Arzneimittelforschung 2012; 62(03): 113-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1297964
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Tablet Formulations of Entecavir in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Single-Dose, Randomized-Sequence, Open-Label Crossover Study

J. Jin*
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
J. Liu*
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
J. Chen
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
L. Zhao
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
Z. Ma
2   Department of Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
X. Chen
2   Department of Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
M. Huang
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
G. Zhong
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received 08. November 2011

accepted 22. November 2011

Publikationsdatum:
20. Januar 2012 (online)

Abstract

A randomized, 2-way crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of entecavir (CAS 142217-69-4) tablets (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to meet the requirements for marketing the test product in China. Test and reference tablets were administered as a single dose on 2 treatment days separated by a 2-week washout period. Blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h following drug administration. Plasma concentration of entecavir was determined by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental model. Bioequivalence was determined by calculating 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ values for the test and reference products. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs, laboratory tests and interviews with the volunteers before administration and every 2 h during the study. The 90% CIs of entecavir for Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were 95.2–106.9%, 98.4–104.6% and 97.3–104.4%, respectively, which fell within the interval of 80–125%. No clinically important adverse effects were reported. These results suggested that the test formulation of entecavir tablets met the regulatory criterion for bioequivalence to the reference formulation.

*

*  Co-first authors


 
  • References

  • 1 McClune AC, Tong MJ. Chronic hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis 2010; 14: 461-476
  • 2 Zoulim F. Hepatitis: Treatment failure in chronic hepatitis B. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 8: 366-367
  • 3 Te HS, Jensen DM. Epidemiology of hepatitis B and C viruses: a global overview. Clin Liver Dis 2010; 14: 1-21 vii
  • 4 Matthews SJ. Entecavir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Clin Ther 2006; 28: 184-203
  • 5 Honkoop P, De Man RA. Entecavir: a potent new antiviral drug for hepatitis B. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2003; 12: 683-688
  • 6 Langley DR, Walsh AW, Baldick CJ et al. Inhibition of hepatitis B virus polymerase by entecavir. J Virol 2007; 81: 3992-4001
  • 7 Rivkin A. Entecavir: a new nucleoside analogue for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Drugs Today. Barc; 2007. 43. 201-220
  • 8 Cheng PN, Chang TT. Entecavir: a potent antiviral with minimal long-term resistance in nucleoside-naive chronic hepatitis B patients. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2008; 6: 569-579
  • 9 Yan JH, Bifano M, Olsen S et al. Entecavir pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability after multiple ascending doses in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 46: 1250-1258