Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2008; 43(1): 38-43
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038089
Fachwissen
Intensivmedizin
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Analgosedierung – Umsetzung der S2e–Leitlinien dient der Prozessoptimierung

Optimisation of sedation practice in ICU by implementing of S2e GuidelinesPaul Kessler, Jörg Martin
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 January 2008 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Eine leitlinienorientierte Analgosedierung mit Festlegung des Sedierungsziels und dem Monitoring der Analgosedierungstiefe mittels Scoring–Systemen, der richtigen Auswahl der Medikamente sowie der Anwendung patientenorientierter Regimes verkürzt die Beatmungszeit, die Intensivbehandlung und die Krankenhausverweildauer bei geringerer Komplikationsrate und erhöhter Qualität. Eine Implementierung der von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin publizierten S2e–Leitlinien zur Analgosedierung in die klinische Praxis kann sich somit aufgrund einer kürzeren Behandlungsdauer und einer Verringerung der Fallkosten positiv auf die Erlössicherung eines Krankenhauses unter DRG–Bedingungen auswirken.

Abstract:

The S2e Guidelines for sedation practice of the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care recommend a clear prior definition of depth of sedation to be achieved in a given case, monitoring of depth of sedation by means of scoring systems, appropriate selection of analgesics and sedatives and the use of patient–oriented treatment regimens. These measures not only reduce significantly length of artificial respiration, length of time spent on the intensive care unit and overall length of stay in the hospital but also the frequency of complications. Therefore, implementation of the Guidelines will result in significant reductions in costs in a given case. This is a decisive economic benefit for any hospital working under the restraints of the DRG system.

Literatur

  • 1 Roeder N, Hensen P, Hindle D. et al. . Instrumente zur Behandlungsoptimierung – Klinische Behandlungspfade Chirurg.  2003;  74 1149-55
  • 2 Soliman HM, Melot C, Vincent JL.. Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit: the results of a European survey.  Br J Anaesth. 2001;  87 186-92
  • 3 Martin J, Bäsell K, Bürkle H. et al. .Anästhesiol Intensivmed 2005: 1-20
  • 4 Novaes MA, Knobel E, Bork AM. et al. . Stressors in ICU: perception of the patient, relatives and health care team et al.  Int Care Med. 1999;  25 1421-6
  • 5 Hughes MA, Glass PS, Jacobs JR.. Context–sensitive half–time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs.  Anesthesiology. 1992;  76 334-41
  • 6 Martin J, Parsch A, Franck M. et al. . Practice of sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: results of a national survey.  Critical Care. 2005;  9
  • 7 Wilhelm W, Wrobel M, Kreuer S, Larsen R.. Remifentanil. An update.  Anaesthesist. 2003;  52 473-94
  • 8 Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB. et al. . Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult.  Crit Care Med. 2002;  30 119-41
  • 9 Ruoff G, Lema M. Strategies in pain management: new and potential indications for COX–2 specific inhibitors.  J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003;  25 21-31
  • 10 Ostermann ME, Keenan SP, Seiferling RA. et al. . Sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.  JAMA. 2000;  283 1451-9
  • 11 Walz M, Mollenhoff G, Muhr G.. Verkürzung der Weaningphase nach maschineller Beatmung durch kombinierte Gabe von Clonidin und Sufentanil.  Chirurg. 1999;  70 66-73
  • 12 Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, deFerranti S. et al. . The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta–analyses of randomized, controlled trials et al.  Anesth Analg. 1998;  86 598-612
  • 13 Low JH.. Survey of epidural analgesia management in general intensive care units in England.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;  46 799-805
  • 14 Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O'Connor MF. et al. . Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1471-7
  • 15 Martin J, Schleppers A, Kastrup M. et al. . Entwicklung von Standard Operating Procedures in der Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin.  Anästh Intensivmed. 2003;  44 871-876
  • 16 Murdoch S, Cohen A.. Intensive care sedation: a review of current British practice.  Intensive Care Med. 2000;  26 922-8
  • 17 Kong R, Payen D.. Controlling sedation rather than sedation controlling you.  Clin Intensive Care. 1994;  5 5-7
  • 18 Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR. et al. . Controlled sedation with alphaxalone–alphadolone.  Br Med J. 1974;  2 656-9
  • 19 Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL.. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation–Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients.  Crit Care Med. 1999;  27 1325-9
  • 20 Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani al. A et. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients:reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation–Sedation Scale (RASS).  JAMA. 2003;  289 2983-91
  • 21 Payen JF, Bru O, Bosson JL. et al. . Assessing pain in critically ill sedated patients by using a behavioral pain scale.et al.  Crit Care Med. 2001;  29 2258-63
  • 22 Agarwal N, Reyes JD, Westerman DA. et al. . Factors influencing DRG 210 (hip fracture) reimbursement.  J Trauma. 1986;  26 426-31
  • 23 Basse L, Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P. et al. . A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection.  Ann Surg. 2000;  232 51-7
  • 24 Gottlieb LD, Roer D, Jega K. et al. . Clinical pathway for pneumonia:development, implementation, and initial experience.  Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1996;  1 262-5
  • 25 Schreiber TL, Elkhatib A, Grines CL. et al. . Cardiologist versus internist management of patients with unstable angina: treatment patterns and outcomes.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;  26 577-82
  • 26 Henneman E, Dracup K, Ganz T. et al. . Effect of a collaborative weaning plan on patient outcome in the critical care setting.  Crit Care Med. 2001;  29 297-303
  • 27 Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS. et al. . The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation.  Chest. 1998;  114 541-8
  • 28 Brattebo G, Hofoss D, Flaatten H. et al. . Effect of a scoring system and protocol for sedation on duration of patients' need for ventilator support in a surgical intensive care unit.  BMJ. 2002;  324 1386-9
  • 29 Schaffrath E, Kuhlen R, Tonner PH.. Analgesie und Sedierung in der Intensivmedizin.  Anaesthesist. 2004;  53 1111-32
  • 30 Barrientos–Vega R, Sanchez–Soria MM, Morales–Garcia C. et al. . Pharmacoeconomic assessment of propofol 2 % used for prolonged sedation.  Crit Care Med. 2001;  29 317-22
  • 31 Chanques G, Jaber S, Barbotte E. et al. . Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit.  Crit Care Med. 2006;  34 1691-1699
  • 32 Bauer C, Kreuer S, • R Ketter. et al. . Anaesthesist. 2007;  56 128-132
  • 33 Bray RJ. Propofol infusion syndrome in children.  Paediatr Anaesth. 1998;  8 491-499
  • 34 Rundshagen I, Schnabel K, Pothmann W. et al. . Cortical arousal in critically ill patients: an evoked response study.  Intensive Care Med. 2000;  26 1312-1318
  • 35 Fraser GL, Riker RR.. Sedation and analgesia in the critically ill adult.  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;  20 119-123
  • 36 Martin J, Franck M, Fischer M. et al. . Sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: how is it done in reality? Results of a patient–based survey of analgesia and sedation.  Intensive Care Med. 2006;  32 1137-1142

Prof. Dr. med. Paul Kessle

Email: P.Kessler@friedrichsheim.de

PD Dr. med. Jörg Martin

Email: Joerg.Martin@email.de