Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.149635
Biocompatibility of a new epoxy resin-based root canal sealer in subcutaneous tissue of rat
Publication History
Publication Date:
04 September 2019 (online)
ABSTRACT
Objective: The objective was to evaluate the subcutaneous biocompatibility of two root canal sealers. Materials and Methods: Thirty female rats were distributed into two groups of 15 animals. Each received subcutaneous dorsal implants: Silicone tubes filled with AH Plus or Obtuseal. After the 11th, 14th, and 45th days, tissues were collected for biopsy and fixed and processed for histologic evaluation. Observations of the cellular inflammatory components, such as lymphocytes and macrophages, were made. The data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Connover tests (P < 0.05). Results: By the 7th day, lymphocyte infiltration increased in both groups (P = 0.0104). However, macrophage infiltration increased only in the AH Plus group (P = 0.0011). By the 14th and 45th days, lymphocyte and macrophage infiltrations were reduced. At the end of the experimental period, no statistically significant differences were found between the AH Plus group and the Obtuseal group (P > 0.05). Conclusion: After 45 days, Obtuseal yielded a satisfactory tissue reaction; it was biocompatible when tested in subcutaneous rat tissue. On the basis of the obtained results, it was concluded that Obtuseal root canal sealer caused a satisfactory tissue reaction as AH plus, because it was biocompatible when tested in the subcutaneous tissue of rats.
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Miletic I, Devcic N, Anic I, Borcic J, Karlovic Z, Osmak M. The cytotoxicity of RoekoSeal and AH plus compared during different setting periods. J Endod 2005; 31: 307-9
- 2 Ricucci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J 1998; 31: 394-409
- 3 Ricucci D. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Literature review. Int Endod J 1998; 31: 384-93
- 4 Kaplan AE, Ormaechea MF, Picca M, Canzobre MC, Ubios AM. Rheological properties and biocompatibility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 527-32
- 5 Hauman CH, Love RM. Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: A review. Part 2. Root-canal-filling materials. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 147-60
- 6 Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 203-9
- 7 Giovanini AF, Leonardi DP, Baratto-Filho F, Vlença PC, Moresca RC, Moro A. et al. An endodontic sealer induces a pathological condition when associated with persistent tissue toxicity and presence of myofibroblasts. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 369-76
- 8 de Oliveira MendesST, Ribeiro SobrinhoAP, de Carvalho AT, de Souza CôrtesMI, Vieira LQ. In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of two root canal sealers on macrophage activity. J Endod 2003; 29: 95-9
- 9 Kettering JD, Torabinejad M. Cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: A study using HeLa cells and fibroblasts. Int Endod J 1984; 17: 60-6
- 10 Silveira CM, Pinto SC, Zedebski RdeA, Santos FA, Pilatti GL. Biocompatibility of four root canal sealers: A histopathological evaluation in rat subcutaneous connective tissue. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 21-7
- 11 Economides N, Kotsaki-Kovatsi VP, Poulopoulos A, Kolokuris I, Rozos G, Shore R. Experimental study of the biocompatibility of four root canal sealers and their influence on the zinc and calcium content of several tissues. J Endod 1995; 21: 122-7
- 12 Batista RF, Hidalgo MM, Hernandes L, Consolaro A, Velloso TR, Cuman RK. et al. Microscopic analysis of subcutaneous reactions to endodontic sealer implants in rats. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007; 81: 171-7
- 13 Scarparo RK, Grecca FS, Fachin EV. Analysis of tissue reactions to methacrylate resin-based, epoxy resin-based, and zinc oxide-eugenol endodontic sealers. J Endod 2009; 35: 229-32
- 14 Sousa CJ, Montes CR, Pascon EA, Loyola AM, Versiani MA. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of AH Plus, EndoREZ, and Epiphany root canal sealers. J Endod 2006; 32: 656-62
- 15 Azar NG, Heidari M, Bahrami ZS, Shokri F. In vitro cytotoxicity of a new epoxy resin root canal sealer. J Endod 2000; 26: 462-5
- 16 Mori GG, de Moraes IG, Nunes DC, Castilho LR, Poi WR, Capaldi ML. Biocompatibility evaluation of alendronate paste in rat's subcutaneous tissue. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25: 209-12
- 17 Huang FM, Tsai CH, Yang SF, Chang YC. Induction of interleukin-6 and interleukin-gene expression by root canal sealers in human osteoblastic cells. J Endod 2005; 31: 679-83
- 18 Farhad AR, Hasheminia S, Razavi S, Feizi M. Histopathologic evaluation of subcutaneous tissue response to three endodontic sealers in rats. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 15-21
- 19 Torneck CD. Reaction of rat connective tissue to polyethylene tube implants. I. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 21: 379-87
- 20 Berbert FL, Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Tanomaru FilhoM, Bramante CM. Influence of root canal dressings and sealers on repair of apical periodontitis after endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 184-9
- 21 Huang FM, Tai KW, Chou MY, Chang YC. Cytotoxicity of resin-, zinc oxide-eugenol-, and calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells and permanent V79 cells. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 153-8
- 22 de Oliveira RL, Oliveira FilhoRS, Gomes HdeC, de Franco MF, Enokihara MM, Duarte MA. Influence of calcium hydroxide addition to AH Plus sealer on its biocompatibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e50-4
- 23 Estrela C, Sydney GB, Bammann LL, Felippe JúniorO. Mechanism of action of calcium and hydroxyl ions of calcium hydroxide on tissue and bacteria. Braz Dent J 1995; 6: 85-90
- 24 Tagger M, Tagger E, Kfir A. Release of calcium and hydroxyl ions from set endodontic sealers containing calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1988; 14: 588-91
