Early acetabular cartilage wear following hemiarthroplasty: An ovine model

Summary

Objectives: Hemiarthroplasty induces degenerative changes in the hip joint, which are difficult to evaluate in vivo. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a radiographic measurement technique that has recently been used to measure acetabular cartilage wear in vivo. The aim of the study was to measure acetabular cartilage wear, using this technique, in an ovine model during the first 14 weeks post-implantation.

Methods: Measurements of three-dimensional femoral head migration, combined with visual assessments at necropsy and safranin O staining for cartilage integrity, were undertaken.

Results: Mean femoral head migration during the first six weeks was 0.525 mm in the medial, 0.144 mm in the cranial, and 0.517 mm in the dorsal direction. The majority of this migration was confirmed to be cartilage wear in the medial and dorsal aspects of the acetabulum at necropsy and with subsequent histological evaluation depicting significant cartilage degeneration.

Clinical significance: Radiostereometric analysis is the current gold standard technique for in vivo assessment of implant migration following total hip replacement. This study has utilized RSA to quantify the amount of early cartilage wear in vivo, which was supported by ex vivo evaluations. Accurately measuring the amount of cartilage wear will allow future studies to compare component material and design characteristics prior to clinical use.

Keywords

Hemiarthroplasty - acetabular cartilage - radiostereometric analysis - cartilage wear

• References

• 1 Kenzora JE, Magaziner J, Hudson J. et al. Outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 348: 51-58.
• 2 Crossman PT, Khan RJ, MacDowell A. et al. A survey of the treatment of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the UK. Injury 2002; 33: 383-386.
• 3 Iorio R, Schwartz B, Macaulay W. et al. Surgical treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 1124-1133.
• 4 Dalldorf PG, Banas MP, Hicks DG. et al. Rates of degeneration of human acetabular cartilage after hemiarthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995; 77: 877-882.
• 5 McGibbon CA, Krebs DE, Trahan CA. et al. Cartilage degeneration in relation to repetitive pressure: Case study of a unilateral hip hemiarthroplasty patient. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 52-58.
• 6 Minihane KP, Turner TM, Urban RM. et al. Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty on articular cartilage and bone in a canine model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 437: 157-163.
• 7 Van der Meulen MC, Beaupré GS, Smith RL. et al. Factors influencing changes in articular cartilage following hemiarthroplasty in sheep. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 669-675.
• 8 Figved W, Dahl J, Snorrason F. et al. Radiostereometric analysis of hemiarthroplasties of the hip - a highly precise method for measurements of cartilage wear. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012; 20: 36-42.
• 9 Moon KH, Kang JS, Lee TJ. et al. Degeneration of acetabular articular cartilage to bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Yonsei Med J 2008; 49: 719-724.
• 10 Cruess RL, Kwok DC, Duc PN. et al. The response of articular cartilage to weight-bearing against metal. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1984; 66-B: 592-597.
• 11 Cook SD, Thomas KA, Kester MA. Wear characteristics of the canine acetabulum against different femoral prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1989; 71-B: 189-197.
• 12 Brumby SA, Howie DW, Pearcy MJ. et al. Radiographic and histologic analysis of cemented double tapered femoral stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 355: 229-237.
• 13 Wachtl SW, Jakob RP, Gautier E. Ten-year patient and prosthesis survival after unipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in female patients over 70 years old. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 587-591.
• 14 Field JR, Stanley R, Appleyard R. et al. An evaluation of prosthetic femoral head impact on acetabular articular cartilage in a hemiarthroplasty model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 142-147.
• 15 Jeffcote B, Li MG, Barnet-Moorcroft A. et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis and clinical assessment of unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for subcapital femur fracture: a randomized prospective study. ANZ J Surg 2010; 80: 242-246.
• 16 Howie DW, McGee MA, Callary SA. et al. A pre-clinical study of stem subsidence and graft incorporation after femoral impaction grafting using porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft extender. J Arthoplasty 2011; 26: 1050-1056.
• 17 Pearle AD, Warren RF, Rodeo SA. Basic science of articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Clin Sports Med 2005; 24: 1-12.
• 18 Valstar ER, Spoor CW, Nelissen RG. et al. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of metal-backed hemispherical cups without markers attached. J Orthop Res 1997; 15: 869-873.
• 19 Bragdon CR, Malchau H, Yuan X. et al. Experimental assessment of precision and accuracy for the determination of polyethylene wear in a total hip replacement model. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 688-695.
• 20 Börlin N, Röhrl SM, Bragdon CR. RSA wear measurements with or without markers in total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech 2006; 39: 1641-1650.
• 21 Kärrholm J, Gill RH, Valstar ER. The history and future of radiostereometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 448: 10-21.
• 22 Kärrholm J. Radiostereometric analysis of early implant migration - a valuable tool to ensure proper introduction of new implants. Acta Orthop 2012; 83: 551-552.