Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20(02): 92-97
DOI: 10.1160/VCOT-06-04-0033
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of three approaches to meniscal release

B. Austin
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University Auburn, Alabama, USA
,
R. D. Montgomery
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University Auburn, Alabama, USA
,
J. Wright
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University Auburn, Alabama, USA
,
J. R. Bellah
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University Auburn, Alabama, USA
,
C. Tonks
1   Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University Auburn, Alabama, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 22 April 2006

Accepted 07 July 2006

Publication Date:
18 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Three approaches to medial meniscal release (MMR) were compared using 48 canine cadaver stifles. The approaches included a caudomedial arthrotomy approach, a blind stab incision based on anatomic landmarks, and an arthroscopic guided approach. The cranial cruciate ligament was intact in all specimens. The time required to perform the meniscal release and joint capsule closure was recorded, as well as completeness and location of the meniscal transection. Damage to the caudal cruciate ligament, femoral cartilage, and medial collateral ligament were recorded. The mini-arthrotomy was 81% successful in accomplishment of MMR with a 4% rate of iatrogenic damage. The blind technique was 56% successful in the accomplishment of MMR with a 4% rate of iatrogenic damage. The arthroscopic guided approach was 62.5% successful in accomplishment of MMR, with a 10% rate of iatrogenic damage. Accomplishment and iatrogenic damage rates were not significantly different among procedures (p>0.05). Significantly less time was required to perform the blind technique, and significantly greater time was required to perform the arthroscopic guided technique (p>0.05). Significant differences were not noted among the procedures regarding the ability to accomplish the meniscal release or damage surrounding structures. None of the evaluated approaches for meniscal release resulted in a complete and accurate meniscal release for over 81% of the time.

Keywords

Meniscus - release - TPLO - TTA
 

  • References

  • 1 Vasseur PB. Stifle joint. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter D. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2003: 2095-2116.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Moore Moore, Read RA. Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs - Part 1. Comp Contin Educ Pract 1996; 18: 223-385.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wilke VL, Robinson DA, Evans RB. et al. Estimate of the annual economic impact of treatment of cranial cruciate ligament injury in dogs in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227: 1604-1607.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Timmermann C, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Nolte I. Meniscus injuries in dogs with rupture of the cruciate ligament. (in German). Dtsch Tierarztl Wo- chenschr 1998; 105: 374-377.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ralphs Ralphs, Whitney WO. Arthroscopic evaluation of menisci in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament injuries: 100 cases (1999-2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 1601-1604.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Arnoczky Arnoczky, Warren RF. The microvascuature of the meniscus and its response to injury. Am J Sports Med 1983; 11: 131-141.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Devitt CM. Managing the medial meniscus. In: ACVS Veterinary Symposium. San Diego, CA 2005; 454-456.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dejardin LM. Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter D. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2002: 2133-2143.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Moses PA. A technique for the surgical repair of caudal peripheral detachment and longitudinal peripheral tears of the medial meniscus in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2002; 15: 92-96.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Slocum Slocum, Slocum TD. Knee. In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. Bojrab MJ. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1998: 1187-1244.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Johnson KA, Francis DJ, Manley PA. et al. Comparison of the effects of caudal pole hemi-menis- cectomy and complete medial meniscectomy in the canine stifle joint. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 1053-1060.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Conzemius MG, Evans RB, Besancon MF. et al. Effect of surgical technique on limb function after surgery for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 232-236.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hulse DA, Shires P, Abdelbaki YZ. et al. Vascular access channelling to increase meniscal regeneration in the dog. AmJVetRes 1986; 15: 414-419.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Abdel-Hamid M, Hussein MR, Ahmad AF. et al. Enhancement of the repair of meniscal wounds in the red-white zone (middle third) by the injection of bone marrow cells in canine animal model. Int JExp Pathol 2005; 86: 117-123.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Boudrieau RJ. Tibial Tuberosity Advancement (TTA): Clinical results. In: ACVS Veterinary Symposium. San Diego, CA: 2005: 443-445.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Pozzi A, Kowalski M, Apelt D. et al. Motion of the caudal pole of the medial meniscus after meniscal release. In: ACVS Veterinary Symposium. San Diego, CA: 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Aragon Aragon, Budsberg SC. Applications of evidence-based medicine: cranial cruciate ligament injury repair in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 93-98.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ballagas AJ, Montgomery RD, Henderson RA. et al. Pre- and postoperative force plate analysis of dogs with experimentally transected cranial cruciate ligaments treated using tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 187-190.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Barnhart MD. Results of single-session bilateral tibial plateau leveling osteotomies as a treatment for bilaterally ruptured cranial cruciate ligaments in dogs: 25 cases (2000-2001). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003; 39: 573-578.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lazar TP, Berry CR, deHaan JJ. et al. Long-term radiographic comparison of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy versus extracapsular stabilization for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 133-141.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lineberger JA, Allen DA, Wilson ER. et al. Comparison of radiographic arthritic changes associated with two variations of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 13-17.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pacchiana PD, Morris E, Gillings SL. et al. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 397 cases (1998-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 184-193.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Priddy II NH, Tomlinson JL, Dodam JR. et al. Complications with and owner assessment of the outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 193 cases (1997-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 1726-1732.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Reif U, Hulse DA, Hauptman JG. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on stability of the canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joint: an in vitro study. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 147-154.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kennedy SC, Dunning D, Bischoff MG. et al. The effect of axial and abaxial release onmeniscal displacement in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 227-234.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Matis U, Brahm-Jorda T, Koestlin R. Experience withmeniscal release. In: ACVS Veterinary Symposium. San Diego, CA 2005; 457-458.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Motulsky H. Simple linear regression. In: Intuitive Biostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995: 167-180.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Motulsky H. Comparing three or more means: Analysis of variance. In: Intuitive Biostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995: 255-262.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Motulsky H. Comparing two paired groups: paired t and Wilcoxon tests. In: Intuitive Biostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995: 225-229.
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Mankin HJ. Cartilage healing. In: Pathophysiology in small animal surgery. Bojrab MJ. Philadelphia: Lea&Febiger; 1981: 557-567.
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Warzee CC, Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP. et al. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on cranial and caudal tibial thrusts in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: an in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 278-286.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hoelzler MG, Millis DL, Francis DA. et al. Results of arthroscopic versus open arthrotomy for surgical management of cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 146-153.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Whitney WO. Arthroscopically assisted surgery of the stifle joint. In: Beale BS, editor Small Animal Arthroscopy. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003: 117-157.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Duval JM, Budsberg SC, Flo GL. et al. Breed, sex, and body weight as risk factors for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in young dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 215: 811-814.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Whitney WO. Development of the viewing window in canine stifle arthroscopy. In: ACVS Veterinary Symposium. San Diego, CA: 2005: 446-447.
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Beale Beale, Hulse DA. Second-look arthroscopy: what happens after TPLO. In: ACVS Veterinary Symposium. San Diego, CA: 2005: 474-477.
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Cook JL. Managing the medial meniscus. In: ACVS Veterinary Symposium. San Diego, CA: 2005: 452-453.
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Rayward RM, Thomson DG, Davies JV. et al. Progression of osteoarthritis following TPLO surgery: a prospective radiographic study of 40 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2004; 45: 92-97.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Pozzi A, Litzky A, Field J. et al. In vitro effect of meniscal release on load transmission in stifles with and without tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. In: ACVS Veterinary Symposium. San Diego, CA: 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Damur DM. Tibial tuberosity advancement: clinical results. In: ACVS Veterinary Symposium. San Diego, CA: 2005: 441-442.
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Weinstabl R, Muellner T, Vecsei V. et al. Economic considerations for the diagnosis and therapy of meniscal lesions: can magnetic resonance imaging help reduce the expense?. World J Surg 1997; 21: 363-368.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Widmer WR, Buckwalter KA, Braunstein EM. et al. Principles of magnetic resonance imaging and application to the stifle joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991; 198: 1914-1922.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Mahn MM, Cook JL, Cook CR. et al. Arthroscopic verification of ultrasonographic diagnosis of meniscal pathology in dogs. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 318-323.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar