Download PDF
Seminars in Neurosurgery 2002; 13(3): 229-238
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-39939
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

A Review of Techniques Used for the Successful Performance of Carotid Endarterectomy

Patrick Cooper, James McInerney
  • Department of Neurosurgery, National Capital Consortium, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C., and National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 June 2003 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Stroke remains a major medical problem because of its high rate of morbidity and mortality.[1] Atherosclerotic disease of the carotid artery continues to be a contributing factor in many strokes. The effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for patients with carotid occlusive disease, with or without neurological symptoms, has been substantiated by several studies.[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] Although patients likely to experience the benefit of decreased stroke risk from CEA have been identified, there are a variety of specific technical details in performing the surgery that may help to decrease the stroke risk of the procedure itself. Meticulous attention to the fundamental techniques in the performance of a CEA is the primary means of reducing operative risk and is discussed here. In addition, the role of several divergent techniques proposed to further reduce operative risk, such as the type of anesthesia, the type of incision, the use of intraoperative shunting, the method of vessel closure, the use of the operating microscope, and the use of eversion versus conventional endarterectomy technique is reviewed.

KEYWORDS

Anatomy-carotid sheath - technique-carotid endarterectomy - outcomes-carotid endarterectomy

REFERENCES

  • 1 Gresham G E, Fitzpatrick T E. et al . Residual disability in survivors of stroke: the Framingham study.  N Engl J Med . 1975;  293 954-956
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.  JAMA . 1995;  273 1421-1428
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Mayberg M R, Wilson S E, Yatsu F. et al . Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group.  JAMA . 1991;  266 3289-3294
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) investigators. Clinical alert: benefit of carotid endarterectomy for patients with high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Trauma Division.  Stroke . 1991;  22 816-817
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.  N Engl J Med . 1991;  325 445-453
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis.  Lancet . 1991;  337 1235-1243
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress.  Stroke . 1991;  22 711-720
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Nussbaum E S, Heros R C. et al . Cost-effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy.  Neurosurgery . 1996;  38 237-244
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Barnett H J. Symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials.  Stroke . 1990;  21 (suppl 11) III2-5
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Mohr J P, Caplan L R, Melski J W. et al . The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: a prospective registry.  Neurology . 1978;  28 754-762
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Sacco R L, Wolf P A, Kannel W B. et al . Survival and recurrence following stroke. The Framingham study.  Stroke . 1982;  13 290-295
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Hobson II W R, Weiss D G, Fields W S. et al . Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group.  N Engl J Med . 1993;  328 221-227
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Moore W S, Barnett H J, Beebe H G. et al . Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc committee, American Heart Association.  Stroke . 1995;  26 188-201
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Biller J, Feinberg W M, Castaldo J E. et al . Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.  Circulation . 1998;  97 501-509
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Harbaugh K S, Harbaugh R E. Early discharge after carotid endarterectomy.  Neurosurgery . 1995;  37 219-225
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Loftus C M, Quest D O. Technical issues in carotid artery surgery 1995.  Neurosurgery . 1995;  36 629-647
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Loftus I M, McCarthy M J, Pau H. et al . Carotid endarterectomy without angiography does not compromise operative outcome.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 1998;  16 489-493
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Bailes J E. Carotid endarterectomy.  Neurosurgery . 2002;  50 1290-1295
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Findlay J M, Lougheed W M. Carotid microendarterectomy.  Neurosurgery . 1993;  32 792-798
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bartolucci R, D'Andrea V, Leo E, De Antoni E. [Cranial and neck nerve injuries following carotid endarterectomy intervention: review of the literature].  Chir Ital . 2001;  53 73-80
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kresowik T F, Bratzler D, Karp H R. et al . Multistate utilization, processes, and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy.  J Vasc Surg . 2001;  33 227-235
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Adams R J. Management issues for patients with ischemic stroke.  Neurology . 1995;  45(2 suppl 1) S15-S18
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Feinberg W M. Guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attacks. Ad Hoc Committee on Guidelines for the Management of Transient Ischemic Attacks of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.  Heart Dis Stroke . 1994;  3 275-283
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Beebe H G, Starr C, Slack D. Carotid artery stump pressure: its variability when measured serially.  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) . 1989;  30 419-423
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 McKay R D, Sundt T M, Michenfelder J D. et al . Internal carotid artery stump pressure and cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy: modification by halothane, enflurane, and innovar.  Anesthesiology . 1976;  45 390-399
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 McCarthy R J, McCabe A E, Walker R, Horrocks M. The value of transcranial Doppler in predicting cerebral ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 2001;  21 408-412
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Linstedt U, Maier C, Petry A. Intraoperative monitoring with somatosensory evoked potentials in carotid artery surgery: less reliable in patients with preoperative neurologic deficiency?.  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand . 1998;  42 13-16
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Prokop A, Meyer G P, Walter M, Erasmi H. Validity of SEP monitoring in carotid surgery: review and own results.  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) . 1996;  37 337-342
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Cao P, Giordano G, Zannetti S. et al . Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: is it appropriate for selecting patients in need of a shunt?.  J Vasc Surg . 1997;  26 973-980
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 McCarthy W J, Park A E, Koushanpour E, Pearce W H, Yao J S. Carotid endarterectomy: lessons from intraoperative monitoring-a decade of experience.  Ann Surg . 1996;  224 297-307
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Harbaugh K S, Harbaugh R E. Early discharge after carotid endarterectomy.  Neurosurgery . 1995;  37 219-225
