Non-drainage Offers Faster Proprioceptive and Functional Recovery, and More Clinical Benefits for Patients following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Drainage

Abstract

Background Although a non-drainage procedure following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming more acceptable in enhanced recovery after surgery, postoperative drainage is still commonly used in TKA surgeries. This study aimed to compare the non-drainage to the drainage during the early postoperative stage regarding proprioceptive and functional recovery, and postoperative outcomes of TKA patients.

Material and Methods A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial was carried out on 91 TKA patients, who were randomly allocated into the non-drainage group (NDG) or the drainage group (DG). Patients were evaluated regarding knee proprioception, functional outcomes, pain intensity, range of motion, knee circumference, and anesthetic consumption. Outcomes were assessed at the time of charge, at postoperative 7th day, and at postoperative 3rd month.

Results There were no differences between groups at baseline (p > 0.05). During the inpatient period, the NDG experienced superior pain relief (p < 0.05), had a higher Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (p = 0.001), demanded lower assistance from a sitting position to a standing position (p = 0.001) and walking for 4.5 m (p = 0.034), and performed the Timed Up and Go test in a shorter duration (p = 0.016) compared to the DG. The NDG gained the actively straight leg raise earlier (p = 0.009), needed lower anesthetic consumption (p < 0.05), and showed improved proprioception (p < 0.05) compared to the DG during the inpatient period.

Conclusions Our findings support that a non-drainage procedure would be a better option to provide a faster proprioceptive and functional recovery, and beneficial results for patients following TKA. Therefore, the non-drainage procedure should be the first choice in TKA surgery rather than drainage.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Obwohl ein Verfahren ohne Drainage nach Knietotalendoprothetik (TKA) für eine verbesserte Genesung nach der Operation zunehmend akzeptabler wird, wird bei TKA-Operationen immer noch häufig eine postoperative Drainage verwendet. Diese Studie zielte darauf ab, die Nicht-Drainage mit der Drainage während der frühen postoperativen Phase in Bezug auf die propriozeptive und funktionelle Erholung und die postoperativen Ergebnisse von TKA-Patienten zu vergleichen.

Material und Methoden Eine prospektive, einfach verblindete, randomisierte, kontrollierte Studie wurde an 91 TKA-Patienten durchgeführt, die nach dem Zufallsprinzip in die Nicht-Drainage-Gruppe (NDG) oder die Drainage-Gruppe (DG) eingeteilt wurden. Die Patienten wurden hinsichtlich Kniepropriozeption, funktionellen Ergebnissen, Schmerzintensität, Bewegungsumfang, Knieumfang, Anästhesiemittelverbrauch bewertet. Die Ergebnisse wurden bei der Krankenhauseinweisung, am postoperativen 7. Tag und im postoperativen 3. Monat bewertet.

Ergebnisse Zu Studienbeginn gab es keine Unterschiede zwischen den Gruppen (p > 0,05). Während der stationären Phase erlebte NDG eine überlegene Schmerzlinderung (p < 0,05), hatte einen höheren HSS-Knie-Score (HSS: Hospital for Special Surgery; p = 0,001), benötigte weniger Unterstützung beim Aufstehen (p = 0,001) und beim Gehen für 4,5 m (p = 0,034) und führten im Vergleich zur DG-Gruppe einen Time-up-and-Go-Test in einer kürzeren Dauer (p = 0,016) durch. Die NDG erreichte das aktive Anheben des gestreckten Beins früher (p = 0,009), benötigte einen geringeren Anästhetikumverbrauch (p < 0,05) und zeigte während der stationären Phase eine verbesserte Propriozeption (p < 0,05) im Vergleich zur DG.

Schlussfolgerung Unsere Ergebnisse unterstützen, dass ein Verfahren ohne Drainage eine bessere Option wäre, um eine schnellere propriozeptive und funktionelle Erholung und vorteilhafte Ergebnisse für Patienten nach TKA zu erzielen. Daher sollte das Verfahren ohne Drainage die erste Wahl bei der TKA-Operation sein und nicht die Drainage.

Keywords

proprioception - functional outcomes - drainage - non-drainage - total knee arthroplasty

Schlüsselwörter

Propriozeption - funktionelle Ergebnisse - Drainage - Non-Drainage - Knietotalendoprothetik

