Atherosclerosis at arterial bifurcations: evidence for the role of haemodynamics and geometry

Summary

Atherosclerotic plaques are found at distinct locations in the arterial system, despite the exposure to systemic risk factors of the entire vascular tree. From the study of arterial bifurcation regions, emerges ample evidence that haemodynamics are involved in the local onset and progression of the atherosclerotic disease. This observed co-localisation of disturbed flow regions and lesion prevalence at geometrically predisposed districts such as arterial bifurcations has led to the formulation of a ‘haemodynamic hypothesis’, that in this review is grounded to the most current research concerning localising factors of vascular disease. In particular, this review focuses on carotid and coronary bifurcations because of their primary relevance to stroke and heart attack. We highlight reported relationships between atherosclerotic plaque location, progression and composition, and fluid forces at vessel’s wall, in particular shear stress and its ‘easier-tomeasure’ surrogates, i.e. vascular geometric attributes (because geometry shapes the flow) and intravascular flow features (because they mediate disturbed shear stress), in order to give more insight in plaque initiation and destabilisation. Analogous to Virchow’s triad for thrombosis, atherosclerosis must be thought of as subject to a triad of, and especially interactions among, haemodynamic forces, systemic risk factors, and the biological response of the wall.

Keywords

Atherosclerosis - biomechanics - shear stress - arterial bifurcation - haemodynamics

• References

• 1 Ylä-Herttuala S. et al. Stabilisation of atherosclerotic plaques. Position paper of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on atherosclerosis and vascular biology. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 1-19.
• 2 Libby P. et al. Immune effector mechanisms implicated in atherosclerosis: from mice to humans. Immunity 2013; 38: 1092-1104.
• 3 Van Vre EA. et al. Apoptotic Cell Death and Efferocytosis in Atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012; 32: 887-893.
• 4 Asakura T, Karino T. Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ Res 1990; 66: 1045-1066.
• 5 Eshtehardi P. et al. Association of coronary wall shear stress with atherosclerotic plaque burden, composition, and distribution in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2012; 1: e002543.
• 6 Kwak BR. et al. Biomechanical factors in atherosclerosis: mechanisms and clinical implications. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 3013-3020.
• 7 Malek AM. et al. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 282: 2035-2042.
• 8 Glagov S. et al. Hemodynamics and atherosclerosis. Insights and perspectives gained from studies of human arteries. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1988; 112: 1018-1031.
• 9 Zarins CK. et al. Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. Quantitative correlation of plaque localisation with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress. Circ Res 1983; 53: 502-514.
• 10 Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 1985; 5: 293-302.
• 11 Taylor CA, Steinman DA. Image-based modeling of blood flow and vessel wall dynamics: applications, methods and future directions: Sixth International Bio-Fluid Mechanics Symposium and Workshop, March 28-30, 2008 Pasadena, California. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 1188-1203.
• 12 Cibis M. et al. Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries. NMR Biomed 2014; 27: 826-834.
• 13 Friedman MH. et al. Arterial geometry affects hemodynamics. A potential risk factor for athersoclerosis. Atherosclerosis 1983; 46: 225-231.
• 14 Lee S-W. et al. Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow. Stroke 2008; 39: 2341-2347.
• 15 Thomas JB. et al. Variation in the carotid bifurcation geometry of young versus older adults: implications for geometric risk of atherosclerosis. Stroke 2005; 36: 2450-2456.
• 16 Perktold K, Resch M. Numerical flow studies in human carotid artery bifurcations. J Biomed Eng 1990; 12: 111-123.
• 17 Perktold K. et al. Pulsatile non-Newtonian blood flow in three-dimensional carotid bifurcation models: a numerical study of flow phenomena under different bifurcation angles. J Biomed Eng 1991; 13: 507-515.
• 18 Bijari PB. et al. Carotid bifurcation geometry is an independent predictor of early wall thickening at the carotid bulb. Stroke 2014; 45: 473-478.
• 19 Caro CG. et al. Non-planar curvature and branching of arteries and non-planar-type flow. Proc R Soc Lond A 1996; 452: 185-197.
• 20 Morbiducci U. et al. Helical flow as fluid dynamic signature for atherogenesis in aortocoronary bypass. A numeric study. J Biomech 2007; 40: 519-534.
• 21 Gallo D. et al. Helical flow in carotid bifurcation as surrogate marker of exposure to disturbed shear. J Biomech 2012; 45: 2398-2404.
• 22 Félétou M. et al. Nitric oxide: Orchestrator of endothelium-dependent responses. Ann Med 2012; 44: 694-716.
• 23 Weber C. et al. The role of junctional adhesion molecules in vascular inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7: 467-477.
• 24 Zarbock A, Ley K. Mechanisms and consequences of neutrophil interaction with the endothelium. Am J Pathol 2008; 172: 1-7.
• 25 Ando J, Yamamoto K. Flow detection and calcium signalling in vascular en-dothelial cells. Cardiovasc Res 2013; 99: 260-268.
• 26 Boon RA, Horrevoets AJG. Key transcriptional regulators of the vasoprotective effects of shear stress. Hamostaseologie 2009; 29: 39-43.
• 27 Davies PF. et al. The atherosusceptible endothelium: Endothelial phenotypes in complex haemodynamic shear stress regions in vivo. Cardiovasc Res 2013; 99: 315-327.
• 28 Schober A. et al. MicroRNA-mediated mechanisms of the cellular stress response in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015; 12: 361-374.
• 29 Ylä-Herttuala S. et al. Stabilisation of atherosclerotic plaques: An update. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 3251-3258.
• 30 Cheng C. et al. Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 2006; 113: 2744-2753.
• 31 Glagov S. et al. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1371-1375.
• 32 Chatzizisis YS. et al. Prediction of the localisation of high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the basis of low endothelial shear stress: an intravascular ultrasound and histopathology natural history study. Circulation 2008; 117: 993-1002.
• 33 Dirksen MT. et al. Distribution of inflammatory cells in atherosclerotic plaques relates to the direction of flow. Circulation 1998; 98: 2000-2003.
• 34 Cicha I. et al. Carotid plaque vulnerability: A positive feedback between he-modynamic and biochemical mechanisms. Stroke 2011; 42: 3502-3510.
• 35 Slager CJ. et al. The role of shear stress in the destabilisation of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005; 2: 456-464.
• 36 Death AK. et al. Nitroglycerin upregulates matrix metalloproteinase expression by human macrophages. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1943-1950.
• 37 Kenagy RD. et al. Increased plasmin and serine proteinase activity during flow-induced intimal atrophy in baboon PTFE grafts. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002; 22: 400-404.
• 38 Lijnen HR. Plasmin and matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 324-333.
• 39 Tang D. et al. Quantifying effects of plaque structure and material properties on stress distributions in human atherosclerotic plaques using 3D FSI models. J Biomech Eng 2005; 127: 1185-1194.
• 40 Tang D. et al. A negative correlation between human carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression and plaque wall stress: in vivo MRI-based 2D/3D FSI models. J Biomech 2008; 41: 727-736.
• 41 Tang D. et al. Image-based modeling for better understanding and assessment of atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability: data, modeling, validation, uncertainty and predictions. J Biomech 2014; 47: 834-846.
• 42 Bressloff NW. Parametric geometry exploration of the human carotid artery bifurcation. J Biomech 2007; 40: 2483-2491.
• 43 Thomas JB. et al. On the influence of vessel planarity on local hemodynamics at the human carotid bifurcation. Biorheology 2002; 39: 443-448.
• 44 Markl M. et al. In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery: effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalisation therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 647-655.
• 45 Zhang Q. et al. Use of factor analysis to characterize arterial geometry and predict hemodynamic risk: application to the human carotid bifurcation. J Bio-mech Eng 2010; 132: 114505.
• 46 Bijari PB. et al. Improved prediction of disturbed flow via hemodynamically-in-spired geometric variables. J Biomech 2012; 45: 1632-1637.
• 47 Ku DN, Giddens DP. Pulsatile flow in a model carotid bifurcation. Arteriosclerosis 1983; 3: 31-39.
• 48 Goubergrits L. et al. Atherosclerosis and flow in carotid arteries with authentic geometries. Biorheology 2002; 39: 519-524.
• 49 Schulz UGR, Rothwell PM. Association between arterial bifurcation anatomy and angiographic plaque ulceration among 4,627 carotid stenoses. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 15: 244-251.
• 50 Lovett JK, Rothwell PM. Site of carotid plaque ulceration in relation to direction of blood flow: an angiographic and pathological study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 16: 369-375.
• 51 De Weert TT. et al. Atherosclerotic plaque surface morphology in the carotid bifurcation assessed with multidetector computed tomography angiography. Stroke 2009; 40: 1334-1340.
• 52 Groen HC. et al. Plaque rupture in the carotid artery is localized at the high shear stress region: a case report. Stroke 2007; 38: 2379-2381.
• 53 Raso AM. et al. Geometry of aortoiliac bifurcation in healthy men and women as possible atherogenic risk factor. Panminerva Med 1981; 23: 33-37.
• 54 Harrison MJG, Marshall J. Does the geometry of the carotid bifurcation affect its predisposition to atheroma?. Stroke 1983; 14: 117-118.
• 55 Spelde AG. et al. Pathological-anatomical study concerning the geometry and atherosclerosis of the carotid bifurcation. Eur J Vasc Surg 1990; 4: 345-348.
• 56 Fisher M, Fieman S. Geometric factors of the bifurcation in carotid atherogen-esis. Stroke 1990; 21: 267-271.
• 57 Smedby O. et al. Two-dimensional tortuosity of the superficial femoral artery in early atherosclerosis. J Vasc Res 1993; 30: 181-191.
• 58 Smedby O. Geometric risk factors for atherosclerosis in the aortic bifurcation: a digitized angiography study. Ann Biomed Eng 1996; 24: 481-488.
• 59 Smedby O. Geometrical risk factors for atherosclerosis in the femoral artery: a longitudinal angiographic study. Ann Biomed Eng 1998; 26: 391-397.
• 60 Ravensbergen J. et al. Localizing role of hemodynamics in atherosclerosis in several human vertebrobasilar junction geometries. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1998; 18: 708-716.
• 61 Schulz UG, Rothwell PM. Major Variation in Carotid Bifurcation Anatomy A Possible Risk Factor for Plaque Development?. Stroke 2001; 32: 2522-2529.
• 62 Polak JF. et al. Segment-Specific Associations of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness With Cardiovascular Risk Factors: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Stroke 2010; 41: 9-15.
• 63 Sitzer M. et al. Internal Carotid Artery Angle of Origin. A Novel Risk Factor for Early Carotid Atherosclerosis. Stroke 2003; 34: 950-955.
• 64 Phan TG. et al. Carotid artery anatomy and geometry as risk factors for carotid atherosclerotic disease. Stroke 2012; 43: 1596-1601.
• 65 Gallo D. et al. An insight into the mechanistic role of the common carotid artery on the hemodynamics at the carotid bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 2015; 43: 68-81.
• 66 Morbiducci U. et al. Mechanistic insight into the physiological relevance of helical blood flow in the human aorta: an in vivo study. Biomech Model Mechan-obiol 2011; 10: 339-355.
• 67 Frydrychowicz A. et al. Interdependencies of aortic arch secondary flow patterns, geometry, and age analysed by 4-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1122-1130.
• 68 Boucek RJ. et al. Clinical and Pathologic Features of Obstructive Disease in the Predominant Right and Left Coronary Circulations in Man. Circulation 1980; 62: 485-490.
• 69 Malvé M. et al. Tortuosity of Coronary Bifurcation as a Potential Local Risk Factor for Atherosclerosis: CFD Steady State Study Based on In Vivo Dynamic CT Measurements. Ann Biomed Eng 2015; 43: 82-93.
• 70 Chaichana T. et al. Computation of hemodynamics in the left coronary artery with variable angulations. J Biomech 2011; 44: 1869-1878.
• 71 Dong J. et al. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of the left coronary artery with variable angulation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2015; 18: 1500-1508.
• 72 Perktold K, Peter R. Numerical 3D-simulation of pulsatile wall shear stress in an arterial T-bifurcation model. J Biomed Eng 1990; 12: 2-12.
• 73 Frattolin J. et al. Numerical study of stenotic side branch hemodynamics in true bifurcation lesions. Comput Biol Med 2015; 57: 130-138.
• 74 Svindland A. The localisation of sudanophilic and fibrous plaques in the main left coronary bifurcation. Atherosclerosis 1983; 48: 139-145.
• 75 Kimura BJ. et al. Atheroma morphology and distribution in proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: In vivo observations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 825-831.
• 76 Badak O. et al. Characteristics of atherosclerotic plaque distribution in coronary artery bifurcations: an intravascular ultrasound analysis. Coron Artery Dis 2003; 14: 309-316.
• 77 Van der Giessen AG. et al. Plaque and shear stress distribution in human coronary bifurcations: a multislice computed tomography study. EuroIntervention 2009; 4: 654-661.
• 78 Gijsen FJH. et al. 3D reconstruction techniques of human coronary bifurcations for shear stress computations. J Biomech 2014; 47: 39-43.
• 79 Molony DS. et al. An assessment of intra-patient variability on observed relationships between wall shear stress and plaque progression in coronary arteries. Biomed Eng Online 2015; 14: 1-14.
• 80 Stone PH. et al. Prediction of progression of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes using vascular profiling of endothelial shear stress and arterial plaque characteristics: the PREDICTION Study. Circulation 2012; 126: 172-181.
• 81 Corban MT. et al. Combination of plaque burden, wall shear stress, and plaque phenotype has incremental value for prediction of coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability. Atherosclerosis 2014; 232: 271-276.
• 82 Samady H. et al. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2011; 124: 779-788.
• 83 Wentzel JJ. et al. In vivo assessment of the relationship between shear stress and necrotic core in early and advanced coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2013; 9: 989-995.
• 84 Wentzel JJ. et al. Extension of increased atherosclerotic wall thickness into high shear stress regions is associated with loss of compensatory remodeling. Circulation 2003; 108: 17-23.
• 85 Fukumoto Y. et al. Localized elevation of shear stress is related to coronary plaque rupture: a 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study with in-vivo color mapping of shear stress distribution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 645-650.
• 86 Gijsen F. et al. Shear stress and advanced atherosclerosis in human coronary arteries. J Biomech 2013; 46: 240-247.
• 87 Gijsen FJH. et al. Strain distribution over plaques in human coronary arteries relates to shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008; 295: H1608-1614.
• 88 Gijsen FJH. et al. High shear stress induces a strain increase in human coronary plaques over a 6-month period. EuroIntervention 2011; 7: 121-127.
• 89 Papadopoulou SL. et al. Assessment of atherosclerotic plaques at coronary bifurcations with multidetector computed tomography angiography and intravascu-lar ultrasound-virtual histology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 13: 635-642.
• 90 Diletti R. et al. Assessment of coronary atherosclerosis progression and regression at bifurcations using combined IVUS and OCT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 774-780.
• 91 Gonzalo N. et al. In Vivo Assessment of High-Risk Coronary Plaques at Bifurcations With Combined Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 2: 473-482.
• 92 García-García HM. et al. A comparison of the distribution of necrotic core in bifurcation and non-bifurcation coronary lesions: An in vivo assessment using in-travascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. EuroIntervention 2010; 6: 321-327.
• 93 Jia H. et al. Insights into the spatial distribution of lipid-rich plaques in relation to coronary artery bifurcations. Coron Artery Dis 2015; 26: 133-141.
• 94 Ding Z. et al. Influence of the geometry of the left main coronary artery bifurcation on the distribution of sudanophilia in the daughter vessels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17: 1356-1360.
• 95 Dvir D. et al. Degrees of severe stenoses in sigma-shaped versus C-shaped right coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 294-298.
• 96 Demirbag R, Yilmaz R. Effects of the shape of coronary arteries on the presence, extent, and severity of their disease. Heart Vessels 2005; 20: 224-229.
• 97 Koskinas KC. et al. Synergistic effect of local endothelial shear stress and systemic hypercholesterolemia on coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression and composition in pigs. Int J Cardiol 2013; 169: 394-401.
• 98 Goldstein JL, Brown MS. A Century of Cholesterol and Coronaries: From Plaques to Genes to Statins. Cell 2015; 161: 161-172.
• 99 Cibis M. et al. Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries. NMR Biomed 2014; 27: 826-834.
• 100 Gullu AU. et al. The comparison of angiographic lesions and clinical outcomes in identical twins. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007; 6: 575-576.
• 101 Nathoe HMW. et al. Angiographic findings in monozygotic twins with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 1006-1009.
• 102 Dull RO, Davies PF. Flow modulation of agonist (ATP)-response (Ca2+) coupling in vascular endothelial cells. Am J Physiol 1991; 261: H149-H154.
• 103 Tarbell JM. Mass transport in arteries and the localisation of atherosclerosis. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2003; 5: 79-118.
• 104 Coppola G, Caro CG. Oxygen mass transfer in a model three-dimensional artery. J RS Interface 2008; 5: 1067-1075.