Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2340-0697
Systematic review

EUS vs. ERCP-guided primary drainage of inoperable distal malignant biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Tawfik Khoury
1   gastroenterology and hepatology departement, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel (Ringgold ID: RIN61255)
,
Wisam Sbeit
2   Gastroenterology, Nahariya Western Galilee Hospital, Nahariya, Israel (Ringgold ID: RIN61255)
,
Fabien Fumex
3   Gastroenterology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
,
Giovanni Marasco
4   Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9296)
,
Leonardo Henri Eusebi
5   Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18508)
,
6   Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
,
7   Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
,
Amir Shahin
8   Department of Gastroenterology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel (Ringgold ID: RIN61255)
,
Maamoun Basheer
8   Department of Gastroenterology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel (Ringgold ID: RIN61255)
,
Rodica Gincul
9   Department of Gastroenterology, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN89686)
,
Sarah Leblanc
10   Gastroenterology, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN89686)
,
11   Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
,
Jeremie Jacques
12   service d'hépato-gastro-entérologie, CHU Dupuytren Limoges, Limoges, France
,
13   Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9296)
,
Bertrand Napoleon
14   endoscopy unit, Centre Chirurgical Lyon Mermoz, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN89686)
› Author Affiliations

Background and Aims: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as first-line interventions in distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). We assessed the efficacy and safety of these two approaches. Methods: A PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases bibliographic search until 01/12/2023 was performed to identify RCTs comparing EUS-BD to ERCP for primary biliary drainage in inoperable patients with DMBO. Primary outcome was technical success. Secondary outcomes were clinical success, adverse events (AEs), mean procedure time, 1-year stent patency, and overall survival. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effect model. Results: Five studies (519 patients) were included. The RR for pooled technical success in EUS-BD was 1.06 ([0.96-1.17]; P=0.27) and 1.02 [0.97–1.08]; P=0.45) for clinical success. 1-year stent patency was similar among the two groups (RR 1.15; [0.94–1.42], P=0.17), with lower reintervention in the EUS-BD group (RR 0.58; [0.37–0.9]; P=0.01). The RR of AEs rate was 0.85 [0.49–1.46]; P=0.55) and severe AEs of 0.97 [0.10–0.17]; P=0.98). On subgroup analysis, EUS-lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) outperformed ERCP in term of technical success (RR 1.17; [1.01–1.35]; P=0.03). Procedure time was lower in EUS-BD (standardized mean difference -2.36 minutes; [-2.68 to -2.05]; P<0.001). Conclusions: EUS-BD showed a statistically significant lower re-intervention rate compared to ERCP, but with similar technical success rate, stent patency, clinical success rate and safety profile, while in the subgroup of EUS-LAMS, the technical success was better than ERCP Keywords: distal; biliary obstruction; efficacy; safety;



Publication History

Received: 18 January 2024

Accepted after revision: 06 June 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
06 June 2024

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany