PDF herunterladen
Int J Sports Med 2022; 43(03): 245-253
DOI: 10.1055/a-1537-9757
Training & Testing

Assessment of a Novel, 22-lead Mobile Electrocardiogram in Elite, Adolescent Footballers

Harvey Johnson 
1   Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Nuno Duarte
2   Cardiac Physiology Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Diane Ryding
3   Physiotherapy Department, Manchester United Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Dave Perry
4   Football Medicine & Science Department, Manchester United Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Steve McNally
4   Football Medicine & Science Department, Manchester United Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
A. Graham Stuart
6   Congenital Heart Unit, Bristol Heart Institute, Upper Maudlin Street, National Institute for Health Research Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Craig Anthony Williams
5   Children’s Health & Exercise Research Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
,
Guido Pieles
6   Congenital Heart Unit, Bristol Heart Institute, Upper Maudlin Street, National Institute for Health Research Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
7   Institute of Sport Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The 12-lead electrocardiogram is a key component of cardiac screening in elite adolescent footballers. Current technology hampers mobile electrocardiogram monitoring that could reduce the time-to-diagnosis in symptomatic athletes. Recently, a 22-lead mobile electrocardiogram monitor, CardioSecur (Personal MedSystems GmbH), has been approved for use in adults. In this study, the differences in parameter accuracy between CardioSecur’s 22-lead electrocardiogram and the gold standard 12-lead electrocardiogram were assessed in elite adolescent footballers (n=31) using Bland-Altman and paired t-tests/Wilcoxon analysis. Agreement between the two devices was clinically acceptable for heart rate (bias=− 0.633 bpm), PR Interval (bias=− 1.73 ms), Bazzett’s corrected QTc interval (bias=2.03 ms), T-wave axis (bias=6.55°), P-wave duration (bias=− 0.941 ms), Q-wave amplitude (bias=0.0195 mV), Q-wave duration (bias=1.98 ms), rhythm (bias=0.0333), ST-segment (bias=− 0.0629), J-point analysis (bias=− 0.01) and extended T wave and QRS duration analysis. Unsatisfactory agreement was observed in QRS axis (bias=− 19.4°), P-wave axis (bias=− 0.670°), QRS amplitude (bias=− 0.660 mV), P-wave amplitude (bias=0.0400 mV) and T-wave amplitude (bias=− 0.0675 mV). CardioSecur’s 22-lead electrocardiogram agrees with the gold standard in rhythm, durations, T-wave determination in all leads assessed, permitting its use in adolescent footballers for immediate pitch- or track-side analysis.

Key words

mobile electrocardiogram - vectorcardiography - pre-participation screening - 22-lead ECG - cardiac adaptation - EASI ECG

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. Oktober 2020

Angenommen: 14. Juni 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Henriksen EE. An echocardiographic study of right and left ventricular adaptation to physical exercise in elite female orienteers. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 309-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Zaidi Abbas A. Physiological right ventricular adaptation in elite athletes of African and Afro-Caribbean origin. Circulation 2013; 127: 1783-1792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 D’Ascenzi Flavio F. Morphological and functional adaptation of left and right atria induced by training in highly trained female athletes. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 222-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Baggish AL, Wood MJ. Athlete’s heart and cardiovascular care of the athlete: scientific and clinical update. Circulation 2011; 123: 2723-2735
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sharma S, Drezner JA, Baggish A. et al International Recommendations for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69: 1057-1075
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Aagaard Philip P. Early repolarization in athletes: A review. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2016; 9: e003577
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Drezner JA, Fischbach P, Froelicher V. et al Normal electrocardiographic findings: Recognising physiological adaptations in athletes. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 125-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Prior DL, La Gerche A. The athlete’s heart. Heart 2012; 98: 947-955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 McClean G, Riding NR, Ardern CL. et al Electrical and structural adaptations of the paediatric athlete’s heart: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Borjesson MM. Incidence and aetiology of sudden cardiac death in young athletes: an international perspective. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 644-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Corrado Domenico D. Does sports activity enhance the risk of sudden death in adolescents and young adults?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1959-1963
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Malhotra A, Dhutia H, Finocchiaro G. et al Outcomes of cardiac screening in adolescent soccer players. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 524-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tomkinson GR, Carver KD, Atkinson F. et al European normative values for physical fitness in children and adolescents aged 9–17 years: results from 2 779 165 Eurofit performances representing 30 countries. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 1445-14563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rudiger A, Hellermann JP, Mukherjee R. et al Electrocardiographic artifacts due to electrode misplacement and their frequency in different clinical settings. Am J Emerg Med 2007; 25: 174-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Harrigan RA, Chan TC, Brady WJ. Electrocardiographic electrode misplacement, misconnection, and artifact. J Emerg Med 2012; 43: 1038-1044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bonaventura K, Wellnhofer E, Fleck E. Comparison of standard and derived 12-lead electrocardiograms registrated by a simplified 3-lead setting with four electrodes for diagnosis of coronary angioplasty-induced myocardial ischaemia. European Cardiology 2012; 8: 179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dower GEG. Deriving the 12-lead electrocardiogram from four (EASI) electrodes. J Electrocardiol 1988; 21: 182-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Drew BJ, Adams MG, Pelter MM. et al Comparison of standard and derived 12-lead electrocardiograms for diagnosis of coronary angioplasty-induced myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 639-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Drew BJ, Scheinman MM, Evans GT. Comparison of a vectorcardiographically derived 12-lead electrocardiogram with the conventional electrocardiogram during wide QRS complex tachycardia, and its potential application for continuous bedside monitoring. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 612-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Drew BJ. Accuracy of the EASI 12-lead electrocardiogram compared to the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram for diagnosing multiple cardiac abnormalities. J Electrocardiol 1999; 32: 38-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sejersten M, Wagner GS, Pahlm O. et al Detection of acute ischemia from the EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram and from the 12-lead electrocardiogram acquired in clinical practice. J Electrocardiol 2007; 40: 120-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chantad D, Krittayaphong R, Komoltri C. Derived 12-lead electrocardiogram in the assessment of ST-segment deviation and cardiac rhythm. J Electrocardiol 2006; 39: 7-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lancia L, Toccaceli A, Petrucci C. et al Continuous ECG monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndrome or heart failure: EASI versus gold standard. Clin Nurs Res 2017; 27: 433-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lancia L, Pisegna Cerone M, Vittorini P. et al A comparison between EASI system 12-lead ECGs and standard 12-lead ECGs for improved clinical nursing practice. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 370-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Somers MP, Brady WJ, Bateman DC. et al Additional electrocardiographic leads in the ED chest pain patient: right ventricular and posterior leads. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 21: 563-573
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Matetzky S, Freimark D, Feinberg MS. et al Acute myocardial infarction with isolated ST-segment elevation in posterior chest leads V7-9: “hidden” ST-segment elevations revealing acute posterior infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 748-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kern H, Stiepak J, Popp E. et al First real-world experience with CardioSecur in the preclinical setting; When time does matter. Resuscitation 2017; 118: e91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Justis DL, Hession WT. Accuracy of 22-lead ECG analysis for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease in the emergency department: A comparison with 12-lead ECG. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kenedi P, Préda I, Thuer J. et al Effect of body position on a mobile, vector-derived, 12-lead electrocardiogram. EC Cardiology 2018; 5: 589-595
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Harriss DJ, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Frank E. An accurate, clinically practical system for spatial vectorcardiography. Circulation 1956; 13: 737-749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Drezner JA, Ackerman MJ, Cannon BC. et al Abnormal electrocardiographic findings in athletes: recognising changes suggestive of primary electrical disease. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 153-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Schnell F, Behar N, Carré F. Long-QT syndrome and competitive sports. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev 2018; 7: 187-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327: 307-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Triebl D KP, Predas I, Szekely A. et al Comparative study of the CardioSecur Pro ECG system with the EASI Philips M2601B. Abstract presented: eCardiology Congress, Berlin. : 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Corrado D, Drezner JA, D’Ascenzi F. et al How to evaluate premature ventricular beats in the athlete: critical review and proposal of a diagnostic algorithm. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54: 1142-1148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Spaich S, Kern H, Zelniker TA. et al Feasibility of cardiosecur, a mobile 4-electrode/22-lead ECG device, in the prehospital emergency setting. Front Cardiovasc Med 2020; 7: 551796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar