatectomy using a splenohepatic bypass. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 913-915
  • 50 Hackert T, Büchler MW. Remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy: current state and future perspectives. Surgeon 2012; 10: 95-101
  • 51 Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I et al. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1514-1522
  • 52 Sheehan MK, Beck K, Creech S et al. Distal pancreatectomy: does the method of closure influence fistula formation?. Am Surg 2002; 68: 264-267
  • 53 Glowka TR, Webler M, Hirner A et al. Revisionseingriffe und Interventionen nach Pankreaslinksresektion. Zentralbl Chir 2010; 135: 139-142
  • 54 Gumbs AA, Rodriguez Rivera AM, Milone L et al. Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a review of 285 published cases. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1335-1341
  • 55 Song KB, Kim SC, Park JB et al. Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3364-3372
  • 56 Siech M, Bartsch D, Beger HG et al. Indikation zur laparoskopischen Pankreasoperation: Ergebnisse einer Konsensuskonferenz und des bisherigen laparoskopischen Pankreasregisters. Chirurg 2012; 83: 247-253
  • 57 Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al. International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13
  • 58 Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007; 142: 761-768
  • 59 Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007; 142: 20-25
  • 60 Sülberg D, Chromik AM, Köster O et al. Prävention und Management von postoperativen Komplikationen in der Pankreaschirurgie. Zentralbl Chir 2010; 135: 129-138
  • 61 Stampfl U, Hackert T, Sommer CM et al. Superselective embolization for the management of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: a single-center experience in 25 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012; 23: 504-510
  • 62 Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 1310-1314
  • 63 Welsch T, Borm M, Degrate L et al. Evaluation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy in a high-volume centre. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1043-1050
  • 64 Tani M, Terasawa H, Kawai M et al. Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 316-320
  • 65 Kawai M, Tani M, Hirono S et al. Pylorus ring resection reduces delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of pylorus-resecting versus pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 495-501
  • 66 Keck T. Pankreaskarzinom: Aktueller Stand der multimodalen Therapie. Zentralbl Chir 2011; 136: 352-358
  • 67 Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde C et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000267
  • 68 Morganti AG, Massaccesi M, La Torre G et al. A systematic review of resectability and survival after concurrent chemoradiation in primarily unresectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 194-205
  • 69 Zhu CP, Shi J, Chen YX et al. Gemcitabine in the chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2011; 99: 108-113
  • 70 Habermehl D, Kessel K, Welzel T et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with Gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Radiat Oncol 2012; 7: 28
  • 71 Combs SE, Habermehl D, Werner J et al. Strategien für präoperatives Downsizing bei inoperablem Pankreaskarzinom. Chirurg 2011; 82: 981-988
  • 72 Neoptolemos LJP, Stocken DD, Tudur Smith C et al. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid vs. observation for pancreatic cancer: composite data from the ESPAC-1 and − 3(v1) trials. Br J Cancer 2009; 100: 246-250
  • 73 Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs. observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 297: 267-277
  • 74 http://www.springerlink.com/content/24027385637t8575/fulltext.pdf Stand: 29.11.2012
  • 75 http://www.aio-portal.de/index.php/studien-191.html Stand: 29.11.2012
  • 76 Chua TC, Saxena A. Extended pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1442-1452
  • 77 Nakao A, Takeda S, Inoue S et al. Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 2006; 30: 976-982
  • 78 Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 935-949
  • 79 Yekebas EF, Bogoevski D, Cataldegirmen G et al. En bloc vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies infiltrating major blood vessels: perioperative outcome and longterm survival in 136 patients. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 300-309
  • 80 Müller SA, Hartel M, Mehrabi A et al. Vascular resection in pancreatic cancer surgery: survival determinants. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 784-792
  • 81 Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y et al. Clinical implications of combined portal vein resection as a palliative procedure in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 1569-1578
  • 82 Wang C, Wu H, Xiong J et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for local advanced pancreatic head cancer: a single center retrospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 2183-2190
  • 83 Li B, Chen FZ, Ge XH et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction in treating carcinoma of the pancreatic head. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2004; 3: 612-615
  • 84 Harrison LE, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. Isolated portal vein involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A contraindication for resection?. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 342-347
  • 85 Riediger H, Makowiec F, Fischer E et al. Postoperative morbidity and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenterico-portal vein resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 1106-1115
  • 86 Büchler MW, Friess H, Müller MW et al. Randomized trial of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pylorus-preserving Whipple in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 65-69
  • 87 Klempa I, Spatny M, Menzel J et al. [Pancreatic function and quality of life after resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized comparative study after duodenum preserving resection of the head of the pancreas versus Whippleʼs operation]. Chirurg 1995; 66: 350-359