Upper Body Skinfold Thickness is Related to Race Performance in Male Ironman Triathletes

Abstract

We investigated the association between skinfold thickness and race performance in male and female Ironman triathletes. Skinfold thicknesses at 8 sites and percent body fat were correlated to total race time including the split times for the 3 sub disciplines, for 27 male and 16 female Ironman athletes. In the males, percent body fat (r=0.76; p<0.0001), the sum of upper body skinfolds (r=0.75; p<0.0001) and the sum of all 8 skinfolds (r=0.71; p<0.0001) were related to total race time. Percent body fat (r=−0.67; p<0.001), the sum of upper body skinfolds (r=−0.63, p=0.0004) and the sum of all 8 skinfolds (r=−0.59; p<0.001) were also associated with speed in cycling during the race. In the females, none of the skinfold thicknesses showed an association with total race time, average weekly training volume or speed in the sub disciplines in the race. The results of this study indicate that low skinfold thicknesses of the upper body are related to race performance in male Ironman triathletes, but not in females.

Key words

long-distance triathlon - body fat - anthropometry - gender - body composition

References

• 1 Arrese AL, Ostáriz ES. Skinfold thicknesses associated with distance running performance in highly trained runners.  J Sports Sci. 2006;  24 69-76
• 2 Ball SD, Altena TS, Swan PD. Comparison of anthropometry to DXA: a new prediction equation for men.  Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;  58 1525-1531
• 3 Ball SD, Swan P, Desimone R. Accuracy of anthropometry compared to dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. A new generalizable equation for women.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 2004;  75 248-258
• 4 Bale P, Bradbury D, Colley E. Anthropometric and training variables related to 10 km running performance.  Br J Sports Med. 1986;  20 170-173
• 5 Becque MD, Katch VL, Moffatt RJ. Time course of skin-plus-fat compression in males and females.  Hum Biol. 1986;  58 33-42
• 6 Hagan RD, Smith MG, Gettman LR. Marathon performance in relation to maximal aerobic power and training indices.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1981;  13 185-189
• 7 Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T. Skin-fold thickness and training volume in ultra-triathletes.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 343-347
• 8 Knechtle B, Wirth A, Knechtle P, Zimmermann K, Kohler G. Personal best marathon performance is associated with performance in a 24-h run and not anthropometry or training volume.  Br J Sports Med. 2009;  43 836-839
• 9 Kostek MA, Pescatello LS, Seip RL, Angelopoulos TJ, Clarkson PM, Gordon PM, Moyna NM, Visich PS, Zoeller RF, Thompson PD, Hoffman EP, Price TB. Subcutaneous fat alterations resulting from an upper-body resistance training program.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;  39 1177-1185
• 10 Landers GJ, Blanksby BA, Ackland TR, Smith D. Morphology and performance of world championship triathletes.  Ann Hum Biol. 2000;  27 387-400
• 11 Leake CN, Carter JE. Comparison of body composition and somatotype of trained female triathletes.  J Sports Sci. 1991;  9 125-135
• 12 Lee RC, Wang Z, Heo M, Ross R, Janssen I, Heymsfield SB. Total-body skeletal muscle mass: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction models.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;  72 796-803
• 13 Legaz A, Eston R. Changes in performance, skinfold thicknesses, and fat patterning after three years of intense athletic conditioning in high level runners.  Br J Sports Med. 2005;  39 851-856
• 14 Legaz Arrese A, Munguía Izquierdo D, Serveto Galindo JR. Physiological measures associated with marathon running performance in high-level male and female homogenous groups.  Int J Sports Med. 2006;  27 289-295
• 15 Lepers R. Analysis of Hawaii Ironman performance in elite triathletes from 1981 to 2007.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;  40 1828-1834
• 16 O’Toole ML, Hiller DB, Crosby LO, Douglas PS. The ultraendurance triathlete: a physiological profile.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987;  19 45-50
• 17 O’Toole ML. Training for ultraendurance triathlon.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989;  21 S209-S213
• 18 Sleivert GG, Rowlands DS. Physical and physiological factors associated with success in the triathlon.  Sports Med. 1996;  22 8-18

Correspondence