Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40(01): 078-086
DOI: 10.1055/a-2071-3250
Original Article

Technical Variables in Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction

Joani M. Christensen
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
,
Leah Ahn
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Mara Z. Meulendijks
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
David Iskhakov
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Frankie Wong
3   Harvard Plastic Surgery Residency Training Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Jonathan Winograd
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Ian L. Valerio
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Curtis L. Cetrulo Jr.
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Lydia A. Helliwell
4   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Kyle R. Eberlin
2   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations Funding The authors received no financial support for this work.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Lower extremity free flap failure rates are higher than in other areas of the body. While prior studies assessed the effect of intraoperative technical variables, these generally investigated individual variables and did not examine relationships between the many individual technical decisions made during free tissue reconstruction. Our purpose was to investigate the effect of variation in intraoperative microsurgical techniques on flap outcomes in a diverse cohort of patients requiring lower extremity free flap coverage.

Methods Consecutive patients undergoing free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity at two level 1 trauma centers from January 2002 to January 2020 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes, followed by a review of medical records. Information regarding demographics and comorbidities, indications, intraoperative technical details, and complications was collected. Outcomes of interest included an unplanned return to the operating room, arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, partial flap failure, and total flap failure. Bivariate analysis was performed.

Results In total, 410 patients underwent 420 free tissue transfers. The median follow-up time was 17 months (interquartile ranges: 8.0–37). Total flap failure occurred in 4.9% (n = 20), partial flap failure in 5.9% (n = 24), and unplanned reoperation in 9.0% (n = 37), with arterial thrombosis in 3.2% (n = 13) and venous thrombosis in 5.4% (n = 22). Overall complications were significantly associated with recipient artery choice, with arteries other than PT and AT/DP having a higher rate (p = 0.033), and with arterial revisions (p = 0.010). Total flap failure was also associated with revision of the arterial anastomosis (p = 0.035), and partial flap failure was associated with recipient artery choice (p = 0.032).

Conclusion Many interoperative options and techniques are available when performing microvascular lower extremity reconstruction that leads to equally high success rates. However, the use of arterial inflow outside of the posterior tibial and anterior tibial arteries leads to a higher overall complication rate and partial flap failure rate. Intraoperative revision of the arterial anastomosis portends poorly for ultimate flap survival.

Keywords

free flap - lower extremity - microsurgery - microvascular lower extremity - reconstruction - limb salvage


Publication History

Received: 03 March 2022

Accepted: 19 March 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
11 April 2023

