Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40(01): 012-022
DOI: 10.1055/a-2056-0629
Original Article

Lower Extremity Reconstruction with Anterolateral Thigh Free-Flap Anastomoses: A Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis

Sanjay K.A. Jinka 
1   College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio
,
Ashoka G.K. Jinka
2   Independent Computational Modeling Consultant, Maumee, Ohio
,
Jeffrey E. Janis
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The anterolateral thigh free flap is an option for repairing soft tissue defects of the distal lower extremity. This flap uses the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral (LCF) artery as the flap vessel. The recipient vessel in these flaps is often the anterior tibial (AT), posterior tibial (PT), or peroneal (P) arteries. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) evaluation of anastomoses between these vessels can optimize outcomes.

Methods Thirty-eight CFD models were created to model end-to-side (ETS) and end-to-end (ETE) anastomoses for lower extremity reconstruction. Seven out of thirty-eight models represented ETS anastomoses between the LCF and AT arteries with varying anastomotic angles. Nine out of thirty-eight models represented 45-degree ETS anastomoses between varying diameters of the LCF and AT, PT, and P arteries. Nine out of thirty-eight models represented stenosis on the flap vessel and recipient vessel, pre- and post-bifurcation. Nine out of thirty-eight models represented ETE anastomoses, rather than ETS, with varying vessel diameters. Four out of thirty-eight models represented ETE anastomoses with varying regions and levels of stenosis.

Results Stasis of blood flow in ETS models increased as anastomotic angle increased in a logarithmic relationship (R 2 = 0.918). Flow was optimized overall as flap and recipient vessel diameters approached one another. In ETS models, flap vessel and postbifurcation recipient vessel stenosis were found to substantially increase stasis.

Conclusion Selection of flap and recipient vessels with similar diameters can optimize outcomes in microvascular anastomoses. In the context of lower extremity reconstruction with the ALT flap, the PT artery can be recommended as a first-line recipient vessel due to its similar vessel caliber to the LCF and relative ease of surgical access compared with the P artery. Avoidance of areas of stenosis is recommended to ensure laminar flow and reduce the operative difficulty associated with performing anastomoses on nonpliable arteries. Striving for increased acuity of anastomotic angles is recommended to optimize the flow in ETS microvascular anastomoses.

Keywords

lower extremity reconstruction - anterolateral thigh free flap - microvascular anastomoses - computational fluid dynamics - end-to-side - end-to-end


Publication History

Received: 28 July 2022

Accepted: 28 February 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 March 2023

