Download PDF
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2020; 52(01): 11-17
DOI: 10.1055/a-1076-0814
Originalarbeit

An analysis of patient’s and disease related factors predictive of the outcomes of surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome

Welche patienten- und krankheitsbezogenen Faktoren haben für das Ergebnis nach Karpaltunneloperation Relevanz?
Andrzej Zyluk
1   Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Department of General and Hand Surgery
,
Paulina Zyluk-Gadowska
1   Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Department of General and Hand Surgery
,
Lukasz Kolodziej
2   Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology
,
Zbigniew Szlosser
1   Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Department of General and Hand Surgery
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose Outcomes of surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome may differ in relation to certain factors like age, duration of symptoms, clinical and electrophysiological severity. The objective of this study was an investigation into the hypothesis that several factors are predictive of results of surgical treatment of the condition.

Methods The pre- and postoperative records of 1,117 patients: 909 women (81 %) and 208 men (19 %) with a mean age of 63 years were analysed. Outcomes recorded in the sensory and functional severity scores of the Levine questionnaire were dichotomized into achieving or not-achieving a minimally clinically important difference. The effect of selected variables: sex, age, duration of symptoms, clinical and electrophysiological severity of and presence of comorbidities on outcomes of surgery at 6 months was investigated.

Results Univariate and multivariate analysis of covariates based on sex, age, duration of the disease and its clinical severity showed female gender and worse baseline symptom severity scores to be significant predictors for an improvement following carpal tunnel syndrome surgery. It showed also younger age, shorter duration of symptoms and higher baseline symptom severity scores to be predictive of a greater improvement of total grip strength, and younger age to be predictive of a greater pain cessation following surgery.

Conclusion Of all considered patient’s and disease related factors, the baseline clinical severity expressed in the Levine symptom severity scores had appeared to be the strongest predictor of better outcomes of surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Das Ergebnis nach Operation eines Karpaltunnelsyndroms (KTS) mag abhängig vom Alter des Patienten, der Dauer der Beschwerden sowie dem klinischen und elektrophysiologischen Schweregrad unterschiedlich ausfallen. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die Hypothese, dass mehrere Faktoren eine Vorhersage des zu erwartenden Ergebnisses nach KTS-Operation erlauben.

Patienten und Methoden Die Krankenakten von 1.117 Patienten (999 Frauen = 81 % und 208 Männern = 19 % mit einem Durchschnittsalter von 63 Jahren) wurden ausgewertet. Untersuchte Faktoren waren Geschlecht, Alter, Dauer der Beschwerden, klinischer und elektrophysiologischer Schweregrad und das Vorhandensein von Begleiterkrankungen. Als Kriterium, ob ein Faktor als vorhersagerelevant eingestuft wurde oder nicht, diente das Erreichen bzw. Nicht-Erreichen eines minimal klinisch bedeutenden Unterschiedes im sensiblen und funktionellen Livine questionair 6 Monate postoperativ.

Ergebnisse Weibliches Geschlecht und schlechte Ausgangsdaten konnten als aussagekräftige Vorhersageparameter puncto Verbesserung nach KTS-Operation identifiziert werden. Jüngeres Alter, kürzere Beschwerdedauer und schlechtere Ausgangsdaten lassen eine stärkere Zunahme der Griffkraft erwarten; jüngeres Alter auch eine stärkere Schmerzreduktion.

Schlussfolgerung Von allen untersuchten patienten- und krankheitsbezogenen Parametern scheint der klinische Schweregrad, ermittelt durch den Levine symptom severity score, der aussagekräftigste Vorhersageparameter bzgl. einer Verbesserung nach KTS-Operation.

Schlüsselwörter

Karpaltunnelsyndrom - Pathologie - Vorhersageparameter für das Ergebnis

Key words

Carpal tunnel syndrome - outcomes of surgery - prediction of outcomes


Publication History

Received: 20 April 2019

Accepted: 09 November 2019

Article published online:
05 March 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • References

  • 1 Porter P, Venkasteswaran B, Stephenson U. et al. The influence of age on outcome after operations for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84: 688-691
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hobby JL, Venkatesh R, Motukr P. The effect of age and gender upon symptoms and surgical outcomes in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30: 599-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Edgell SE, McCabe SJ, Breidenbach WC. et al. Predicting the outcome of carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28: 255-261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Townshend DN, Taylor P, Gwynne-Jones DP. The outcome of carpal tunnel decompression in elderly patients. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30: 500-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tan JS, Tan AB. Outcomes of open carpal tunnel releases and its predictors: a prospective study. Hand Surg 2012; 17: 341-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bowman A, Rudolfer S, Weller P. et al. A prognostic model for the patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2018; 58: 784-789
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Watchmacher JD, Watchmacher GP. Independent variables affecting outcome of carpal tunnel surgery. Hand (NY) 2018; 13: 285-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Katz JN, Losina E, Amick BC. et al. Predictors of outcomes of carpal tunnel release. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 1184-1193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ. et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 1585-1592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rodrigues JN, Mabvuure NT, Nikkhah D. et al. Minimal important changes and differences in elective hand surgery. J Hand Surg Eur 2015; 40: 900-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ibrahim T, Majid D, Clarke M. et al. Outcome of carpal tunnel decompression: the influence of age, gender and occupation. Int Orthop 2009; 33: 1305-1309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fung BW, Tang CY, Fung BK. Does aging matter? The efficacy of carpal tunnel release in the elderly. Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42: 278-281
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wilgis EF, Burke FD, Dubin NH. et al. A prospective assessment of carpal tunnel surgery with respect to age. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31: 401-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Choi SJ, Ahn DS. Correlation of clinical history and electrodiagnostic abnormalities with outcome after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 2374-2379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Burke FD, Wiligs S, Dubin NH. et al. Relationship between the duration and severity of symptoms and the outcome of carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 1478-1482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yucel H. Factors affecting symptoms and functionality of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a retrospective study. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27: 1097-1101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zyluk A, Strychar J. A comparison of two limited open techniques for carpal tunnel syndrome release. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31: 466-472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Luchetti R, Schoenhuber R, Landi A. Assessment of sensory nerve conduction in carpal tunnel syndrome before, during and after operation. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13: 386-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Turner A, Kimble F, Gulyas A. et al. Can the outcome of open carpal tunnel release be predicted. ANZ J Surg 2010; 80: 50-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Capasso M, Manzoli C, Uncini A. Management of extreme carpal tunnel syndrome: evidence form a long-term follow-up study. Muscle Nerve 2009; 40: 86-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kitsis CK, Sazzidon O, Alam A. et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome despite negative neurophysiological studies. Acta Orthop Belg 2002; 68: 135-140
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mondelli M, Reale F, Padua R. et al. Clinical and neurophysiological outcome of surgery in extreme carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 1237-1242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Braun RM, Jackson WJ. Electrical studies as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19: 893-899
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Witt JC, Hentz JG, Clarke Stevens J. Carpal tunnel syndrome with normal nerve conduction studies. Muscle Nerve 2004; 29: 515-522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Concannon MJ, Gainor B, Petroski GF. et al. The predictive value of electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100: 1452-1458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bland JD. Do nerve conduction studies predict the outcome of carpal tunnel decompression?. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 935-940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Longstaff L, Milner LH, O’Sullivan S. et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: the correlation between outcome, symptoms and NCS findings. J Hand Surg Br 2001; 26: 475-480
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mondelli M, Padua L, Reale F. et al. Outcome of surgical release among diabetics with carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 7-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Thomsen NO, Cederlund R, Rosen I. et al. Clinical outcomes of surgical release among diabetic patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: prospective follow-up with matched controls. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34: 1177-1187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Zyluk A, Zyluk-Gadowska P. Factors affecting the outcomes of carpal-tunnel surgery: a review. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2016; 48: 260-265
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Cagle PJ, Reams M, Agel J. et al. An outcomes protocol for carpal tunnel release: a comparison of outcomes in patients with and without medical comorbidities. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39: 2175-2180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar