Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2405-1778
Predictors of Vaginal Delivery among Patients Admitted with Severe Preeclampsia
Funding None.Abstract
Objective This study aimed to assess the rates of vaginal delivery (VD) and the predictors of VD in a cohort of patients with early (<34 weeks) preeclampsia with severe features (Early Severe PreEClampsia [ESPEC]).
Study Design We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ESPEC admitted to a single center from 2013 to 2019. Exclusion criteria included patients with contraindications to labor, multifetal gestation, or presenting in spontaneous labor. Patient characteristics were abstracted. The primary outcome was rate of VD. Secondary outcome was factors associated with VD. Secondary analysis performed including only primiparous patients. Bivariate statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze data.
Results Of 229 patients with ESPEC, 184 (80%) were candidates for labor. Of those, 74 (40%) underwent prelabor cesarean delivery (CD). Among the 110 remaining patients who attempted VD, 47 (43%) were successful. No significant differences in characteristics between VD and CD patients were found on bivariate analysis. In regression models, BMI ≥ 40 was associated with increased odds of CD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 7.95), whereas private insurance was associated with reduced odds of CD (aOR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.86). In planned secondary analysis of primiparous patients, 101/123 (82%) were candidates for labor. Of those, 29 underwent prelabor CD. The VD rate among primiparous patients attempting labor was 40% (29/72). In this subgroup, private insurance was associated with VD (71 vs. 46%, p = 0.03). In regression models, only private insurance remained associated with CD (aOR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.92).
Conclusion Patients with ESPEC who attempted VD were successful less than half of the time, with similar rates among the subset of primiparous patients. BMI ≥ 40 was associated with increased odds of CD, whereas private insurance was associated with reduced odds of CD. These data may aid providers in counseling patients with ESPEC on the likelihood of successful VD.
Key Points
-
Only 43% of ESPEC patients who attempted VD were successful.
-
Subset of primiparous patients w/ESPEC had similar VD rate.
-
BMI ≥40 kg/m2 in ESPEC patients was associated with increased odds of CD.
Keywords
preeclampsia - preterm vaginal delivery - early preeclampsia with severe features - obesity - cesarean delivery - predictorsPublication History
Received: 05 March 2024
Accepted: 25 August 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
29 August 2024
Article published online:
17 September 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Dillon JL, Darling AJ, Myers S. et al. Risk factors for adverse maternal outcomes among patients with severe preeclampsia before 34 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226 (01) S299
- 2 van Eerden L, Gaugler-Senden I, de Vries RJ, Zeeman GG, de Groot CJM, Bolte AC. Mode of delivery in severe preeclampsia before 28 weeks' gestation: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2018; 73 (08) 469-474
- 3 Pretscher J, Weiss C, Dammer U. et al. Influence of preeclampsia on induction of labor at term: a cohort study. In Vivo 2020; 34 (03) 1195-1200
- 4 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135 (06) 1492-1495
- 5 Blackwell SC, Redman ME, Tomlinson M. et al. Labor induction for the preterm severe pre-eclamptic patient: is it worth the effort?. J Matern Fetal Med 2001; 10 (05) 305-311
- 6 Hoxha I, Syrogiannouli L, Braha M, Goodman DC, da Costa BR, Jüni P. Caesarean sections and private insurance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017; 7 (08) e016600
- 7 Lutsiv O, Mah J, Beyene J, McDonald SD. The effects of morbid obesity on maternal and neonatal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Obes Rev 2015; 16 (07) 531-546