This study proposes a new method to evaluate arm-leg coordination in flat breaststroke. Five arm and leg stroke phases were defined with a velocity-video system. Five time gaps quantified the time between arm and leg actions during three paces of a race (200 m, 100 m and 50 m) in 16 top level swimmers. Based on these time gaps, effective glide, effective propulsion, effective leg insweep and effective recovery were used to identify the different stroke phases of the body.
A faster pace corresponded to increased stroke rate, decreased stroke length, increased propulsive phases, shorter glide phases, and a shorter T1 time gap, which measured the effective body glide. The top level swimmers showed short time gaps (T2, T3, T4, measuring the timing of arm-leg recoveries), which reflected the continuity in arm and leg actions. The measurement of these time gaps thus provides a pertinent evaluation of swimmers' skill in adapting their arm-leg coordination to biomechanical constraints.
Key words
Biomechanics - swimming - motor control - exercise - performance
References
1 Bober T, Czabanski B. Changes in breaststroke techniques under different speed conditions. Clarys JP, Lewillie L Swimming Science II. Baltimore; University Park Press 1975: 188-193
2 Cappaert J M. Rotational balance about the center of mass in the breaststroke. Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strass D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA Swimming Science VII. London; E & FN SPO 1996: 29-33
3 Chollet D, Boulesteix L. Evolution of the butterfly coordination in relation to velocity and skill level of swimmers,. Blackwell JR, Sanders RH XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. San Francisco; ISBS 2001: 22-26
5
Chollet D, Pelayo P, Tourny C, Sidney M.
Comparative analysis of 100 m and 200 m events in the four strokes in top level swimmers.
J Hum Mov Studies.
1996;
31
25-37
6 Chollet D, Tourny-Chollet C, Gleizes F. Evolution of coordination in flat breaststroke in relation to velocity. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finnland; University of Jyvaskyla 1999: 29-32
9 Craig A B, Boomer W L, Skehan P L. Patterns of velocity in competitive breaststroke swimming. Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K Swimming Science V. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 73-77
10
Craig A B, Skehan P L, Pawelczyk J A, Boomer W L.
Velocity, stroke rate, and distance per stroke during elite swimming competition.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1985;
17
625-634
11
D'Acquisto L J, Costill D L, Gehlsen G M, Young W T, Lee G.
Breaststroke economy, skill, and performance: study of breaststroke mechanics using a computer based “velocity-video” system.
J Swim Research.
1988;
4
9-13
12 Fujishima M, Miyashita M. Velocity degradation caused by its fluctuation in swimming and guidelines for improvement of average velocity. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finland; University of Jyvaskula 1999: 41-45
13 Holmer I. Analysis of acceleration as a measure of swimming proficiency. Terauds J, Bedingfield EW Swimming Science III. Baltimore; University Park Press 1979: 118-124
14
Kolmogorov S V, Rumyantseva O A, Gordon B J, Cappaert J M.
Hydrodynamic characteristics of competitive swimmers of different genders and performance levels.
J Appl Biomech.
1997;
13
88-97
16 Manley P K, Atha J. Intra-stroke velocity fluctuations in paced breaststroke swimming. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London, England; E & FN SPO 1992: 151-159
17 Nemessuri M, Vaday M. Breaststroke motor pattern. Lewillie L, Clarys JP Swimming Science I. Brussels, Belgique; Université libre de Bruxelles 1971: 161-166
19 Persyn U JJ, Colman V, Van Tilborgh L. Movement analysis of the flat and undulating breaststroke pattern. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London, England; E & FN SPO 1992: 75-80
20 Persyn U JJ, Hoeven R GC, Daly D J. An evaluation procedure for competitive swimmers. Terauds J, Bedingfield EW Swimming Science III. Baltimore; University Park Press 1979: 182-195
21 Persyn U JJ, Van Tilborgh L, Daly D J, Colman V, Vijfvinkel D J, Verhetsel D. Computerized evaluation and advice in swimming. Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K Swimming Science V. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 341-349
23 Sanders R H. Breaststroke technique variations among New Zealand Pan Pacific squad swimmers. Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strass D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA Swimming Science VII. London, England; E & FN SPO 1996: 64-69
24 Soares P M, Sousa F, Vilas-Boas J P. Differences in breaststroke synchronisation induced by different race velocities. Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander AP Swimming Science VIII. Jyvaskyla, Finland; University of Jyvaskula 1999: 53-57
25 Tourny C, Chollet D, Micallef J P, Macabies J. Comparative analysis of studies of speed variations within a breaststroke cycle. MacLaren D, Reilly T, Less A Swimming Science VI. London, England; E & FN SPO 1992: 161-166
26 Ungerechts B E. The relation of peak body acceleration to phases of movements in swimming. Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K Swimming Science V. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 61-66
27 Van Tilborgh L M, Stijnen V V, Persyn U J. Using velocity fluctuations for estimating resistance and propulsion forces in breaststroke swimming. Johnsson B Biomechanics X-B. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Publishers 1987: 779-784
28 Vilas-Boas J P. Speed fluctuations and energy cost of different breaststroke techniques. Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strass D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA Swimming Science VII. London, England; E & FN SPO 1996: 167-171
29 Vilas-Boas J P, Santos P. Comparison of swimming economy in three breaststroke techniques. Miyashita M, Mutoh Y, Richardson AB Medicine and Science in Aquatic Sports. Vol. 39. Basel; Karger 1994: 48-54