Article published online:
21 May 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Harashina T. Analysis of 200 free flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1988; 41 (01) 33-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Muramatsu K, Shigetomi M, Ihara K, Kawai S, Doi K. Vascular complication in free tissue transfer to the leg. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (08) 362-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wong FK, Christensen JM, Meulendijks MZ, Ahn L, Iskhakov D, Eberlin KR. Secondary surgery after lower extremity free tissue reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (10s): 80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Khouri RK, Shaw WW. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: a 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1989; 29 (08) 1086-1094
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB. et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (04) 1153-1160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Consecutive 265 profunda artery perforator flaps: refinements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (04) e2682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Heiman AJ, Gabbireddy SR, Kotamarti VS, Ricci JA. A meta-analysis of autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (04) 336-345
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chaivanichsiri P. Influence of recipient vessels on free tissue transplantation of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (04) 970-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tian J, Chen ZB, Li J. Use of muscle feeding arteries as recipient vessels for soft tissue reconstruction in lower extremities. Curr Med Sci 2020; 40 (04) 739-744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Liu J, Wu Y, Zhou M. et al. Repair of severe peri-knee soft tissue defect using an anterolateral thigh flap with the descending genicular vessels as the recipient pedicle: a case series of 14 patients. Ann Palliat Med 2021; 10 (05) 5341-5350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Fang T, Zhang EW, Lineaweaver WC, Zhang F. Recipient vessels in the free flap reconstruction around the knee. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 71 (04) 429-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fu J, Gao J, Yi Y. et al. The clinical application of medial sural vessels as recipient vessels in repairing traumatic tissue defects in the lower limbs. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 84 (04) 418-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hong JP, Park CJ, Suh HP. Importance of vascularity and selecting the recipient vessels of lower extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 83-88
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stranix JT, Borab ZM, Rifkin WJ. et al. Proximal versus distal recipient vessels in lower extremity reconstruction: a retrospective series and systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (05) 334-340
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Power HA, Cho J, Kwon JG. et al. Are perforators reliable as recipient arteries in lower extremity reconstruction? analysis of 423 free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (03) 750-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hallock GG. Both superficial and deep extremity veins can be used successfully as the recipient site for free flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 44 (06) 633-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lorenzo AR, Lin CH, Lin CH. et al. Selection of the recipient vein in microvascular flap reconstruction of the lower extremity: analysis of 362 free-tissue transfers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (05) 649-655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Broer PN, Moellhoff N, Mayer JM, Heidekrueger PI, Ninkovic M, Ehrl D. Comparison of outcomes of end-to-end versus end-to-side anastomoses in lower extremity free flap reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (06) 432-437
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jandali S, Wu LC, Vega SJ, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. 1000 consecutive venous anastomoses using the microvascular anastomotic coupler in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (03) 792-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kulkarni AR, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL. et al. Venous thrombosis in handsewn versus coupled venous anastomoses in 857 consecutive breast free flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (03) 178-182
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Stranix JT, Rifkin WJ, Lee ZH. et al. Comparison of hand-sewn versus coupled venous anastomoses in traumatic lower extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (01) 31-36
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Medina ND, Fischer JP, Fosnot J, Serletti JM, Wu LC, Kovach III SJ. Lower extremity free flap outcomes using an anastomotic venous coupler device. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (02) 176-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ducic I, Brown BJ, Rao SS. Lower extremity free flap reconstruction outcomes using venous coupler. Microsurgery 2011; 31 (05) 360-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kisser U, Adderson-Kisser C, Baumeister P, Reiter M. Influence of coupler size on revision rate and timing of revision after free flap tissue transfer in the head and neck. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275 (01) 199-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hanson SE, Mitchell MB, Palivela N. et al. Smaller diameter anastomotic coupling devices have higher rates of venous thrombosis in microvascular free tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (06) 1293-1300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Patterson CW, Stalder MW, Richardson W, Steele T, Wise MW, St Hilaire H. Timing of free flaps for traumatic wounds of the lower extremity: have advances in perioperative care changed the treatment algorithm?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (08) 616-621
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lee SY, Seong IH, Park BY. When is the critical time for soft tissue reconstruction of open tibia fracture patients?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (03) 249-255
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lee ZH, Stranix JT, Levine JP. The optimal timing of traumatic lower extremity reconstruction: current consensus. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48 (02) 259-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Piwnica-Worms W, Stranix JT, Othman S. et al. Risk factors for lower extremity amputation following attempted free flap limb salvage. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 528-533
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Black CK, Ormiston LD, Fan KL, Kotha VS, Attinger C, Evans KK. Amputations versus salvage: reconciling the differences. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 32-41
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Azoury SC, Stranix JT, Kovach SJ, Levin LS. Principles of orthoplastic surgery for lower extremity reconstruction: why is this important?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 42-50
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kim KG, Tirrell AR, Dekker PK. et al. The need to improve patient-centered outcome reporting following lower extremity flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (09) 764-773
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mundy LR, Klassen A, Sergesketter AR. et al. Content validity of the LIMB-Q: a patient-reported outcome instrument for lower extremity trauma patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (09) 625-633
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 van Bekkum S, de Jong T, Zuidam M, Mureau MAM. Long-term quality of life after free flap upper extremity reconstruction for traumatic injuries. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (03) 213-222
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar