Semin Thromb Hemost 2004; 30(6): 703-713
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-861513
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Generic Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins: Some Practical Considerations

Jawed Fareed1 , 2 , Wendy L. Leong3 , Debra A. Hoppensteadt2 , Walter P. Jeske2 , Jeanine Walenga2 , Raisesh Wahi1 , Rodger L. Bick4
  • 1Professor, Departments of Pathology and Pharmacology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL
  • 2Departments of Pathology and Pharmacology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL
  • 3Burnaby Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada
  • 4Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Southwest Medical School, University of Texas, Dallas, TX
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 January 2005 (online)

ABSTRACT

It is now widely accepted that various low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) exhibit specific molecular and structural attributes that are determined by the type of manufacturing process used. For example, enoxaparin, which is prepared by benzylation followed by alkaline hydrolysis of unfractionated heparin (UFH), exhibits a double bond at the nonreducing end and the presence of a unique bicyclic structure namely 1,6 anhydromanno glucose or mannose, or both, at the reducing end. Similarly, the other LMWHs, such as dalteparin, nadroparin, tinzaparin, and parnaparin, exhibit specific structural characteristics that may contribute to their own unique biochemical and pharmacological profiles. These unique features may not exhibit any major influence on the routinely determined anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities. However, these may have an impact on the pharmacokinetics and other biological actions such as the interactions with growth factors, blood components, and vascular cells. This is the reason for the initial caution for the noninterchangeability of the anti-Xa adjusted dosing of the different LMWHs. Although the nonanticoagulant biological effects of these drugs are poorly understood at this time, they are now recognized as contributing significantly to the overall therapeutic effects of these drugs. Because some of these drugs have proved to be effective in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis and exhibit improvements in mortality outcome, these LMWHs may also produce several other effects by modulating inflammatory processes, apoptosis, and other regulatory functions related to cellular functions at different levels. Thus, the interactions of these LMWHs with antithrombin and heparin cofactor II are not the only determinants of their biological actions. Release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), regulation of cytokines, nitric oxide, and eicosanoids contribute to their individuality. Such properties are not only dependent on the oligosaccharide sequence and consensus sites but also depend mainly on microchemical and structural attributes in these drugs. European Pharmacopoeia (EP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have developed guidelines to characterize these agents in terms of their molecular and biological profile. Regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMEA) consider each of these drugs as distinct pharmacological agents. This has prompted the requirement for product-specific clinical data for the approval of their use in various clinical indications. There is a clear concern regarding the development of potential generic versions of branded products and the submissions by generic manufacturers for the regulatory approval of generic interchangeability that refers to the substitution of an apparent chemically identical and bioequivalent versions of the branded LMWHs. Currently, there are no regulatory guidelines or consensus opinions on the acceptance of generic versions of the branded products. Because the LMWHs represent not only a biological entity but also product-specific molecular and structural attributes, the acceptance of a generic version must be based on clearly defined guidelines stipulating minimal molecular and structural, biological, and clinical validation requirements. It is therefore to be stressed that each of the LMWHs is a distinct drug entity that characteristically exhibits a product-based therapeutic spectrum in different thrombotic and nonthrombotic disorders. Thus, until the establishment of valid regulatory guidelines for the generic interchangeability of the commercially available LMWHs is completed, generic substitutes are not recommended.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Merli G, Vanscoy G J, Rihn T L et al.. Applying scientific criteria to therapeutic interchange: A balanced analysis of low molecular weight heparins.  J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2001;  11 247-259
  • 2 American Society of Hospital Pharmacists . ASHP statement on the formulary system.  Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986;  43 2839-2841
  • 3 McCart G M, Kayser S. Therapeutic equivalency of low molecular weight heparins.  Ann Pharmacother. 2002;  36 1042-1057
  • 4 Prandoni P. Low molecular weight heparins: are they interchangeable? Yes.  J Thromb Haemost. 2003;  1 10-11
  • 5 Nenci G. Low molecular weight heparins: are they interchangeable? No.  J Thromb Haemost. 2003;  1 12-13
  • 6 Bick R L, Fareed J. Low molecular weight heparin: differences and similarities in approved preparations in the United States.  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 1999;  5(Suppl 1) S63-S66
  • 7 Fareed J, Hoppensteadt D, Jeske W, Clarizio R, Walenga J M. Low molecular weight heparins. Are they different?.  Can J Cardiol. 1998;  14(Suppl E) 28E-34E
  • 8 Leong W, Hoppensteadt D. Generic forms of low molecular weight heparins: some practical considerations.  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2003;  9 293-297
  • 9 Linhardt R J, Gunay N S. Production and chemical processing of low molecular weight heparins.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 1999;  25(Suppl 3) 5-16
  • 10 Nightingale S L. From the Food and Drug Administration.  JAMA. 1993;  270 1672
  • 11 Hirsh J, Warkentin T E, Raschke R et al.. Heparin and low molecular weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, monitoring, efficacy, and safety.  Chest. 1998;  114(Suppl 5) 489S-510S
  • 12 Ryan T J, Antman E M, Brooks N H et al.. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction) J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 34: 890-911
  • 13 Fareed J, Fu K, Yang L H et al.. Pharmacokinetics of low molecular weight heparins in animal models.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 1999;  25(suppl 3) 51-55
  • 14 Kaiser B, Kirchmaier C M, Breddin H K et al.. Pre-clinical biochemistry and pharmacology of low molecular weight heparins in vivo.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 1999;  25(suppl 3) 35-42
  • 15 Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel E P et al.. A comparison of low molecular weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in non-Q wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) Group.  N Engl J Med. 1997;  337 447-452
  • 16 Klein W, Buchwald A, Hillis W S et al.. Fragmin in unstable angina pectoris or in non-Q wave acute myocardial infarction. Fragmin in unstable coronary artery disease (FRIC).  Am J Cardiol. 1997;  80 30E-34E
  • 17 FRISC Study Group . Low molecular weight heparin during instability in coronary artery disease.  Lancet. 1998;  34 561-568
  • 18 Mousa S, Fareed J. Overview: from heparin to low molecular weight heparins: beyond anticoagulation.  Curr Opin Invest Drug. 2001;  2 1077-1080
  • 19 Fareed J, Kumar A, Walenga J M et al.. Antithrombotic actions and pharmacokinetics of heparin fractions and fragments.  Nouv Rev Fr Hematol. 1984;  26 267-275
  • 20 Fareed J, Walenga J M, Racanelli A et al.. Validity of the newly established low-molecular-weight heparin standard in cross-referencing low-molecular-weight heparins.  Haemostasis. 1988;  18(suppl 3) 33-47
  • 21 Barrett J S, Hainer J W, Kornhauser D M et al.. Anticoagulant pharmacodynamics of tinzaparin following 175 IU/kg subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers.  Thromb Res. 2001;  101 243-254
  • 22 Fareed J, Haas S, Sasahara A Differentiation of low molecular weight heparins: applied and clinical considerations. Semin Thromb Hemost 1999 25(suppl 3): 1-147
  • 23 Fareed J, Walenga J M, Hoppensteadt D, Huan X, Racanelli A. Comparative studies on the in vitro and in vivo activities of seven low-molecular-weight heparins.  Haemostasis. 1988;  18(suppl 3) 3-15
  • 24 Fareed J, Walenga J M, Williamson K et al.. Studies on the antithrombotic effects and pharmacokinetics of heparin fractions and fragments.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 1985;  11 56-74
  • 25 Memorandum on a provisional international standard for heparin . Bull Health Organization League of Nations.  1942;  151-154
  • 26 Barrowcliffe T W, Curtiss A D, Johnson E A, Thomas D P. An international standard for low molecular weight heparin.  Thromb Haemost. 1988;  60 1-7
  • 27 Mulloy B, Gee C, Wheeler S F et al.. Molecular weight measurements of low molecular weight heparins by gel permeation chromatography.  Thromb Haemost. 1997;  77 668-674
  • 28 Cambus J P, Saivin S, Heilmann J J et al.. The pharmacodynamics of tinzaparin in healthy volunteers.  Br J Haematol. 2002;  116 649-653
  • 29 Abboud L. Bush acts to speed generics to market.  The Wall Street Journal . June 12, 2003;  p A3

Jawed FareedPh.D.  Professor

Department of Pathology, Loyola University Chicago

2160 S. First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153

Email: jfareed@lumc.edu