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Melliere D, Desgranges P, Becquemin J P. et al . [Surgery of the internal carotid: local, regional or general anesthesia?].  Ann Chir . 2000;  125 530-538
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Usmanov N U, Gul'muradov T G, Sultanov D D, Lipatsev I I, Tursunkulova V G. [Advantages of endarterectomy of the carotid arteries under local anesthesia].  Grud Serdechnososudistaia Khir . 1991;  4 22-25
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Hafner C D, Evans W E. Carotid endarterectomy with local anesthesia: results and advantages.  J Vasc Surg . 1988;  7 232-239
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Connolly J E. Carotid endarterectomy in the awake patient.  Am J Surg . 1985;  150 159-165
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Slutzki S, Behar M, Negri M, Hod G, Zaidenstein L, Bogokowsky H. Carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia supplemented with neuroleptic analgesia.  Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1990;  170 141-144
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Mertens R, Canessa R, Valdes F. et al . [Carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia:initial experience].  Rev Med Chil . 2000;  128 53-58
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Rockman C B, Riles T S, Gold M. et al . A comparison of regional and general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.  J Vasc Surg . 1996;  24 946-956
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Becquemin J P, Paris E, Valverde A, Pluskwa F, Melliere D. Carotid surgery: is regional anesthesia always appropriate?.  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) . 1991;  32 592-598
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 de Borst J G, Moll F L, van de Pavoordt D H, Mauser H W, Kelder J C, Ackerstaf R G. Stroke from carotid endarterectomy: when and how to reduce perioperative stroke rate?.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 2001;  21 484-489
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Jernigan W R, Hamman J L. The causes and prevention of stroke associated with carotid artery surgery.  Am Surg . 1982;  48 79-84
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Lawrence P F, Alves J C, Jicha D, Bhirangi K, Dobrin P B. Incidence, timing, and causes of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy with regional anesthesia.  J Vasc Surg . 1998;  27 329-337
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Halsey Jr H J. Risks and benefits of shunting in carotid endarterectomy. The International Transcranial Doppler Collaborators.  Stroke . 1992;  23 1583-1587
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Prioleau Jr H W, Alken A F, Hairston P. Carotid endarterectomy: neurologic complications as related to surgical techniques.  Ann Surg . 1977;  185 678-683
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Ojemann R G, Heros R C. Carotid endarterectomy: to shunt or not to shunt?.  Arch Neurol . 1986;  43 617-618
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Sundt Jr M T. The ischemic tolerance of neural tissue and the need for monitoring and selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy.  Stroke . 1983;  14 93-98
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Tsao N W, Hsu C P, Kan C B. et al . [Perioperative result of carotid endarterectomies with venous patch angioplasty].  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) . 2002;  65 69-73
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 McCready R A, Siderys H, Pittman J N. et al . Delayed postoperative bleeding from polytetrafluoroethylene carotid artery patches.  J Vasc Surg . 1992;  15 661-663
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Allen P J, Jackson M R, O'Donnell S D, Gillespie D L. Saphenous vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene carotid patch angioplasty.  Am J Surg . 1997;  174 115-117
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Katz D, Snyder S O, Gandi R H. et al . Long-term follow-up for recurrent stenosis: a prospective randomized study of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch angioplasty versus primary closure after carotid endarterectomy.  J Vasc Surg . 1994;  19 198-205
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Clagett G P, Patterson C B, Fisher Jr F D. et al . Vein patch versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy: a randomized prospective study in a selected group of patients.  J Vasc Surg . 1989;  9 213-223
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Archie Jr P J. Geometric dimension changes with carotid endarterectomy reconstruction.  J Vasc Surg . 1997;  25 488-498
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Counsell C E, Salinas R, Naylor R, Warlow C P. A systematic review of the randomised trials of carotid patch angioplasty in carotid endarterectomy.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 1997;  13 345-354
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Archie J P. Patching with carotid endarterectomy:when to do it and what to use.  Seminars in Vascular Surgery . 1998;  11 24-29
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Crawford E S, DeBakey M E. et al . Surgical treatment of occlusive cerebrovascular disease.  Surg Clin North Am . 1966;  46 873-884
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Cao P, De Rango P, Zannetti S. Eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 2002;  23 195-201
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Ballotta E, Da Gau G, Baracchini C, Manara R. Carotid eversion endarterectomy: perioperative outcome and restenosis incidence.  Ann Vasc Surg . 2002;  23 23
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Cao P G, de Rango P, Zannetti S, Giordano G, Ricci S, Celani M G. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke.  Cochrane Review . 2001;  4 1-22
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Moore W S, Young B, Baker W H. et al . Surgical results: a justification of the surgeon selection process for the ACAS trial. The ACAS Investigators.  J Vasc Surg . 1996;  23 323-328
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Skillman J J, Kent K C, Anninos E. et al . Do neck incisions influence nerve deficits after carotid endarterectomy?.  Arch Surg . 1994;  129 48-752
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Chandler W F, Ercius M S, Ford J W, LaBond V, Burkel W E. The effect of heparin reversal after carotid endarterectomy in the dog: a scanning electron microscopy study.  J Neurosurg . 1982;  56 97-102
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Mauney M C, Buchanan S A, Lawrence W A. et al . Stroke rate is markedly reduced after carotid endarterectomy by avoidance of protamine.  J Vasc Surg . 1995;  22 264-270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Ascher E, Markevich N, Hingorani A P, Kallakuri S, Gunduz Y. Internal carotid artery flow volume measurement and other intraoperative duplex scanning parameters as predictors of stroke after carotid endarterectomy.  J Vasc Surg . 2002;  35 439-444
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Russo G, Di Maro D, Grasso U, Daniele B. Carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective analysis: microendarterectomy and transcranial Doppler ultrasound monitoring.  J Neurosurg Sci . 2001;  45 206-212
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Papanicolaou G, Toms C, Yellin A E, Weaver F A. Relationship between intraoperative color-flow duplex findings and early restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: a preliminary report.  J Vasc Surg . 1996;  24 588-596
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar