Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 1986; 88(5): 165-172
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1210592
Original

© J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Differential Behavioural and Hormonal Responses to Two Different Stressors (Footshocking and Immobilization) in Sheep

E. Domański1 , F. Przekop1 , E. Wolińska-Witort1 , K. Mateusiak1 , L. Chomicka1 , S. Garwacki2
  • 1Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition of the Polish Academy of Sciences Jabłonna near Warsaw, Warsaw/Poland
  • 2Department of Pharmacology, Veterinary Faculty of School of Agriculture, Warsaw/Poland
Further Information

Publication History

1986

Publication Date:
16 July 2009 (online)

Summary

Two different Stressors footshocking and immobilization applied for 3 days induced in sheep differential behavioural and hormonal responses in cortisol and prolactin secretion. Immobilization drastically disturbed rumen motoric activity (significantly attenuated its contractions), caused loss of appetite and severe general depression. Footshocking did not induce any of these symptoms. Immobilization induced 2—3 fold higher rise of plasma cortisol mesors on the days of stressing as compared to footshocking. On the poststressing days after footshocking as well as after immobilization plasma cortisol mesors fell to 50% of the prestimulatory values. The rise of plasma prolactin mesors in footshocked and in immobilized animals on the days of stressing was nearly of the same magnitude. However, a significant difference in the response of prolactin secretion between footshocked and immobilized animals occurred in the circadian rhythmicity of the hormone secretion. Footshocking induced circadian rhythmicity with characteristic acrophases, while immobilization did not induce the circadian pattern of prolactin secretion. An attempt of interpretation of the described phenomena has been undertaken.

    >