J Knee Surg 2013; 26(01): 059-064
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313754
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Impairs Function Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robert Pivec
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Aaron J. Johnson
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Qais Naziri
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Kimona Issa
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Michael A. Mont
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Peter M. Bonutti
2   Orthopaedic Surgery Unit, Bonutti Clinic, Effingham, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 August 2011

22 January 2012

Publication Date:
15 May 2012 (online)

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of lower back and leg pain in older adults. Stenosis is not considered a contraindication for total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, it is unclear whether it is associated with less than optimal postoperative outcomes. In a multicenter review of TKAs, 115 patients with lumbar disease were matched by age, gender, body mass index, type of procedure, and length of follow-up to patients who did not have stenosis. Spinal stenosis was found to be associated with significantly lower Knee Society objective and function scores compared with patients without stenosis. There was no observed difference in the revision rates (1%) or radiographic outcomes. Surgeons should consider cautioning patients that they can expect relief of arthritic symptoms following TKA, but they may continue to experience limitations in postoperative function relative to their expectations.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (4) 780-785
  • 2 Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ. Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments. J Orthop Traumatol 2010; 11 (4) 203-209
  • 3 Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B. The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (8) 1719-1724
  • 4 Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA, Sledge CB. Kinemax Outcomes Group. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86–A (10) 2179-2186
  • 5 Singh JA. Effect of comorbidity on quality of life of male veterans with prevalent primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28 (9) 1083-1089
  • 6 Santaguida PL, Hawker GA, Hudak PL , et al. Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Can J Surg 2008; 51 (6) 428-436
  • 7 Novicoff WM, Rion D, Mihalko WM, Saleh KJ. Does concomitant low back pain affect revision total knee arthroplasty outcomes?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (10) 2623-2629
  • 8 Saleh KJ, Santos ER, Ghomrawi HM, Parvizi J, Mulhall KJ. Socioeconomic issues and demographics of total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 446: 15-21
  • 9 Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH , et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J 2009; 9 (7) 545-550
  • 10 Watters III WC, Baisden J, Gilbert TJ , et al; North American Spine Society. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 2008; 8 (2) 305-310
  • 11 Singh K, Samartzis D, Vaccaro AR , et al. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis. Spine J 2005; 5 (6) 615-622
  • 12 Lohman CM, Tallroth K, Kettunen JA, Lindgren KA. Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis. Spine 2006; 31 (16) 1834-1840
  • 13 Pahl MA, Brislin B, Boden S , et al. The impact of four common lumbar spine diagnoses upon overall health status. Spine J 2006; 6 (2) 125-130
  • 14 Chen E, Tong KB, Laouri M. Surgical treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 2010; 10 (7) 588-594
  • 15 Tadokoro K, Miyamoto H, Sumi M, Shimomura T. The prognosis of conservative treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of patients over 70 years of age. Spine 2005; 30 (21) 2458-2463
  • 16 Haig AJ, Tong HC, Yamakawa KS , et al. Predictors of pain and function in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no back pain. Spine 2006; 31 (25) 2950-2957
  • 17 Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M , et al; Finnish Lumbar Spinal Research Group. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2007; 32 (1) 1-8
  • 18 Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10.  year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 2005; 30 (8) 936-943
  • 19 Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD , et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine 2010; 35 (14) 1329-1338
  • 20 Kennedy DM, Hanna SE, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD. Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (4) 559-566
  • 21 Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Suarez-Alma ME. Determinants of function after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2003; 83 (8) 696-706
  • 22 Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L , et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42 (8) 1722-1728
  • 23 Mounasamy V, Beizile EL, Moskal JT, Brown TE. Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and treatment. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2006; 18: 165-171
  • 24 Ritter MA, Stringer EA. Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (143) 115-119
  • 25 Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID. Kinemax Outcomes Group. Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (6) 1201-1207
  • 26 Wasielewski RC, Weed H, Prezioso C, Nicholson C, Puri RD. Patient comorbidity: relationship to outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 85-92
  • 27 Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF , et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002; 29 (6) 1273-1279
  • 28 Wasielewski RC, Weed H, Prezioso C, Nicholson C, Puri RD. Patient comorbidity: relationship to outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 85-92
  • 29 Meding JB, Reddleman K, Keating ME , et al. Total knee replacement in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (416) 208-216
  • 30 Papagelopoulos PJ, Idusuyi OB, Wallrichs SL, Morrey BF. Long term outcome and survivorship analysis of primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 330 (330) 124-132
  • 31 Yeung E, Jackson M, Sexton S, Walter W, Zicat B, Walter W. The effect of obesity on the outcome of hip and knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (6) 929-934
  • 32 Moon HK, Han CD, Yang IH, Cha BS. Factors affecting outcome after total knee arthroplasty in patients with diabetes mellitus. Yonsei Med J 2008; 49 (1) 129-137
  • 33 Gillespie GN, Porteous AJ. Obesity and knee arthroplasty. Knee 2007; 14 (2) 81-86
  • 34 Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A , et al. Effect of patient characteristics on reported outcomes after total knee replacement. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46 (1) 112-119
  • 35 Saleh KJ, Santos ER, Ghomrawi HM, Parvizi J, Mulhall KJ. Socioeconomic issues and demographics of total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 446: 15-21
  • 36 Mannion AF, Kämpfen S, Munzinger U, Kramers-de Quervain I. The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11 (5) R139
  • 37 Tomkins-Lane CC, Battié MC. Validity and reproducibility of self-report measures of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2010; 35 (23) 2097-2102
  • 38 Yuan PS, Booth Jr RE, Albert TJ. Nonsurgical and surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Instr Course Lect 2005; 54: 303-312
  • 39 Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O , et al. Depression and associated factors in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28 (7) 415-422
  • 40 Carragee EJ. Psychological and functional profiles in select subjects with low back pain. Spine J 2001; 1 (3) 198-204
  • 41 Rosenberger PH, Jokl P, Ickovics J. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14 (7) 397-405
  • 42 Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Suarez-Alma ME. Determinants of function after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2003; 83 (8) 696-706
  • 43 Minns Lowe CJ, Barker KL, Dewey M, Sackley CM. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2007; 335 (7624) 812