Article published online:
24 April 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Grotting JC, Vasconez LO. Regional blood supply and the selection of flaps for reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1986; 13 (04) 581-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nemoto M, Ishikawa S, Kounoike N, Sugimoto T, Takeda A. Free flap transfer to preserve main arterial flow in early reconstruction of open fracture in the lower extremity. Plast Surg Int 2015; 2015: 213892
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kang MJ, Chung CH, Chang YJ, Kim KH. Reconstruction of the lower extremity using free flaps. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40 (05) 575-583
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rossi MJ, Zolper EG, Bekeny JC. et al. Free tissue transfer using end-to-side arterial anastomosis for limb salvage in patients with lower extremity arterial disease. J Vasc Surg 2020; 72 (01) e268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Broer PN, Moellhoff N, Mayer JM, Heidekrueger PI, Ninkovic M, Ehrl D. Comparison of outcomes of end-to-end versus end-to-side anastomoses in lower extremity free flap reconstructions. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (06) 432-437
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Samaha FJ, Oliva A, Buncke GM, Buncke HJ, Siko PP. A clinical study of end-to-end versus end-to-side techniques for microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (04) 1109-1111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pederson WC, Grome L. Microsurgical reconstruction of the lower extremity. Semin Plast Surg 2019; 33 (01) 54-58
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chen HC, Coskunfirat OK, Özkan O. et al. Guidelines for the optimization of microsurgery in atherosclerotic patients. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (05) 356-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hage JJ, Woerdeman LAE. Lower limb necrosis after use of the anterolateral thigh free flap: is preoperative angiography indicated?. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52 (03) 315-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lee YK, Park KY, Koo YT. et al. Analysis of multiple risk factors affecting the result of free flap transfer for necrotising soft tissue defects of the lower extremities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (05) 624-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chow LC, Napoli A, Klein MB, Chang J, Rubin GD. Vascular mapping of the leg with multi-detector row CT angiography prior to free-flap transplantation. Radiology 2005; 237 (01) 353-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Serletti JM, Deuber MA, Guidera PM. et al. Atherosclerosis of the lower extremity and free-tissue reconstruction for limb salvage. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (05) 1136-1144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 van der Feen C, Neijens FS, Kanters SDJM, Mali WP, Stolk RP, Banga JD. Angiographic distribution of lower extremity atherosclerosis in patients with and without diabetes. Diabet Med 2002; 19 (05) 366-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gallino A, Aboyans V, Diehm C. et al; European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Peripheral Circulation. Non-coronary atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J 2014; 35 (17) 1112-1119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Scott Levin L, Baumeister S. Lower extremity. In: Wei FC, Mardini S. eds. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. W.B. Saunders; 2009: 63-70
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Lorbeer R, Grotz A, Dörr M. et al. Reference values of vessel diameters, stenosis prevalence, and arterial variations of the lower limb arteries in a male population sample using contrast-enhanced MR angiography. PLoS One 2018; 13 (06) e0197559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 The OpenFOAM Foundation. OpenFOAM.; 2021
    PubMed
  • 18 Liu H, Lan L, Abrigo J. et al. Comparison of Newtonian and Non-Newtonian fluid models in blood flow simulation in patients with intracranial arterial stenosis. Front Physiol 2021; 12 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.718540.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Silva Jde A, Karam-Filho J, Borges CCH. Computational analysis of anastomotic angles by blood flow conditions in side-to-end radio-cephalic fistulae used in hemodialysis. J Biomed Sci Eng 2015; 8 (03) 131-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wendkos MH, Rossman PL. The normal blood pressure in the lower extremity. Am Heart J 1943; 26 (05) 623-630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sheppard JP, Lacy P, Lewis PS, Martin U. Blood Pressure Measurement Working Party of the British and Irish Hypertension Society. Measurement of blood pressure in the leg-a statement on behalf of the British and Irish Hypertension Society. J Hum Hypertens 2020; 34 (06) 418-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Slater J. Validation assessment. Accessed December 7, 2022 at: https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/valid/tutorial/valassess.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pu LLQ. A comprehensive approach to lower extremity free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (02) e1228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mao H, Xu G. A retrospective study of end-to-side venous anastomosis for free flap in extremity reconstruction. Int J Surg 2015; 17: 72-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lowe GDO. Virchow's triad revisited: abnormal flow. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2003; 33 (5-6): 455-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jinka SK, Jinka AG, Janis JE. Computational fluid dynamic evaluation of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap end-to-side anastomosis. Cureus 2022; 14 (05) e24650
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Zhang L, Moskovitz M, Piscatelli S, Longaker MT, Siebert JW. Hemodynamic study of different angled end-to-side anastomoses. Microsurgery 1995; 16 (02) 114-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sen C, Hasanov A. Comparative geometric analysis of diamond and hole techniques in end-to-side microvascular anastomosis. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (04) 262-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ooi ASH, Butz DR, Fisher SM, Collier ZJ, Gottlieb LJ. Geometric three-dimensional end-to-side microvascular anastomosis: a simple and reproducible technique. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (04) 258-263
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hofer M, Rappitsch G, Perktold K, Trubel W, Schima H. Numerical study of wall mechanics and fluid dynamics in end-to-side anastomoses and correlation to intimal hyperplasia. J Biomech 1996; 29 (10) 1297-1308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Harris JR, Seikaly H, Calhoun K, Daugherty E. Effect of diameter of microvascular interposition vein grafts on vessel patency and free flap survival in the rat model. J Otolaryngol 1999; 28 (03) 152-157
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Monsivais JJ. Microvascular grafts: effect of diameter discrepancy on patency rates. Microsurgery 1990; 11 (04) 285-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Chen HC, Chuang CC, Chen S, Hsu WM, Wei FC. Selection of recipient vessels for free flaps to the distal leg and foot following trauma. Microsurgery 1994; 15 (05) 358-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 McCaughan JJ. Successful arterial grafts to the anterior tibial, posterior tibial (below the peroneal), and peroneal arteries. Angiology 1961; 12 (03) 91-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Dardik H, Dardik I, Veith FJ. Exposure of the tibial-peroneal arteries by a single lateral approach. Surgery 1974; 75 (03) 377-382
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Burusapat C, Nanasilp T, Kunaphensaeng P, Ruamthanthong A. Effect of atherosclerosis on the lateral circumflex femoral artery and its descending branch: comparative study to nonatherosclerotic risk. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (09) e856
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Wikström J, Hansen T, Johansson L, Ahlström H, Lind L. Lower extremity artery stenosis distribution in an unselected elderly population and its relation to a reduced ankle-brachial index. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50 (02) 330-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tsai YT, Lin TS. The suitability of end-to-side microvascular anastomosis in free flap transfer for limb reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (02) 171-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Pafitanis G, Nicolaides M, O'Connor EF. et al. Microvascular anastomotic arterial coupling: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (06) 1286-1302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Mücke T, Reeps C, Wolff KD, Mitchell DA, Fichter AM, Scholz M. Objective qualitative and quantitative assessment of blood flow with near-infrared angiography in microvascular anastomoses in the rat model. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (04) 287-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar