Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2003; 24(3): 155-180
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-42823
Copyright © 2003 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Speech-Language Caseloads in the Schools: A Workload Analysis Approach to Setting Caseload Standards

Frank Cirrin1 , Ann Bird2 , Larry Biehl3 , Sally Disney4 , Ellen Estomin5 , Judy Rudebusch6 , Trici Schraeder7 , Kathleen Whitmire8
  • 1Minneapolis Public Schools, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • 2State of Nebraska Department of Education, Omaha, Nebraska
  • 3retired from State of Iowa, Area Education Agency 4, Iowa
  • 4Hamilton County Educational Service Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • 5Pittsburgh Public Schools, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 6Irving Independent School District, Irving, Texas
  • 7Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
  • 8American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, Maryland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 October 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

This article highlights key concepts of the recently revised policy documents of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association on workload and caseload size for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in schools. A major premise is that the total workload activities required and performed by school-based SLPs must be taken into account to set appropriate and reasonable caseload standards. Current policies and practices used to define caseloads appear to be inadequate to ensure caseloads that allow enough time for the provision of quality services. In this article we describe school-based SLPs' workload, including the expanded roles and responsibilities that are mandated by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and other legislation. We consider the available research on the effects of large caseloads on the service options chosen by SLPs, treatment outcomes for students, and SLP attrition and burnout. Finally, we present an approach for analyzing a SLP's total workload activities, along with a discussion of how that analysis can be used to help determine caseload standards consistent with meeting the intent of IDEA and the needs of students with disabilities.

KEYWORDS

School speech-language - caseload - workload

REFERENCES

  • 1 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for caseload size and speech-language service delivery in the schools.  ASHA . 1993;  35 (suppl 10) 33-39
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2000 Schools Survey. Rockville, MD: Author; 2000
  • 3 Chiang B, Rylance B. Wisconsin Speech-Language Pathologists' Caseloads: Reality and Repercussions. Oshkosh, WI: University of Wisconsin; 2000
  • 4 Whitmire K. Action: school services.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 2000;  31 308-314
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. National Data Report 1999-2000; National Outcomes Measurement System. Rockville, MD: Author; 2000
  • 6 National Association of State Directors of Special Education. Special education issues in caseload/ class size. NASDSE Quick Turn Around Forum; March 2000
  • 7 Rylance B, Chiang B, Russ S, Dobbs-Whitcomb S. Special Education Caseload and Class Size Policies in the Fifty States.  Madison: Wisconsin State Department of Public Instruction; 1999
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for caseload size and speech-language services in the schools.  ASHA . 1984;  53-58
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Peters-Johnson C. Professional practices perspective on caseloads in schools.  ASHA . 1992;  9 12
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 US Congress. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1997
  • 11 US Department of Education. 22ndAnnual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office 2000
  • 12 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Roles and Responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists with Respect to Reading and Writing in Children and Adolescents (Position Statement). Rockville, MD: Author 2001
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Russ S, Chiang B, Rylance B, Bongers J. Caseload in special education: an integration of research findings.  Except Child . 2001;  67(2) 161-172
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. A Workload Analysis Approach for Establishing Caseload Standards in the Schools. Position Statement/ Guidelines/Technical Report. Rockville, MD: Author 2002
  • 15 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Pre-kindergarten NOMS.  ASHALeader . 2001;  6(16) 25
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2000 schools survey special report: SLPs' roles and responsibilities.  ASHA Leader . 2001;  6(17) 3
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Whitmire K. The evolution of school-based speech-language services: a half century of change and a new century of practice.  Commun Disord Q . 2001;  23(2) 68-76
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. IDEA and Your Caseload. A Template for Eligibility and Dismissal Criteria for Students Ages 3 to 21. Rockville, MD: Author; 2000
  • 19 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. A model for collaborative service delivery for students with language-learning disorders in the public schools.  ASHA . 1991;  33 (suppl 5) 44-50
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Preferred practice patterns for the professions of speech-language pathology Rockville, MD: Author 1997
  • 21 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Inclusive practices for children and youths with communication disorders.  ASHA . 1996;  38 (suppl 16) 35-44
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for the Roles and Responsibilities of the School-Based Speech-Language Pathologist Rockville, MD: Author 1999
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Scope of practice in speech-language pathology.  ASHA Leader . 2002;  (suppl 22) 29-36
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Beck A, Dennis M. Speech-language pathologists' and teachers' perceptions of classroom-based interventions.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 1997;  28 146-153
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Cirrin F, Penner S. Classroom-based and consultative service delivery models for language intervention.  In: Fey M, Windsor J, Warren S, eds. Language Intervention: Preschool through the Elementary Years. Baltimore: Brookes 1995 : 333-362
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Eger D. Why now? Changing school speech-language service delivery. .  Baltimore: Brookes. 1992;  40-41
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Ehren B. Maintaining a therapeutic focus and sharing responsibility for student success: keys to in-classroom speech-language services.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 2000;  31 219-229
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Elksnin L, Capilouto G. Speech-language pathologists' perceptions of integrated service delivery in school settings.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 1994;  25 258-267
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Prelock P. An intervention focus for inclusionary practice.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 2000;  31 296-298
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Omnibus Survey Rockville, MD: Author 1995
  • 31 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2001 Omnibus Survey. Rockville, MD: Author 1996
  • 32 Peters-Johnson C. Action: school services.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 1996;  27 185-186
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Peters-Johnson C. Action: school services.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 1998;  29 120-126
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Karr S, Schooling T. The impact of high caseloads on speech-language pathology services for children in schools. Statement of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association to the Virginia Board of Education, Richmond, VA; July 26, 2001
  • 35 Whitmire K, Karr S, Mullen R. Action: school services.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 2000;  31 402-406
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. Reaction to “full inclusion”: a reaffirmation of the right of students with learning disabilities to a continuum of services.  ASHA . 1993;  63
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Thurlow M, Ysseldyke J, Wotruba J, Algozzine B. Instruction in special education classrooms under varying student-teacher ratios.  Elem Sch J . 1993;  93 305-321
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Algozzine B, Hendrickson J, Gable R, White R. Caseloads of teachers of students with behavioral disorders.  Behav Disord . 1993;  18 103-109
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Forness S, Kavale K. Effects of class size on attention, communication, and disruption of mildly mentally retarded children.  Am Educ Res J . 1985;  22 403-412
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Gottlieb J, Alter M. An evaluation study of the impact of modifying instructional group sizes in resource rooms and related service groups in New York City. New York: New York University; 1997 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 414 373)
  • 41 Fink W, Sandall S. A comparison of one-to-one and small group instructional strategies with developmentally disabled preschoolers.  Ment Retard . 1980;  18 34-36
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41a Torgeson J, Wagner R, Rashotte C, Alexander A, Conway T. Preventive and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities.  Learn Disabil . 1997;  8(1) 51-61
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Oliver P, Scott T. Group versus individual training in establishing generalization of language skills with severely handicapped individuals.  Ment Retard . 1981;  19 285-289
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Reid D, Favell J. Group instruction with persons who have severe disabilities: a critical review.  J Assoc Pers Severe Handicaps . 1984;  9(3) 167-177
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Snart F, Hillyard A. Staff ratios and allocated instructional time for multihandicapped students.  Except Child . 1985;  51(4) 289-296
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Kemps D, Walker D, Locke P, Delquadri J, Hall V. A comparison of instructional arrangements for children with autism served in a public school setting.  Educ Treat Child . 1990;  13(3) 197-216
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Lowenthal B. Effect of small-group instruction on language-delayed preschoolers.  Except Child . 1981;  48(2) 178-179
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 McCabe J, Jenkins J, Mills P, Dale P, Cole K, Pepler L. Effects of play group variables on language use by preschool children with disabilities.  J Early Intervent . 1996;  20 329-340
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Hart B, Risley T. In vivo language intervention: unanticipated general effects.  J Appl Behav Anal . 1980;  13 407-432
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Warren S, Rogers-Warren A. Language acquisition patterns in normal and handicapped children.  Top Early Child Spec Educ . 1982;  2(2) 70-77
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Wisniewski L, Gargiulo R. Occupational stress and burnout among special educators: a review of the literature.  J Spec Educ . 1997;  31 325-346
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Ohio Legislative Office of Education Oversight. Availability of Therapists to Work in Ohio Schools Columbus, OH: Author 1999
  • 52 Banks S, Necco E. The effects of special education category and type of training on job burnout in special education teachers.  Teach Educ Spec Educ . 1990;  13(3-4) 187-191
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Goldberg B. Recipe for tragedy: personnel shortages in the public schools.  ASHA . 1993;  36-40
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Miller M, Potter R. Professional burnout among speech-language pathologists.  ASHA . 1982;  177-180
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Pezzei C, Oratio A. A multivariate analysis of the job satisfaction of public school speech-language pathologists.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch . 1991;  22 139-146
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Hylton J. The Role of the Physical Therapist and the Occupational Therapist in the School Setting: Therapy in Educational Settings. Portland, OR: Oregon Health Sciences University; 1987 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 318 190)
  • 57 Johnson B, Meline T. A survey of supervisor workload practices: communication disorders programs in colleges.  Clin Superv . 1997;  16(1) 79-96
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Keith P. School psychologists use of time: interventions and effectiveness. Paper presented at 24th Annual Meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Philadelphia; March 1992 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 348 605)
  • 59 Mills C, Ivery C. A strategy for workload management in child protective practice.  Child Welfare . 1991;  70(1) 35-43
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Stein T, Callaghan J, McGee L, Douglas S. A caseload-weighting formula for child welfare services.  Child Welfare . 1990;  69(1) 33-42
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Olmstead J. Itinerant personnel: a survey of caseloads and working conditions.  J Visual Impairments Blindness . 1995;  89 546-548
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Ferner J. Successful Time Management: A Self-Teaching Guide.  New York: Wiley & Sons 1995
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 63 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Working for Change: A Guide for Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists in Schools. Rockville, MD: Author 2000
  • 64 Ehren B. Reducing caseloads (Special Interest Division 16). ASHA Leader 2001
  • 65 Power-deFur L. Reducing caseloads.  ASHA Leader . 2001;  4-10
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar

1 *Note: ASHA does not necessarily endorse these strategies.

[Appendix A] [Appendix B]