Thromb Haemost 2013; 110(04): 769-776
DOI: 10.1160/TH13-03-0260
Platelets and Blood Cells
Schattauer GmbH

Comparison of antiplatelet effects of prasugrel and ticagrelor in cynomolgus monkeys by an ELISA-based VASP phosphorylation assay and platelet aggregation

Atsuyuki Tomizawa
1   Biological Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
,
Kousaku Ohno
1   Biological Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
,
Joseph A. Jakubowski
2   Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
,
Makoto Mizuno
1   Biological Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
,
Atsuhiro Sugidachi
1   Biological Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 29 March 2013

Accepted after major revision: 15 June 2013

Publication Date:
01 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Prasugrel is the third generation thienopyridine prodrug, and ticagrelor is a non-competitive direct acting P2Y12 antagonist. In phase 3 studies, both agents reduced ischaemic event rates compared to clopidogrel. The present in vitro human and monkey studies showed that ticagrelor’s active metabolite (AM) was more potent than ticagrelor and prasugrel’s AM on inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation by light transmission aggregometry and ELISA-based vasodilatorstimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay. In contrast, on an oral dosage basis (mg/kg), prasugrel showed more potent platelet inhibition compared to ticagrelor on ex vivo aggregation and VASP phosphorylation assays in monkeys. Single oral doses of prasugrel (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) resulted in robust antiplatelet effects, which were sustained up to 24 hours after administration. Ticagrelor (3 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) also showed significant antiplatelet effects but its effects were diminished at 24 hours after the dosing. Repeat administration of prasugrel (1.8 mg/kg loading dose [LD], 0.3 mg/kg once daily maintenance dose [MD]) showed more rapid antiplatelet effects and longer duration of action throughout the entire day. Twice a day repeat administration of ticagrelor (10 mg/kg bid MD following a single 20 mg/kg LD) also showed significant antiplatelet effects but with more intra-day variability compared to prasugrel. The in vitro and ex vivo studies showed strong correlations between platelet aggregation and VASP phosphorylation for prasugrel, ticagrelor and their AMs. These strong correlations between platelet aggregation and VASP phosphorylation in non-human primates also suggest that ELISA-based human VASP assay can be utilised for non-human primate platelet studies.

 
  • References

  • 1 Niitsu Y. et al. Pharmacology of CS-747 (prasugrel, LY640315), a novel, potent antiplatelet agent with in vivo P2Y12 receptor antagonist activity. Semin Thomb Hemost 2005; 31: 184-194.
  • 2 Jakubowski JA. et al. Prasugrel: a novel thienopyridine antiplatelet agent. A review of preclinical and clinical studies and the mechanistic basis for its distinct antiplatelet profile. Cardiovasc Drug Rev 2007; 25: 357-374.
  • 3 Sugidachi A. et al. Antiplatelet action of R-99224, an active metabolite of a novel thienopyridine-type G(i)-linked P2T antagonist, CS-747. Br J Pharmacol 2001; 132: 47-54.
  • 4 Sugidachi A. et al. The greater in vivo antiplatelet effects of prasugrel as compared to clopidogrel reflect more efficient generation of its active metabolite with similar antiplatelet activity to that of clopidogrel’s active metabolite. J Thomb Haemost 2007; 5: 1545-1551.
  • 5 Dobesh PP. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel, a thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitor. Pharmacotherapy 2009; 29: 1089-1102.
  • 6 Wiviott SD. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
  • 7 Li YG. et al. Inhibition of platelet aggregation with prasugrel and clopidogrel: an integrated analysis in 846 subjects. Platelets 2009; 20: 316-327.
  • 8 van Giezen JJ. et al. Ticagrelor binds to human P2Y12 independently from ADP but antagonizes ADP-induced receptor signaling and platelet aggregation. J Thomb Haemost 2009; 7: 1556-1565.
  • 9 Wijeyeratne YD. et al. Ticagrelor: a P2Y12 antagonist for use in acute coronary syndromes. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2012; 5: 257-269.
  • 10 Wallentin L. et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057.
  • 11 Teng R, Butler K. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability and safety of single ascending doses of ticagrelor, a reversibly binding oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist, in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 66: 487-496.
  • 12 Sugidachi A. et al. A comparison of the pharmacological profiles of prasugrel and ticagrelor assessed by platelet aggregation, thombus formation and haemostasis in rats. Br J Pharmacol 2013; 169: 82-89.
  • 13 Alber HF. et al. Prasugrel vs. ticagrelor in acute coronary syndromes: which one to choose?. Wien Klin Wochensch 2011; 123: 468-476.
  • 14 Alexopoulos D. et al. Ticagrelor versus prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity following percutaneous coronary intervention: a pharmacodynamic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 193-199.
  • 15 Biondi-Zoccai G. et al. Adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis of prasugrel versus ticagrelor for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol 2011; 150: 325-331.
  • 16 Jakubowski JA. et al. A comparison of the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel and high-dose clopidogrel as assessed by VASP-phosphorylation and light transmission aggregometry. Thomb Haemost 2008; 99: 215-222.
  • 17 Michelson AD. Methods for the measurement of platelet function. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103 (Suppl. 01) 20A-6A.
  • 18 Michelson AD. et al. Current options in platelet function testing. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 4N-10N.
  • 19 Jakubowski JA. et al. The use of the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care device to monitor platelet function across a range of P2Y12 inhibition levels following prasugrel and clopidogrel administration. Thomb Haemost 2008; 99: 409-415.
  • 20 Barragan P. et al. Resistance to thienopyridines: clinical detection of coronary stent thombosis by monitoring of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 59: 295-302.
  • 21 Barragan P. et al. Validation of a novel ELISA-based VASP whole blood assay to measure P2Y12-ADP receptor activity. Thomb Haemost 2010; 104: 410-411.
  • 22 Angiolillo DJ. et al. Differential effects of omeprazole and pantoprazole on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel in healthy subjects: randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover comparison studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 89: 65-74.
  • 23 Jakubowski JA. et al. Comparison of a new ELISA assay with the flow cytometric assay for platelet vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation in whole blood to assess P2Y(12) inhibition. Thomb Haemost 2012; 107: 388-395.
  • 24 Alexander SP. et al. Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC), 5th edition. Br J Pharmacol 2011; 164 (Suppl. 01) S1-S324.
  • 25 Sugidachi A. et al. The in vivo pharmacological profile of CS-747, a novel antiplatelet agent with platelet ADP receptor antagonist properties. Br J Pharmacol 2000; 129: 1439-1446.
  • 26 Savi P. et al. Identification and biological activity of the active metabolite of clopidogrel. Thomb Haemost 2000; 84: 891-896.
  • 27 Springthorpe B. et al. From ATP to AZD6140: the discovery of an orally active reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist for the prevention of thombosis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007; 17: 6013-6018.
  • 28 Sillén H. et al. Determination of ticagrelor and two metabolites in plasma samples by liquid chomatography and mass spectrometry. J Chomatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2010; 878: 2299-2306.
  • 29 van Giezen JJ, Humphies RG. Preclinical and clinical studies with selective reversible direct P2Y12 antagonists. Semin Thomb Hemost 2005; 31: 195-204.
  • 30 Husted SE. et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in patients with stable coronary artery disease: results from the ONSET-OFFSET and RESPOND studies. Clin Pharmacokinet 2012; 51: 397-409.
  • 31 Gurbel PA. et al. Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study. Circulation 2010; 121: 1188-1199.
  • 32 Jernberg T. et al. Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1166-1173.
  • 33 Parodi G. et al. Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 1601-1606.
  • 34 Niitsu Y. et al. Repeat oral dosing of prasugrel, a novel P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, results in cumulative and potent antiplatelet and antithombotic activity in several animal species. Eur J Pharmacol 2008; 579: 276-282.
  • 35 National Center for Biotechnology Information. Blast analysis of human VASP revealed close matches with hypothetical protein EGM_09874, partial of Macaca fascicularis (ACCESSION No. EHH59696). Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/355755949?report=genbank&log$=prottop&blast_rank=1&RID=C0DUXR3D014 Accessed February 26, 2013.
  • 36 Pampuch A. et al. Comparison of VASP-phosphorylation assay to light-transmission aggregometry in assessing inhibition of the platelet ADP P2Y12 receptor. Thomb Haemost 2006; 96: 767-773.
  • 37 Aleil B. et al. Flow cytometric analysis of intraplatelet VASP phosphorylation for the detection of clopidogrel resistance in patients with ischemic cardiovascular diseases. J Thomb Haemost 2005; 3: 85-92.
  • 38 Bourguet N. et al. Evaluation of ELISA-based VASP assay with whole blood samples from several animal species, and compatibility with various platelet antagonists. J Thomb Haemost 2011; 9: 971-1027.