Endoscopy 2004; 36(6): 551-553
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-814443
Editorial
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Missing Colorectal Cancer

B.  Rembacken1
  • 1Centre for Digestive Diseases, General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 June 2004 (online)

It is a well-recognized fact that colonoscopy misses a proportion of polyps. In this issue of Endoscopy, Leaper et al. [1] show that colonoscopy also misses a proportion of advanced carcinomas. Most of the missed lesions were either not seen or were not recognized as malignant, despite adequate bowel preparation. This finding suggests that we can improve the detection of cancer through improved training.

Another article in this issue addresses the problem of diminutive colonic polyps [2]. Large numbers of small tubular adenomas develop as we grow older. With the use of dye spraying, adenomas have been identified in up to 50 % of asymptomatic patients attending for routine colonoscopy [3]. Hurlstone et al. [2] report that diminutive neoplastic lesions were evident in 70 % of a highly selected patient group when dye spraying and magnification were used.

Although large adenomas must develop from small precursors, the great majority of small adenomas nevertheless do not grow or become cancerous. The overall risk that a 5-mm adenoma will harbour high-grade dysplasia has previously been reported below 1 % [3] [4]. In contrast, the risk of early cancer in the study by Hurlstone et al. was much greater than 1 %. Early cancer (high-grade dysplasia, Tis or T1 cancer) was found on average in 14 % of the lesions, and the median size of the lesions was 6 - 7 mm (range 1 - 20 mm).

It may be significant that the diagnosis of high-grade dysplasia was made by a single histopathologist, who could not be blinded as to the growth pattern of the resected lesion. These findings may therefore require substantiation by other groups before we envisage a need to remove all diminutive colorectal lesions.

References

  • 1 Leaper M, Johnston M J, Barclay M. et al . Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 499-503
  • 2 Hurlstone D P, Cross S S, Adam I. et al . An evaluation of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 491-498
  • 3 Mitooka H, Fujimori T, Maeda S. et al . Colon polyp detected by contrast chromoscopy using indigo carmine dye capsule.  Dig Endosc. 1992;  4 340-354
  • 4 Gottlieb L S, Winawer S J, Sternberg S S. et al . National Polyp Study: the diminutive colonic polyp [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1984;  28 143
  • 5 Atkin W S, Northover J MA. Population based endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.  Gut. 2003;  52 321-322
  • 6 Winawer S J, Zauber A G, Ho M N. et al . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 1977-1981
  • 7 Muller A D, Sonnenberg A. Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer in the general population.  Arch Intern Med. 1995;  155 1741-1748
  • 8 Morson B. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel.  Proc R Soc Med. 1974;  67 451-457
  • 9 Rex D K, Cutler C S, Lemmel G T. et al . Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 24-28
  • 10 Fujii T, Sano Y, Liishi H. et al . Colorectal cancer screening in Japan: results of the multicenter retrospective cohort study [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2002;  122 A481
  • 11 Yamaji Y, Okamoto M, Yoshida H. et al . Clinical features of invasive colorectal cancers which could not be prevented even by vigorous colonoscopy and polypectomy [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2002;  122 A479
  • 12 Kudo S, Kashida H, Tamura S, Nakajima T. The problem of ”flat“ colonic adenoma.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1997;  7 87-98
  • 13 Schlemper R J, Hirata I, Dixon M F. The macroscopic classification of early neoplasia in the gastrointestinal tract.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 163-168
  • 14 Wietlisbach V, Burnand B, Vader J P. et al . Variations in technical performance and quality of use of colonoscopy throughout Europe: the EPAGE multicenter study [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 AB82
  • 15 Atkin W S, Cook C F, Patel R, Edwards R. Variability in yield of adenomas in average risk individuals undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy screening [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2001;  Suppl 1 A66
  • 16 Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Grotmol T. et al . Differences in detection rates of colorectal polyps and adenomas among endoscopists in population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 AB214
  • 17 Blue M G, Sivak M V, Ackar E. et al . Hyperplastic polyps seen at sigmoidoscopy are markers for additional adenomas seen at colonoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  100 564-566
  • 18 Tappero G, Gaia E, DeGiuli P. Cold snare excision of small colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 310-313
  • 19 Rex D K. Endoscopists, polyp size, and post-polypectomy surveillance: making a mountain out of a molehill?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 571-574

B. Rembacken, M. D.

Centre for Digestive Diseases · The General Infirmary at Leeds

Great George Street · Leeds LS1 3EX · United Kingdom

Fax: +44-113-392-6968

Email: bjr@firstnet.co.uk

    >