Download PDF
Hebamme 2023; 36(03): 49-56
DOI: 10.1055/a-2060-5249
Geburt

Leitlinienkonforme Herzfrequenzmessung: Welche Kriterien erleichtern die Umsetzung?

Jasmin Goebel
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die S3-Leitlinie vaginale Geburt am Termin empfiehlt bei Low-Risk-Gebärenden die intermittierende Auskultation zur Überwachung der Herzfrequenz des Ungeborenen. Eine Bachelorarbeit untersuchte unter anderem, wie sicher sich das Fachpersonal bei der Umsetzung der leitlinienkonformen Messung der fetalen Herzfrequenz fühlt.



Publication History

Article published online:
20 June 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM.. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013; 5: CD006066
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Alfirevic Z, Gyte GML, Cuthbert A. et al. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017; 2: CD006066
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Andersen MM, Thisted DL, Amer-Wåhlin I. et al. Can intrapartum cardiotocography predict uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean delivery?: a population based case-control study. PloS one 2016; 11: e0146347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Arnold JJ, Gawrys BL.. Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring. American family physician 2020; 102: 158-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2015; 131: 13-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bassel H, Al Wattar BH, Honess E. et al. Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. CMAJ 2021; 193: E468-E477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Berger R, Maul H, Kehl S. et al. Stellungnahme der AGG mitgetragen von DGGG und DGPGM zur S3-Leitlinie „Vaginale Geburt am Termin“. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2021; 81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bruno AM, López JD, Stout MJ. et al. Acidemia Can Occur Despite Category I Tracing. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37: 762-768
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Nationale Gesundheitsziel: Gesundheit rund um die Geburt (2017). Im Internet: https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/5_Publikationen/Gesundheit/Broschueren/Nationales_Gesundheitsziel_-_Gesundheit_rund_um_die_Geburt_barrierefrei.pdf Stand: 09.04.2023
  • 10 Clark SL, Hamilton EF, Garite TJ. et al. The Limits of Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in the Prevention of Neonatal Metabolic Acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216: 163: e1-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e. V. (DGGG), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft (dghwi). Vaginale Geburt am Termin. AWMF-Leitlinie. Registernummer 015/083. Langfassung (2020). Im Internet: www.awmf.org/assets/guidelines/015-083I_Vaginale-Geburt-am-Termin_2021-03.pdf Stand: 08.04.2023
  • 12 Devane D, Lalor JG, Daly S. et al. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database of Reviews 2017; 1: CD005122
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Engelhart CH, Nilsen ABV, Pay ASD. et al. Practice, skills and experience with the Pinard stethoskope for intrapartum Foetel monitoring: Focus group interviews with Norwegian midwives. Midwifery 2022; 108: 103288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fox D, Coddington R, Scarf V.. Wanting to be 'with woman', not with machine: Midwives' experiences of caring for women being continuously monitored in labour. Women and birth: Women and Birth 2022; 35: 387-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gnirs JL, Schneider KTM, Schiermeier S.. Geburtsüberwachung. In: Schneider H, Husslein PW, Schneider K, Hrsg. Die Geburtshilfe. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2015
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Gruber P, Oehler-Rahmann K, Schwarz C.. CTG – verstehen, bewerten, dokumentieren. 7. Aufl. Hannover: Elvin Staude; 2020
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Harder U.. Methoden der kindlichen Herztonkontrolle. Stiefel A, Brendel K, Bauer N, Hrsg. Hebammenkunde. 6. Aktualisierte Aufl. Stuttgart/New York: Thieme; 2020. 512.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Heelan-Fancer LM, Shi L, Zhang Y. et al. Impact of continuouse elecronic fetal monitoring on birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancies. Birth 2019; 46: 311-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hösli I, Büchel J.. Intrapartales Kardiotokogramm. Gynäkologe 2017; 50: 695-709
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hruban L, Spilka J, Chudáček V. et al. Obstetrician agreement on CTG records. J Eval Clin Pract 2015; 21: 694-702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 International childbirth initiative. 12 steps to Safe and Respectfull MotherBaby-Family Maternity Care (2021). Im Internet: https://icichildbirth.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11Step-2.pdf Stand: 08.04.2023
  • 22 Kumari VR, Indiramani CK, Chakravarthy K.. A comparative study of perinatal outcome in low risk pregnancies with CTG monitoring and intermittent auscultation. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2015; 4: 17038-17042
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Longo M, Hankins GDV.. Defining cerebral palsy: pathogenesis, pathophysiology and new intervention. Minerva Ginecol 2009; 61: 421-429
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Maude RM, Skinner JP, Foureur MJ.. Intelligent Structured Intermittent Auscultation (ISIA): evaluation of a decision-making framework for fetal heart monitoring of low risk women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Medical Birth Registry Norway. Fähigkeiten der IA gehen bei Nichtnutzung verloren (2018). Im Internet: https://www.fhi.no/en/hn/health-registries/medical-birth-registry-of-norway/medical-birth-registry-ofnorway/ Stand: 09.04.2023
  • 26 Mother Hood. Was bedeutet „sichere Geburt“? (2022). Im Internet: https://mother-hood.de/informieren/was-bedeutet-sichere-geburt/; Standt Stand: 09.04.2023
  • 27 Nageotte MP.. Fetal heart rate monitoring. Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine 2015; 20: 144-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 National Institute for Health and Care-Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum Care. Care of healthy woman and their babies during childbirth. Clinical guideline [CG 190]. NICE CG190 2014 updated 02/2017 Version 2 (2017). Im Internet: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-248734770 Stand: 09.04.2023
  • 29 Nelson KB, Grether JK.. Causes of cerebral palsy. Curr Opin Pediatr 1999; 11: 487-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Paquette S, Moretti F, O’Reilly K. et al. The incidence of maternal artefact during intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014; 36: 962-968
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Pinto P, Costa-Santos C, Gonçalves H. et al. Improvements in fetal heart rate analysis by the removal of maternal-fetal heart rate ambiguities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rei M, Tavares S, Pinto P. et al. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2016; 205: 27-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Reif P, Schott S, Boyon C. et al. Does knowledge of fetal outcome influence the interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocography and subsequent clinical management? A multicentere European study. BJOG 2016; 123: 2208-2217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR. , Schiermeier et al. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2013; 75: 101-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sartwelle TP, Johnston JC.. Cerebral palsy litigation: change course or abandon ship. Journal of Child Neurology 2014; 30: 828-841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sartwelle TP.. Electronic fetal monitoring: a bridge too far. The Journal of Legal Medicine 2012; 33: 313-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schiermeier S, Westhof G, Leven A. et al. Intra-and interobserver variability of intrapartum cardiotocography: a multicenter study comparing the FIGO classification with computer analysis software. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation 2011; 72: 169-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schneider KTM, Gnirs J, Schiermeier S.. Antepartuale Überwachung. Schneider KTM, Hrsg. Die Geburtshilfe. 5. Aufl. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. 217. 253
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Schwarz C.. 40 Jahre und kein bisschen weiser – Kann das CTG Babys retten? Eine Bestandsaufnahme des Nutzens der intrapartalen Kardiotokographie. Hebamme CH 2015; 1: 4-9
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Schwarz C. Auskultation und CTG – Evidenz und aktuelle praktische Empfehlungen. 2019 Im Internet https://hebammenkongress.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Schwarz_Christiane_Evidenz-und-aktuellepraktische-Empfehlungen-zur-Auskultation-und-CTG_S25_Mi_Kongress_2019.pdf Stand: 09.04.2023
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Sean EM, Alexandra GE. 10 tips for overcoming common challenges of intrapartum fetal monitoring. OBG Manag 2016; 28: 34-36 38–42, 44–46
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Small KA, Sidebotham M, Fenwick J. et al. Intrapartum cardiotocograph monitoring and perinatal outecomes for women at risk: Literature review. Women and Birth 2020; 33: 411-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zain HA, Wright JW, Parrish GE.. Interpreting the fetal heart rate tracing. Effect of knowledge of neonatal outcome. The Journal of reproductive medicine 1998; 43: 367-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar