Background and Study Aims: Brush cytology of biliary strictures has a low sensitivity for diagnosing malignancy, and additional diagnostic tools are needed. The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic importance of DNA measurements as an adjunct to brush cytology in patients with biliary strictures. Patients and Methods: All patients (n = 225) with bile duct strictures who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) between January 1997 and October 2003 at the Department of Radiology at Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden, were included in the study. While 66 patients had an unclear final diagnosis and were therefore excluded, the remaining 159 patients were assessed with brush cytology and DNA flow cytometry.
Results: Sensitivity and specificity of DNA aneuploidy for tumor detection were 43 % and 96 %. Using DNA analysis in addition to brush cytology, the sensitivity was 62 % compared with 57 % for brush cytology alone (not significant). Patients with diploid DNA tumors had a significantly better survival than patients with aneuploid DNA tumors (P = 0.02). The mean survival was 10 months for diploid cancers and 6 months for aneuploid cancers.
Conclusion: DNA ploidy measurement may be a diagnostic method that could supplement brush cytology in the identification of malignancy in biliary strictures. DNA aneuploidy is a marker of poor prognosis in patients with malignant biliary strictures.
2
Verbeek P C, van Leeuwen D J, de Wit L T. et al .
Benign fibrosing disease at the hepatic confluence mimicking Klatskin tumors.
Surgery.
1992;
112
866-871
5
Ferrari Jr A P , Lichtenstein D R, Slivka A. et al .
Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1994;
40
140-145
6
Rabinovitz M, Zajko A B, Hassanein T. et al .
Diagnostic value of brush cytology in the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma: a study in 65 patients with bile duct strictures.
Hepatology.
1990;
12
747-752
8
Sears R J, Duckworth C W, Decaestecker C. et al .
Image cytometry as a discriminatory tool for cytologic specimens obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Cancer.
1998;
84
119-126
9
Rumalla A, Baron T H, Leontovich O. et al .
Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis.
Mayo Clin Proc.
2001;
76
29-33
10
Ryan M E, Baldauf M C.
Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1994;
40
133-139
11
Lindberg B, Arnelo U, Bergquist A. et al .
Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Endoscopy.
2002;
34
909-916
12
Lundin J, Nordling S, von Boguslawsky K. et al .
Prognostic value of Ki-67 expression, ploidy and S-phase fraction in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Anticancer Res.
1995;
15
2659-2668
13
Karlen P, Kornfeld D, Brostrom O. et al .
Is colonoscopic surveillance reducing colorectal cancer mortality in ulcerative colitis? A population based case control study.
Gut.
1998;
42
711-714
14
Bergquist A, Lindberg B, Castro J, Tribukait B.
Methodologic aspects of evaluating brush samples from biliary strictures by cytology and DNA flow cytometry.
Acta Cytol.
2004;
48
341-347
15
Bohorfoush A, Franco J, Komorowski R. et al .
Flow cytometric analysis of bile duct epithelium in primary sclerosing cholangitis potentially assists in timing of liver transplantation [abstract].
Gastrointest Endosc A.
1997;
45
Abstract no 394
16
Baron T H, Harewood G C, Rumalla A. et al .
A prospective comparison of digital image analysis and routine cytology for the identification of malignancy in biliary tract strictures.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2004;
2
214-219
17
Harewood G C, Baron T H, Stadheim L M. et al .
Prospective, blinded assessment of factors influencing the accuracy of biliary cytology interpretation.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2004;
99
1464-1469
19
Bergquist A, Tribukait B, Glaumann H, Broomé U.
Can DNA cytometry be used for evaluation of malignancy and premalignancy in bile duct strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis?.
J Hepatol.
2000;
33
873-877
20
Abou-Rebyeh H, Al-Abadi H, Jonas S. et al .
DNA analysis of cholangiocarcinoma cells: prognostic and clinical importance.
Cancer Detect Prev.
2002;
26
313-319
21
Yeaton P, Kiss R, Deviere J. et al .
Use of cell image analysis in the detection of cancer from specimens obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Am J Clin Pathol.
1993;
100
497-501
22
Brandsaeter B, Isoniemi H, Broome U. et al .
Liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis; predictors and consequences of hepatobiliary malignancy.
J Hepatol.
2004;
40
815-822
23
Goss J A, Shackleton C R, Farmer D G. et al .
Orthotopic liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. A 12-year single center experience.
Ann Surg.
1997;
225
472-481