Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2452-1354
Der Einsatz eines psychosozialen Screenings von Physiotherapeut*innen in Österreich
Querschnittstudie mittels Online-FragebogenThe Use of Psychosocial Screening by Physiotherapists in AustriaCross-sectional Study Using an Online Survey
Zusammenfassung
Gelbe Flaggen (Yellow Flags) tragen zur Entwicklung chronischer Schmerzen bei. Deren Bewertung mit Hilfe von Screening-Instrumenten wird in den höchsten Qualitätsleitlinien empfohlen. Wie sich jedoch herausstellte, erheben viele Physiotherapeut*innen (PTs) diese nicht. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, herauszufinden, welche Yellow Flags und welche entsprechenden Fragebögen für muskuloskelettal assoziierte Schmerzen von PTs in Österreich regelmäßig erhoben bzw. verwendet werden.
Eine selbst gestaltete Online-Umfrage mit Single-Choice-, Multiple-Choice- und offenen Fragen wurde über den Verteiler von Physio Austria und über Verteiler von Fachhochschulen verschickt. Nur PTs, die im muskuloskelettalen Bereich tätig sind, unabhängig vom spezifischen Arbeitssetting, wurden in diese Umfrage einbezogen.
Am Ende des Durchführungszeitraums nahmen 127 PTs an der Umfrage teil. Es ergaben sich dabei folgende Ergebnisse: (1) Die wichtigsten Yellow Flags, die zur Chronifizierung von muskuloskelettalen Schmerzen beitragen (Depressivität, anhaltender Stress, passive Bewältigungsstrategien, angstorientiertes Verhalten) werden von 75–91% der PTs (n=127) oft bis immer angegeben; (2) 50% der befragten PTs kennen keinen der genannten unidimensionalen Fragebögen (TSK etc.) und 51% kennen keinen der multidimensionalen Fragebögen (OMSQ etc.). PTs, die die entsprechenden Screening-Instrumente kennen, verwenden diese nur in sehr geringem Ausmaß oft bis immer.
Diese Untersuchung zeigt, dass einzelne Yellow Flags von den befragten PTs regelmäßig erhoben werden, aber nur 39% ein gezieltes Screening von Yellow Flags anwenden, obwohl sich immerhin 94% der Befragten für deren Erhebung verantwortlich fühlen.
Aufgrund der reduzierten Differenzierungsfähigkeit zwischen den einzelnen Flaggen bei muskuloskelettalen Schmerzen sollte für das Screening von Yellow Flags ein Screening-Tool eingesetzt werden. Damit die Durchführung eines standardisierten, von Leitlinien empfohlenen Screenings in Zukunft möglich wird, müssen PTs die entsprechenden multi- und unidimensionalen Fragebögen kennenlernen und die Fähigkeit erwerben, diese richtig einzusetzen.
Abstract
Yellow flags contribute to the development of chronic pain. Their assessment using screening tools is recommended in the highest quality guidelines. However, it turned out that many physiotherapists (PTs) do not collect these. The aim of this study was to find out which yellow flags and which corresponding questionnaires for musculoskeletal-associated pain are regularly used by PTs in Austria.
A self-designed online survey with single-choice, multiple-choice and open questions was sent via the Physio Austria mailing list and the mailing lists of universities of applied sciences. Only PTs working in the musculoskeletal field, regardless of the specific work setting, were included in this survey.
At the end of the implementation period, 127 PTs took part in the survey. The following results were obtained: (1) The most important yellow flags that contribute to the chronification of musculoskeletal pain (depression, persistent stress, passive coping strategies, anxiety-oriented behaviour) are often to always indicated by 75-91% of the PTs surveyed (n=127); (2) 50% of the PTs do not know any of the unidimensional questionnaires mentioned (TSK etc.) and 51% do not know any of the multidimensional questionnaires (OMSQ etc.). PTs familiar with the relevant screening instruments only use them to a minimal extent, often to always.
This study shows that individual yellow flags are regularly recorded by the PTs surveyed, but only 39% use targeted screening of yellow flags, although 94% of respondents feel responsible for recording them.
Due to the reduced ability to differentiate between the individual flags in musculoskeletal pain, a screening tool should be used to screen for yellow flags. In order for standardised screening recommended by guidelines to be possible in the future, PTs must become familiar with the relevant multi- and unidimensional questionnaires and acquire the ability to use them correctly.
Publication History
Received: 17 October 2023
Accepted: 14 January 2024
Article published online:
17 February 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ. et al. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors („yellow flags“) in patients with low back pain: A reappraisal. Phys Ther 2011; 91: 737-753
- 2 Meints SM, Edwards RR. Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes. Progr Neurosychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2018; 87: 168-182
- 3 Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K. et al. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2021; 396: 2006-2017
- 4 Lin I, Wiles L, Waller R. et al. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54: 79-86
- 5 Östhols S, Boström C, Rasmussen-Barr E. Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain – a survey among primary health care physiotherapists. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41: 2459-2467
- 6 Synnott A, O’Keeffe M, Bunzli S. et al. Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review. J Physiother 2015; 61: 68-76
- 7 Stearns ZR, Carvalho ML, Beneciuk JM. et al. Screening for Yellow Flags in Orthopaedic Physical Therapy: A Clinical Framework. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021; 51: 459-469
- 8 O’Keeffe M, George SZ, O’Sullivan PB. et al. Psychosocial factors in low back pain: letting go of our misconceptions can help management. Br J Sports Med 2019; 53: 793-794
- 9 Coronado RA, Brintz CE, McKernan LC. et al. Psychologically informed physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain: current approaches, implications, and future directions from recent randomized trials. Pain Rep 2020; 5: e847
- 10 Main CJ, George SZ. Psychologically informed practice for management of low back pain: future directions in practice and research. Phys Ther 2011; 91: 820-824
- 11 Young D, Callaghan M, Hunt C. et al. Psychologically informed approaches to chronic low back pain: Exploring musculoskeletal physiotherapists' attitudes and beliefs. Musculoskeletal Care 2019; 17: 272-276
- 12 Evasys. [Software]. Im Internet https://evasys.de Stand: 02.01.2023
- 13 Andrejeva N, Baumeister D, Eich W. et al. Psychosocial factors in the prevention of pain. Schmerz 2021; 35: 21-29
- 14 Geber C, Kappis B, Bäsch T. et al. Pain prevention in the primary care setting: Facts for resident physicians. Schmerz 2021; 35: 5-13
- 15 Hasenbring MI, Levenig C, Hallner D. et al. Psychosocial risk factors for chronic back pain in the general population and in competitive sports : From theory to clinical screening-a review from the MiSpEx network. Schmerz 2018; 32: 259-273
- 16 Veirman E, Van Ryckeghem DMK, De Paepe A. et al. 2019 Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies. Pain Rep 2019; 4: e775
- 17 Karstens S, Zebisch J, Wey J. et al Validation of the German version of the STarTMSK- Tool: A cohort study with patients from physiotherapy clinics. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0269694 0269694
- 18 George SZ, Beneciuk JM, Lentz TA. et al. Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome (OSPRO) for Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions: Results From the Validation Cohort. J Orthop Sports Physi Ther 2018; 48: 460-475
- 19 Lentz TA, Beneciuk JM, Bialosky JE. et al. Development of a yellow flag assessment tool for orthopaedic physical therapists: Results from the optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome (OSPRO) Cohort. J Orthop Sports Physi Ther 2016; 46: 327-343
- 20 Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2017; 389: 736-747
- 21 Mayring P. Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 11. Aufl. Beltz Juventa: 2022
- 22 Ahmed SA, Shantharam G, Eltorai AEM. et al. The effect of psychosocial measures of resilience and self-efficacy in patients with neck and lower back pain. Spine J 2019; 19: 232-237
- 23 Falla D, Peolsson A, Peterson G. et al. Perceived pain extent is associated with disability, depression and self-efficacy in individuals with whiplash-associated disorders. Eur J Pain 2016; 20: 1490-1501
- 24 Martinez-Calderon J, Zamora-Campos C, Navarro-Ledesma S. et al. The Role of Self-Efficacy on the Prognosis of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review. J Pain 2018; 19: 10-34
- 25 Wassinger CA, Sole G. Agreement and screening accuracy between physical therapists ratings and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in screening for risk of chronic pain during Musculoskeletal evaluation. Physiother Theory Pract 2022; 38: 2949-2955
- 26 Beales D, Kendell M, Chang RP. et al. Association between the 10 item Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire and physiotherapists’ perception of the contribution of biopsychosocial factors in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Man Ther 2016; 23: 48-55
- 27 WKO. Rahmenvereinbarungen von Physio Austria mit der ÖGK. (21.10.2021). Im Internet https://bit.ly/3BE5RHh Stand: 09.06.2023