Skull Base 2008; 18(4): 281-287
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1043753
CASE REPORT

© Thieme Medical Publishers

CNAP To Predict Functional Cochlear Nerve Preservation in NF-2: Cochlear Implant or Auditory Brainstem Implant

Enrico Piccirillo1 , Maurizio Guida1 , Sean Flanagan2 , Lorenzo Lauda1 , Paolo Fois1 , Mario Sanna1
  • 1Gruppo Otologico, Otology and Skull Base Quaternary Referral Center, Piacenza-Rome, Italy
  • 2Department of Otology/Neuro-Otology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 February 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

The ideal management of bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs) involves complete tumor resection with preservation of hearing in at least one ear. While auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) have represented a significant advance in the management of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2) patients, hearing rehabilitation is far from ideal. More recently, cochlear implantation has been used in selected cases of NF-2, following tumor removal, where the patient is left with bilateral profound hearing loss but with anatomical continuity of the cochlear nerve. In selected cases, cochlear implant (CI) has given superior results to ABI. The Gruppo Otologico experience in managing NF-2 patients consists of 29 patients treated between December 1996 and December 2007 out of a total of 1723 VSs. Thirty-nine tumors have been removed, with 10 patients having had bilateral tumor removed. Ten ABIs have been implanted and 5 CIs placed. We present a case that illustrates some of the difficulties encountered in the management of NF-2 VS and provides a basis for discussion of a technique to assist intraoperative decision-making to achieve optimal hearing rehabilitation. In the setting of a negative fast auditory brainstem response (ABR), but preserved cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP), the option of a CI can be considered. However, where the fast ABR and the morphology and amplitude of the CNAP are significantly degraded at the brainstem, the placement of an ABI should be strongly considered at the time of tumor removal. This technique must be further evaluated, but it represents an adjunct in this difficult area for the neurotologist. To this end we propose that a multicenter trial be undertaken to further elucidate the role of intraoperative monitoring to determine the functional preservation of the cochlear nerve.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Doyle K J, Shelton C. Hearing preservation in bilateral acoustic neuroma surgery.  Am J Otol. 1993;  14 562-565
  • 2 Hughes G B, Sismanis A, Glasscock III M E, Hays J W, Jackson C G. Management of bilateral acoustic tumors.  Laryngoscope. 1982;  92 1351-1359
  • 3 Slattery III W H, Brackmann D E, Hitselberger W. Hearing preservation in neurofibromatosis type 2.  Am J Otol. 1998;  19 638-643
  • 4 Smith M F, Clancy T P, Lang J S. Conservation of hearing in acoustic neurilemmoma excision.  Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1977;  84(4 Pt 1) ORL-704-ORL-709
  • 5 Jackler R B. Neurotology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA; Elselvier Mosby 2005
  • 6 Otto S R, Brackman D E, Hitselberger W E, Shannon R V. Brainstem electronic implants for bilateral anacusis following surgical removal of cerebello pontine angle lesions.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2001;  34 485-499
  • 7 Nevison B, Laszig R, Sollmann W P et al.. Results from a European clinical investigation of the Nucleus multichannel auditory brainstem implant.  Ear Hear. 2002;  23 170-183
  • 8 Otto S R, Brackmann D E, Hitselberger W E, Shannon R V, Kuchta J. Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patients.  J Neurosurg. 2002;  96 1063-1071
  • 9 Moller A R. Physiological basis for cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.  Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;  64 206-223
  • 10 Sanna M, Agarwal M, Mancini F, Taibah A. Transapical extension in difficult cerebellopontine angle tumors.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;  113 676-682
  • 11 Falcioni M, Romano G, Aggarwal N, Sanna M. Cerebrospinal fluid leak after retrosigmoid excision of vestibular schwannomas.  Otol Neurotol (Epub ahead of print).
  • 12 Lustig L R, Yeagle J, Driscoll C L et al.. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27 512-518
  • 13 Ahsan S, Telischi F, Hodges A, Balkany T. Cochlear implantation concurrent with translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma resection.  Laryngoscope. 2003;  113 472-474
  • 14 Neff B A, Wiet R M, Lasak J M et al.. Cochlear implantation in the neurofibromatosis type 2 patient: long-term follow-up.  Laryngoscope. 2007;  117 1069-1072
  • 15 Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, Di Trapani G, Sanna M. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.  Audiol Neurootol. 2008;  13 273-280
  • 16 Cueva R A, Thedinger B A, Harris J P, Glasscock III M E. Electrical promontory stimulation in patients with intact cochlear nerve and anacusis following acoustic neuroma surgery.  Laryngoscope. 1992;  102 1220-1224
  • 17 Kartush J M, Linstrom C J, Graham M D, Kulick K C, Bouchard K R. Promontory stimulation following labyrinthectomy: implications for cochlear implantation.  Laryngoscope. 1990;  100 5-9
  • 18 Hoffman R A, Kohan D, Cohen N L. Cochlear implants in the management of bilateral acoustic neuromas.  Am J Otol. 1992;  13 525-528
  • 19 Arriaga M A, Marks S. Simultaneous cochlear implantation and acoustic neuroma resection: imaging considerations, technique, and functional outcome.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;  112 325-328
  • 20 Tono T, Ushisako Y, Morimitsu T. Cochlear implantation in an intralabyrinthine acoustic neuroma patient after resection of an intracanalicular tumor.  Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;  52 155-157
  • 21 Aristegui M, Denia A. Simultaneous cochlear implantation and translabyrinthine removal of vestibular schwannoma in an only hearing ear: report of two cases (neurofibromatosis type 2 and unilateral vestibular schwannoma).  Otol Neurotol. 2005;  26 205-210
  • 22 Yinling C, Ashram Y. Intraoperative monitoring of cranial nerves in skull base surgery. In: Jackler RK, Brackmann DE Neurotology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia; Elselvier Mosby 2005
  • 23 Colletti V, Fiorino F G, Mocella S, Policante Z. ECochG, CNAP and ABR monitoring during vestibular schwannoma surgery.  Audiology. 1998;  37 27-37
  • 24 Piccirillo E. Intra-operative cochlear nerve monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery: does it really affect hearing outcome?.  Audiol Neurootol. 2008;  13 58-64
  • 25 Tucker A, Slattery III W H, Solcyk L, Brackmann D E. Intraoperative auditory assessments as predictors of hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma surgery.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2001;  12 471-477
  • 26 Jaaskelainen J, Paetau A, Pyykko I et al.. Interface between the facial nerve and large acoustic neurinomas: immunohistochemical study of the cleavage plane in NF2 and non-NF2 cases.  J Neurosurg. 1994;  80 541-547
  • 27 Samii M, Matthies C, Tatagiba M. Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): auditory and facial nerve function after resection of 120 vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 2.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  40 696-705 discussion 705-706
  • 28 Moller A. Physiology of the auditory system and recording of auditory evoked potentials. In: Kartush JM, Bouchard KR Neuromonitoring in Otology and Head and Neck Surgery. New York, NY; Raven Press 1992: 163-198

Enrico PiccirilloM.D. 

Via Emmanueli 42

Piacenza 2900, Italy

Email: enricopiccirillo@libero.it