Publication History

Received: 18 November 2022

Accepted after revision: 07 March 2023

Article published online:
13 April 2023

• References

• 1 Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S. et al. Knee replacement. Lancet 2012; 379: 1331-1340 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60752-6. (PMID: 22398175)
• 2 Ibrahim MS, Khan MA, Nizam I. et al. Peri-operative interventions producing better functional outcomes and enhanced recovery following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an evidence-based review. BMC Med 2013; 11: 37 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-37. (PMID: 23406499)
• 3 Basilico M, Vitiello R, Liuzza F. et al. Efficacy of postoperative drainage in total knee arthroplasty: Review of the literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2020; 12 (Suppl. 01) 8663 DOI: 10.4081/or.2020.8663. (PMID: 32913598)
• 4 Li N, Liu M, Wang D. et al. Comparison of complications in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty with and without drainage. J Orthop Surg Res 2015; 10: 3 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-014-0140-1. (PMID: 25585542)
• 5 Si HB, Yang TM, Zeng Y. et al. No clear benefit or drawback to the use of closed drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17: 183 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1039-2. (PMID: 27118129)
• 6 Ovadia D, Luger E, Bickels J. et al. Efficacy of closed wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 317-321 DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90029-2. (PMID: 9113547)
• 7 Concina C, Crucil M, Fabbro S. et al. Do tourniquet and drainage influence fast track in total knee arthroplasty? Our results on 151 cases. Acta Biomed 2019; 90(1-S): 123-129 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i1-S.8080. (PMID: 30715010)
• 8 Wang D, Xu J, Zeng WN. et al. Closed Suction Drainage Is Not Associated with Faster Recovery after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of 80 Patients. Orthop Surg 2016; 8: 226-233 DOI: 10.1111/os.12247. (PMID: 27384732)
• 9 Demirkale I, Tecimel O, Sesen H. et al. Nondrainage decreases blood transfusion need and infection rate in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 993-997 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.022. (PMID: 24275263)
• 10 Yang D, Liu K, Fan L. et al. Closed suction drainage offers no more clinical benefit than non-drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty with the administration of tranexamic acid in Chinese patients. Arthroplasty 2020; 2: 18 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-020-00035-7. (PMID: 35236436)
• 11 Nishitani K, Kuriyama S, Nakamura S. et al. A Multivariate Analysis on the Effect of No Closed Suction Drain on the Length of Hospital Stay in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2019; 31: 25-30 DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.18.013. (PMID: 30871289)
• 12 Xu H, Xie J, Lei Y. et al. Closed suction drainage following routine primary total joint arthroplasty is associated with a higher transfusion rate and longer postoperative length of stay: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14: 163 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1211-0. (PMID: 31142376)
• 13 Nakahara H, Okazaki K, Mizu-Uchi H. et al. Correlations between patient satisfaction and ability to perform daily activities after total knee arthroplasty: why aren’t patients satisfied?. J Orthop Sci 2015; 20: 87-92 DOI: 10.1007/s00776-014-0671-7. (PMID: 25366699)
• 14 Labraca NS, Castro-Sanchez AM, Mataran-Penarrocha GA. et al. Benefits of starting rehabilitation within 24 hours of primary total knee arthroplasty: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25: 557-566 DOI: 10.1177/0269215510393759. (PMID: 21382863)
• 15 Van Onsem S, Verstraete M, Dhont S. et al. Improved walking distance and range of motion predict patient satisfaction after TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26: 3272-3279 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4856-z. (PMID: 29423545)
• 16 de Andrade MA, de Oliveira Campos TV, Silva BF. et al. Six month follow-up of patients submitted to total knee arthroplasty with and without placement of suction drainage devices. Rev Bras Ortop 2010; 45: 549-553 DOI: 10.1016/s2255-4971(15)30301-3. (PMID: 27026962)
• 17 Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011; 152: 2399-2404 DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005. (PMID: 21856077)
• 18 Unver B, Karatosun V, Bakirhan S. Reliability of goniometric measurements of flexion in total knee arthroplasty patients: with special reference to the body position. J Phys Ther Sci 2009; 21: 257-262 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.21.257.
• 19 Jakobsen TL, Christensen M, Christensen SS. et al. Reliability of knee joint range of motion and circumference measurements after total knee arthroplasty: does tester experience matter?. Physiother Res Int 2010; 15: 126-134 DOI: 10.1002/pri.450. (PMID: 20024893)
• 20 Narin S, Unver B, Bakirhan S. et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014; 48: 241-248 DOI: 10.3944/aott.2014.3109. (PMID: 24901911)
• 21 Shields RK, Enloe LJ, Evans RE. et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of functional tests in patients with total joint replacement. Phys Ther 1995; 75: 169-176 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/75.3.169. (PMID: 7870749)
• 22 Yuksel E, Kalkan S, Cekmece S. et al. Assessing Minimal Detectable Changes and Test-Retest Reliability of the Timed Up and Go Test and the 2-Minute Walk Test in Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 426-430 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.031. (PMID: 27639305)
• 23 Unver B, Baris RH, Yuksel E. et al. Reliability of 4-meter and 10-meter walk tests after lower extremity surgery. Disabil Rehabil 2017; 39: 2572-2576 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1236153. (PMID: 27728985)
• 24 Isaac SM, Barker KL, Danial IN. et al. Does arthroplasty type influence knee joint proprioception? A longitudinal prospective study comparing total and unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee 2007; 14: 212-217 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.01.001. (PMID: 17344047)
• 25 Kaplan FS, Nixon JE, Reitz M. et al. Age-related changes in proprioception and sensation of joint position. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56: 72-74 DOI: 10.3109/17453678508992984. (PMID: 3984706)
• 26 Gerbershagen HJ, Rothaug J, Kalkman CJ. et al. Determination of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain on the numeric rating scale: a cut-off point analysis applying four different methods. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 619-626 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer195. (PMID: 21724620)
• 27 Christodoulou AG, Ploumis AL, Terzidis IP. et al. The role of timing of tourniquet release and cementing on perioperative blood loss in total knee replacement. Knee 2004; 11: 313-317 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2003.09.005. (PMID: 15261219)
• 28 Sabatini L, Atzori F, Revello S. et al. Intravenous use of tranexamic acid reduces postoperative blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014; 134: 1609-1614 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-2081-x. (PMID: 25179896)
• 29 Carli F, Clemente A, Asenjo JF. et al. Analgesia and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty: periarticular infiltration vs continuous femoral nerve block. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 185-195 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq112. (PMID: 20551021)
• 30 Levinger P, Menz HB, Wee E. et al. Physiological risk factors for falls in people with knee osteoarthritis before and early after knee replacement surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 1082-1089 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1325-8. (PMID: 21107530)
• 31 Mahajan A. Effect of drains on dynamic proprioception after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Res Orthop 2016; 2: 404-410 DOI: 10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20164177.
• 32 Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing Proprioception: A Systematic Review of Possibilities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 933-949 DOI: 10.1177/1545968315573055. (PMID: 25712470)
• 33 Clark NC, Röijezon U, Treleaven J. Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 2: Clinical assessment and intervention. Man Ther 2015; 20: 378-387 DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.009. (PMID: 25787919)