- 25 Gomes-Filho JE, Bernabé PF, Nery MJ, Otoboni-Filho JA, Dezan-Júnior E, de Moraes CostaMM. et al. Reaction of rat connective tissue to a new calcium hydroxide-based sealer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: e71-6
- 26 de Campos-Pinto MM, de Oliveira DA, Versiani MA, Silva-Sousa YT, de Sousa-Neto MD, da Cruz PerezDE. Assessment of the biocompatibility of Epiphany root canal sealer in rat subcutaneous tissues. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: e77-81
- 27 Hauman CH, Love RM. Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: A review. Part 1. Intracanal drugs and substances. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 75-85
Correspondence:
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Miletic I, Devcic N, Anic I, Borcic J, Karlovic Z, Osmak M. The cytotoxicity of RoekoSeal and AH plus compared during different setting periods. J Endod 2005; 31: 307-9
- 2 Ricucci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J 1998; 31: 394-409
- 3 Ricucci D. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Literature review. Int Endod J 1998; 31: 384-93
- 4 Kaplan AE, Ormaechea MF, Picca M, Canzobre MC, Ubios AM. Rheological properties and biocompatibility of endodontic sealers. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 527-32
- 5 Hauman CH, Love RM. Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: A review. Part 2. Root-canal-filling materials. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 147-60
- 6 Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 203-9
- 7 Giovanini AF, Leonardi DP, Baratto-Filho F, Vlença PC, Moresca RC, Moro A. et al. An endodontic sealer induces a pathological condition when associated with persistent tissue toxicity and presence of myofibroblasts. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 369-76
- 8 de Oliveira MendesST, Ribeiro SobrinhoAP, de Carvalho AT, de Souza CôrtesMI, Vieira LQ. In vitro evaluation of the cytotoxicity of two root canal sealers on macrophage activity. J Endod 2003; 29: 95-9
- 9 Kettering JD, Torabinejad M. Cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: A study using HeLa cells and fibroblasts. Int Endod J 1984; 17: 60-6
- 10 Silveira CM, Pinto SC, Zedebski RdeA, Santos FA, Pilatti GL. Biocompatibility of four root canal sealers: A histopathological evaluation in rat subcutaneous connective tissue. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 21-7
- 11 Economides N, Kotsaki-Kovatsi VP, Poulopoulos A, Kolokuris I, Rozos G, Shore R. Experimental study of the biocompatibility of four root canal sealers and their influence on the zinc and calcium content of several tissues. J Endod 1995; 21: 122-7
- 12 Batista RF, Hidalgo MM, Hernandes L, Consolaro A, Velloso TR, Cuman RK. et al. Microscopic analysis of subcutaneous reactions to endodontic sealer implants in rats. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007; 81: 171-7
- 13 Scarparo RK, Grecca FS, Fachin EV. Analysis of tissue reactions to methacrylate resin-based, epoxy resin-based, and zinc oxide-eugenol endodontic sealers. J Endod 2009; 35: 229-32
- 14 Sousa CJ, Montes CR, Pascon EA, Loyola AM, Versiani MA. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of AH Plus, EndoREZ, and Epiphany root canal sealers. J Endod 2006; 32: 656-62
- 15 Azar NG, Heidari M, Bahrami ZS, Shokri F. In vitro cytotoxicity of a new epoxy resin root canal sealer. J Endod 2000; 26: 462-5
- 16 Mori GG, de Moraes IG, Nunes DC, Castilho LR, Poi WR, Capaldi ML. Biocompatibility evaluation of alendronate paste in rat's subcutaneous tissue. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25: 209-12
- 17 Huang FM, Tsai CH, Yang SF, Chang YC. Induction of interleukin-6 and interleukin-gene expression by root canal sealers in human osteoblastic cells. J Endod 2005; 31: 679-83
- 18 Farhad AR, Hasheminia S, Razavi S, Feizi M. Histopathologic evaluation of subcutaneous tissue response to three endodontic sealers in rats. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 15-21
- 19 Torneck CD. Reaction of rat connective tissue to polyethylene tube implants. I. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 21: 379-87
- 20 Berbert FL, Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Tanomaru FilhoM, Bramante CM. Influence of root canal dressings and sealers on repair of apical periodontitis after endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 184-9
- 21 Huang FM, Tai KW, Chou MY, Chang YC. Cytotoxicity of resin-, zinc oxide-eugenol-, and calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells and permanent V79 cells. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 153-8
- 22 de Oliveira RL, Oliveira FilhoRS, Gomes HdeC, de Franco MF, Enokihara MM, Duarte MA. Influence of calcium hydroxide addition to AH Plus sealer on its biocompatibility. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: e50-4
- 23 Estrela C, Sydney GB, Bammann LL, Felippe JúniorO. Mechanism of action of calcium and hydroxyl ions of calcium hydroxide on tissue and bacteria. Braz Dent J 1995; 6: 85-90
- 24 Tagger M, Tagger E, Kfir A. Release of calcium and hydroxyl ions from set endodontic sealers containing calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1988; 14: 588-91
- 25 Gomes-Filho JE, Bernabé PF, Nery MJ, Otoboni-Filho JA, Dezan-Júnior E, de Moraes CostaMM. et al. Reaction of rat connective tissue to a new calcium hydroxide-based sealer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: e71-6
- 26 de Campos-Pinto MM, de Oliveira DA, Versiani MA, Silva-Sousa YT, de Sousa-Neto MD, da Cruz PerezDE. Assessment of the biocompatibility of Epiphany root canal sealer in rat subcutaneous tissues. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: e77-81
- 27 Hauman CH, Love RM. Biocompatibility of dental materials used in contemporary endodontic therapy: A review. Part 1. Intracanal drugs and substances. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 75-85